From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> To: soc@kernel.org Cc: arm@kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com> Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 2/3] Drop pm_runtime_irq_safe() for smartreflex for v5.15 Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 10:54:56 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <YRTT0Oejj22qNAL+@atomide.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <pull-1628751694-126144@atomide.com-2> Hi, * Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [210812 07:04]: > From: "Tony Lindgren" <tony@atomide.com> > > The following changes since commit fdc07ca0724dd8ad00c22909a1464dc73ed6783e: > > Merge branch 'omap-for-v5.14/ti-sysc' into omap-for-v5.15/ti-sysc (2021-07-27 12:02:24 +0300) > > are available in the Git repository at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap tags/omap-for-v5.15/sr-signed > > for you to fetch changes up to 74953a9136cfd650dd994daded520528f737b7b3: > > soc: ti: Remove pm_runtime_irq_safe() usage for smartreflex (2021-08-06 09:53:59 +0300) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Drop pm_runtime_irq_safe() usage for smartreflex for v5.15 > > We now have cleard pm_runtime_irq_safe() usage for all TI SoCs > in Linux next except for smartreflex and 8250_omap. This change > removes pm_runtime_irq_safe() usage for smartreflex, the > 8250_omap depends on pending serial layer PM changes. Looks like Santosh already queued up this patch and sent a pull request, so my pull request for this change can be just ignored. Regrds, Tony > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Tony Lindgren (1): > soc: ti: Remove pm_runtime_irq_safe() usage for smartreflex > > drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c | 6 ++--- > drivers/soc/ti/smartreflex.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++---------------------- > include/linux/power/smartreflex.h | 2 ++ > 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> To: soc@kernel.org Cc: arm@kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com> Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 2/3] Drop pm_runtime_irq_safe() for smartreflex for v5.15 Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 10:54:56 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <YRTT0Oejj22qNAL+@atomide.com> (raw) Message-ID: <20210812075456.ua7Lfr60FIpw3RrHkBMzPlJLytCaNtEBTubyEhk_9EE@z> (raw) In-Reply-To: <pull-1628751694-126144@atomide.com-2> Hi, * Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [210812 07:04]: > From: "Tony Lindgren" <tony@atomide.com> > > The following changes since commit fdc07ca0724dd8ad00c22909a1464dc73ed6783e: > > Merge branch 'omap-for-v5.14/ti-sysc' into omap-for-v5.15/ti-sysc (2021-07-27 12:02:24 +0300) > > are available in the Git repository at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap tags/omap-for-v5.15/sr-signed > > for you to fetch changes up to 74953a9136cfd650dd994daded520528f737b7b3: > > soc: ti: Remove pm_runtime_irq_safe() usage for smartreflex (2021-08-06 09:53:59 +0300) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Drop pm_runtime_irq_safe() usage for smartreflex for v5.15 > > We now have cleard pm_runtime_irq_safe() usage for all TI SoCs > in Linux next except for smartreflex and 8250_omap. This change > removes pm_runtime_irq_safe() usage for smartreflex, the > 8250_omap depends on pending serial layer PM changes. Looks like Santosh already queued up this patch and sent a pull request, so my pull request for this change can be just ignored. Regrds, Tony > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Tony Lindgren (1): > soc: ti: Remove pm_runtime_irq_safe() usage for smartreflex > > drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c | 6 ++--- > drivers/soc/ti/smartreflex.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++---------------------- > include/linux/power/smartreflex.h | 2 ++ > 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-12 7:54 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-08-12 7:03 [GIT PULL 1/3] Two missed omap Kconfig patches for v5.15 Tony Lindgren 2021-08-12 7:03 ` Tony Lindgren 2021-08-12 7:03 ` [GIT PULL 2/3] Drop pm_runtime_irq_safe() for smartreflex " Tony Lindgren 2021-08-12 7:03 ` Tony Lindgren 2021-08-12 7:54 ` Tony Lindgren [this message] 2021-08-12 7:54 ` Tony Lindgren 2021-08-12 20:44 ` Arnd Bergmann 2021-08-12 20:44 ` Arnd Bergmann 2021-08-12 7:03 ` [GIT PULL 3/3] Changes for am3 cpsw and SanCloud " Tony Lindgren 2021-08-12 7:03 ` Tony Lindgren 2021-08-12 21:05 ` Arnd Bergmann 2021-08-12 21:05 ` Arnd Bergmann 2021-08-12 20:41 ` [GIT PULL 1/3] Two missed omap Kconfig patches " Arnd Bergmann 2021-08-12 20:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=YRTT0Oejj22qNAL+@atomide.com \ --to=tony@atomide.com \ --cc=arm@kernel.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com \ --cc=soc@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).