stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] x86/insn-eval: Use new for_each_insn_prefix() macro to loop" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree
@ 2020-12-09  8:48 gregkh
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: gregkh @ 2020-12-09  8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mhiramat, bp, keescook; +Cc: stable


The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 12cb908a11b2544b5f53e9af856e6b6a90ed5533 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 13:50:50 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] x86/insn-eval: Use new for_each_insn_prefix() macro to loop
 over prefixes bytes

Since insn.prefixes.nbytes can be bigger than the size of
insn.prefixes.bytes[] when a prefix is repeated, the proper check must
be

  insn.prefixes.bytes[i] != 0 and i < 4

instead of using insn.prefixes.nbytes. Use the new
for_each_insn_prefix() macro which does it correctly.

Debugged by Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>.

 [ bp: Massage commit message. ]

Fixes: 32d0b95300db ("x86/insn-eval: Add utility functions to get segment selector")
Reported-by: syzbot+9b64b619f10f19d19a7c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160697104969.3146288.16329307586428270032.stgit@devnote2

diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
index 58f7fb95c7f4..4229950a5d78 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
@@ -63,13 +63,12 @@ static bool is_string_insn(struct insn *insn)
  */
 bool insn_has_rep_prefix(struct insn *insn)
 {
+	insn_byte_t p;
 	int i;
 
 	insn_get_prefixes(insn);
 
-	for (i = 0; i < insn->prefixes.nbytes; i++) {
-		insn_byte_t p = insn->prefixes.bytes[i];
-
+	for_each_insn_prefix(insn, i, p) {
 		if (p == 0xf2 || p == 0xf3)
 			return true;
 	}
@@ -95,14 +94,15 @@ static int get_seg_reg_override_idx(struct insn *insn)
 {
 	int idx = INAT_SEG_REG_DEFAULT;
 	int num_overrides = 0, i;
+	insn_byte_t p;
 
 	insn_get_prefixes(insn);
 
 	/* Look for any segment override prefixes. */
-	for (i = 0; i < insn->prefixes.nbytes; i++) {
+	for_each_insn_prefix(insn, i, p) {
 		insn_attr_t attr;
 
-		attr = inat_get_opcode_attribute(insn->prefixes.bytes[i]);
+		attr = inat_get_opcode_attribute(p);
 		switch (attr) {
 		case INAT_MAKE_PREFIX(INAT_PFX_CS):
 			idx = INAT_SEG_REG_CS;


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2020-12-09 15:53 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-12-09  8:48 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] x86/insn-eval: Use new for_each_insn_prefix() macro to loop" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree gregkh

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).