FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: tracepoints: Fix wrong parameter order for qgroup" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree

* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: tracepoints: Fix wrong parameter order for qgroup" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree
@ 2019-10-27 15:48 gregkh
  2019-10-28 15:21 ` Sasha Levin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: gregkh @ 2019-10-27 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: wqu, dsterba, nborisov; +Cc: stable


The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From fd2b007eaec898564e269d1f478a2da0380ecf51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 10:38:36 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: tracepoints: Fix wrong parameter order for qgroup
 events

[BUG]
For btrfs:qgroup_meta_reserve event, the trace event can output garbage:

  qgroup_meta_reserve: 9c7f6acc-b342-4037-bc47-7f6e4d2232d7: refroot=5(FS_TREE) type=DATA diff=2

The diff should always be alinged to sector size (4k), so there is
definitely something wrong.

[CAUSE]
For the wrong @diff, it's caused by wrong parameter order.
The correct parameters are:

  struct btrfs_root, s64 diff, int type.

However the parameters used are:

  struct btrfs_root, int type, s64 diff.

Fixes: 4ee0d8832c2e ("btrfs: qgroup: Update trace events for metadata reservation")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
index c4bb69941c77..3ad151655eb8 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
@@ -3629,7 +3629,7 @@ int __btrfs_qgroup_reserve_meta(struct btrfs_root *root, int num_bytes,
 		return 0;
 
 	BUG_ON(num_bytes != round_down(num_bytes, fs_info->nodesize));
-	trace_qgroup_meta_reserve(root, type, (s64)num_bytes);
+	trace_qgroup_meta_reserve(root, (s64)num_bytes, type);
 	ret = qgroup_reserve(root, num_bytes, enforce, type);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
@@ -3676,7 +3676,7 @@ void __btrfs_qgroup_free_meta(struct btrfs_root *root, int num_bytes,
 	 */
 	num_bytes = sub_root_meta_rsv(root, num_bytes, type);
 	BUG_ON(num_bytes != round_down(num_bytes, fs_info->nodesize));
-	trace_qgroup_meta_reserve(root, type, -(s64)num_bytes);
+	trace_qgroup_meta_reserve(root, -(s64)num_bytes, type);
 	btrfs_qgroup_free_refroot(fs_info, root->root_key.objectid,
 				  num_bytes, type);
 }


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread