stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] signal/arm64: Use force_sig not force_sig_fault for SIGKILL" failed to apply to 5.2-stable tree
@ 2019-07-23 10:54 gregkh
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: gregkh @ 2019-07-23 10:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ebiederm, Dave.Martin, james.morse, will.deacon; +Cc: stable


The patch below does not apply to the 5.2-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 82e10af2248d2d09c99834613f1b47d5002dc379 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 10:55:21 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] signal/arm64: Use force_sig not force_sig_fault for SIGKILL

I don't think this is userspace visible but SIGKILL does not have
any si_codes that use the fault member of the siginfo union.  Correct
this the simple way and call force_sig instead of force_sig_fault when
the signal is SIGKILL.

The two know places where synchronous SIGKILL are generated are
do_bad_area and fpsimd_save.  The call paths to force_sig_fault are:
do_bad_area
  arm64_force_sig_fault
    force_sig_fault
force_signal_inject
  arm64_notify_die
    arm64_force_sig_fault
       force_sig_fault

Which means correcting this in arm64_force_sig_fault is enough
to ensure the arm64 code is not misusing the generic code, which
could lead to maintenance problems later.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Fixes: af40ff687bc9 ("arm64: signal: Ensure si_code is valid for all fault signals")
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
index ade32046f3fe..e45d5b440fb1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
@@ -256,7 +256,10 @@ void arm64_force_sig_fault(int signo, int code, void __user *addr,
 			   const char *str)
 {
 	arm64_show_signal(signo, str);
-	force_sig_fault(signo, code, addr, current);
+	if (signo == SIGKILL)
+		force_sig(SIGKILL, current);
+	else
+		force_sig_fault(signo, code, addr, current);
 }
 
 void arm64_force_sig_mceerr(int code, void __user *addr, short lsb,


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2019-07-23 10:55 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-07-23 10:54 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] signal/arm64: Use force_sig not force_sig_fault for SIGKILL" failed to apply to 5.2-stable tree gregkh

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).