* WTF: patch "[PATCH] selftests/landlock: Add tests for O_PATH" was seriously submitted to be applied to the 5.18-stable tree?
@ 2022-06-06 7:51 gregkh
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: gregkh @ 2022-06-06 7:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mic, shuah; +Cc: stable
The patch below was submitted to be applied to the 5.18-stable tree.
I fail to see how this patch meets the stable kernel rules as found at
Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst.
I could be totally wrong, and if so, please respond to
<stable@vger.kernel.org> and let me know why this patch should be
applied. Otherwise, it is now dropped from my patch queues, never to be
seen again.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From d1788ad990874734341b05ab8ccb6448c09c6422 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Micka=C3=ABl=20Sala=C3=BCn?= <mic@digikod.net>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 18:08:17 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] selftests/landlock: Add tests for O_PATH
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
The O_PATH flag is currently not handled by Landlock. Let's make sure
this behavior will remain consistent with the same ruleset over time.
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220506160820.524344-8-mic@digikod.net
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c
index 9165f6adf7b9..a8f54c4462eb 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c
@@ -654,17 +654,23 @@ TEST_F_FORK(layout1, effective_access)
enforce_ruleset(_metadata, ruleset_fd);
ASSERT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd));
- /* Tests on a directory. */
+ /* Tests on a directory (with or without O_PATH). */
ASSERT_EQ(EACCES, test_open("/", O_RDONLY));
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, test_open("/", O_RDONLY | O_PATH));
ASSERT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(dir_s1d1, O_RDONLY));
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, test_open(dir_s1d1, O_RDONLY | O_PATH));
ASSERT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(file1_s1d1, O_RDONLY));
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, test_open(file1_s1d1, O_RDONLY | O_PATH));
+
ASSERT_EQ(0, test_open(dir_s1d2, O_RDONLY));
ASSERT_EQ(0, test_open(file1_s1d2, O_RDONLY));
ASSERT_EQ(0, test_open(dir_s1d3, O_RDONLY));
ASSERT_EQ(0, test_open(file1_s1d3, O_RDONLY));
- /* Tests on a file. */
+ /* Tests on a file (with or without O_PATH). */
ASSERT_EQ(EACCES, test_open(dir_s2d2, O_RDONLY));
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, test_open(dir_s2d2, O_RDONLY | O_PATH));
+
ASSERT_EQ(0, test_open(file1_s2d2, O_RDONLY));
/* Checks effective read and write actions. */
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2022-06-06 7:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-06-06 7:51 WTF: patch "[PATCH] selftests/landlock: Add tests for O_PATH" was seriously submitted to be applied to the 5.18-stable tree? gregkh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).