* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] dmabuf: use spinlock to access dmabuf->name" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree
@ 2020-07-20 12:17 gregkh
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: gregkh @ 2020-07-20 12:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: charante, christian.koenig, michael.j.ruhl, stable, sumit.semwal; +Cc: stable
The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 6348dd291e3653534a9e28e6917569bc9967b35b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Charan Teja Kalla <charante@codeaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 17:27:19 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] dmabuf: use spinlock to access dmabuf->name
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
There exists a sleep-while-atomic bug while accessing the dmabuf->name
under mutex in the dmabuffs_dname(). This is caused from the SELinux
permissions checks on a process where it tries to validate the inherited
files from fork() by traversing them through iterate_fd() (which
traverse files under spin_lock) and call
match_file(security/selinux/hooks.c) where the permission checks happen.
This audit information is logged using dump_common_audit_data() where it
calls d_path() to get the file path name. If the file check happen on
the dmabuf's fd, then it ends up in ->dmabuffs_dname() and use mutex to
access dmabuf->name. The flow will be like below:
flush_unauthorized_files()
iterate_fd()
spin_lock() --> Start of the atomic section.
match_file()
file_has_perm()
avc_has_perm()
avc_audit()
slow_avc_audit()
common_lsm_audit()
dump_common_audit_data()
audit_log_d_path()
d_path()
dmabuffs_dname()
mutex_lock()--> Sleep while atomic.
Call trace captured (on 4.19 kernels) is below:
___might_sleep+0x204/0x208
__might_sleep+0x50/0x88
__mutex_lock_common+0x5c/0x1068
__mutex_lock_common+0x5c/0x1068
mutex_lock_nested+0x40/0x50
dmabuffs_dname+0xa0/0x170
d_path+0x84/0x290
audit_log_d_path+0x74/0x130
common_lsm_audit+0x334/0x6e8
slow_avc_audit+0xb8/0xf8
avc_has_perm+0x154/0x218
file_has_perm+0x70/0x180
match_file+0x60/0x78
iterate_fd+0x128/0x168
selinux_bprm_committing_creds+0x178/0x248
security_bprm_committing_creds+0x30/0x48
install_exec_creds+0x1c/0x68
load_elf_binary+0x3a4/0x14e0
search_binary_handler+0xb0/0x1e0
So, use spinlock to access dmabuf->name to avoid sleep-while-atomic.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [5.3+]
Signed-off-by: Charan Teja Kalla <charante@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
[sumits: added comment to spinlock_t definition to avoid warning]
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/a83e7f0d-4e54-9848-4b58-e1acdbe06735@codeaurora.org
diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
index 412629601ad3..1ca609f66fdf 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
@@ -45,10 +45,10 @@ static char *dmabuffs_dname(struct dentry *dentry, char *buffer, int buflen)
size_t ret = 0;
dmabuf = dentry->d_fsdata;
- dma_resv_lock(dmabuf->resv, NULL);
+ spin_lock(&dmabuf->name_lock);
if (dmabuf->name)
ret = strlcpy(name, dmabuf->name, DMA_BUF_NAME_LEN);
- dma_resv_unlock(dmabuf->resv);
+ spin_unlock(&dmabuf->name_lock);
return dynamic_dname(dentry, buffer, buflen, "/%s:%s",
dentry->d_name.name, ret > 0 ? name : "");
@@ -338,8 +338,10 @@ static long dma_buf_set_name(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, const char __user *buf)
kfree(name);
goto out_unlock;
}
+ spin_lock(&dmabuf->name_lock);
kfree(dmabuf->name);
dmabuf->name = name;
+ spin_unlock(&dmabuf->name_lock);
out_unlock:
dma_resv_unlock(dmabuf->resv);
@@ -402,10 +404,10 @@ static void dma_buf_show_fdinfo(struct seq_file *m, struct file *file)
/* Don't count the temporary reference taken inside procfs seq_show */
seq_printf(m, "count:\t%ld\n", file_count(dmabuf->file) - 1);
seq_printf(m, "exp_name:\t%s\n", dmabuf->exp_name);
- dma_resv_lock(dmabuf->resv, NULL);
+ spin_lock(&dmabuf->name_lock);
if (dmabuf->name)
seq_printf(m, "name:\t%s\n", dmabuf->name);
- dma_resv_unlock(dmabuf->resv);
+ spin_unlock(&dmabuf->name_lock);
}
static const struct file_operations dma_buf_fops = {
@@ -542,6 +544,7 @@ struct dma_buf *dma_buf_export(const struct dma_buf_export_info *exp_info)
dmabuf->size = exp_info->size;
dmabuf->exp_name = exp_info->exp_name;
dmabuf->owner = exp_info->owner;
+ spin_lock_init(&dmabuf->name_lock);
init_waitqueue_head(&dmabuf->poll);
dmabuf->cb_excl.poll = dmabuf->cb_shared.poll = &dmabuf->poll;
dmabuf->cb_excl.active = dmabuf->cb_shared.active = 0;
diff --git a/include/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
index ab0c156abee6..a2ca294eaebe 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma-buf.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
@@ -311,6 +311,7 @@ struct dma_buf {
void *vmap_ptr;
const char *exp_name;
const char *name;
+ spinlock_t name_lock; /* spinlock to protect name access */
struct module *owner;
struct list_head list_node;
void *priv;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2020-07-20 12:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-07-20 12:17 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] dmabuf: use spinlock to access dmabuf->name" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree gregkh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).