From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org,
patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com,
slade@sladewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/18] 5.4.184-rc1 review
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 09:38:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ef6fd89-6648-215d-d44e-d577e242276f@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220309155856.552503355@linuxfoundation.org>
On 3/9/22 7:59 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.184 release.
> There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Mar 2022 15:58:48 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.184-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Russell made me aware of this message of yours:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/YiiuCMd%2FhLmQ7tfS@kroah.com/
do you expect to get ARM64 patches for 5.4 (included) and versions
before and publish those as a different stable tag with those
specifically? If so, would not it be easier from a logistics point of
view if ARM, ARM64 and x86 all get BHB mitigations within the same
stable tag?
Thanks
--
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-09 17:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-09 15:59 [PATCH 5.4 00/18] 5.4.184-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-03-09 15:59 ` [PATCH 5.4 01/18] x86/speculation: Merge one test in spectre_v2_user_select_mitigation() Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-03-09 15:59 ` [PATCH 5.4 02/18] x86,bugs: Unconditionally allow spectre_v2=retpoline,amd Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-03-09 15:59 ` [PATCH 5.4 03/18] x86/speculation: Rename RETPOLINE_AMD to RETPOLINE_LFENCE Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-03-09 15:59 ` [PATCH 5.4 04/18] x86/speculation: Add eIBRS + Retpoline options Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-03-09 15:59 ` [PATCH 5.4 05/18] Documentation/hw-vuln: Update spectre doc Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-03-09 15:59 ` [PATCH 5.4 06/18] x86/speculation: Include unprivileged eBPF status in Spectre v2 mitigation reporting Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-03-09 15:59 ` [PATCH 5.4 07/18] x86/speculation: Use generic retpoline by default on AMD Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-03-09 15:59 ` [PATCH 5.4 08/18] x86/speculation: Update link to AMD speculation whitepaper Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-03-09 15:59 ` [PATCH 5.4 09/18] x86/speculation: Warn about Spectre v2 LFENCE mitigation Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-03-09 15:59 ` [PATCH 5.4 10/18] x86/speculation: Warn about eIBRS + LFENCE + Unprivileged eBPF + SMT Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-03-09 16:00 ` [PATCH 5.4 11/18] arm/arm64: Provide a wrapper for SMCCC 1.1 calls Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-03-09 16:00 ` [PATCH 5.4 12/18] arm/arm64: smccc/psci: add arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit() Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-03-09 16:00 ` [PATCH 5.4 13/18] ARM: report Spectre v2 status through sysfs Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-03-09 16:00 ` [PATCH 5.4 14/18] ARM: early traps initialisation Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-03-09 16:00 ` [PATCH 5.4 15/18] ARM: use LOADADDR() to get load address of sections Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-03-09 16:00 ` [PATCH 5.4 16/18] ARM: Spectre-BHB workaround Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-03-09 16:00 ` [PATCH 5.4 17/18] ARM: include unprivileged BPF status in Spectre V2 reporting Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-03-09 16:00 ` [PATCH 5.4 18/18] ARM: fix build error when BPF_SYSCALL is disabled Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-03-09 17:38 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2022-03-09 17:50 ` [PATCH 5.4 00/18] 5.4.184-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-03-09 19:27 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-03-09 20:25 ` Shuah Khan
2022-03-09 20:50 ` Daniel Díaz
2022-03-10 3:20 ` Samuel Zou
2022-03-10 4:01 ` Florian Fainelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1ef6fd89-6648-215d-d44e-d577e242276f@gmail.com \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=patches@kernelci.org \
--cc=pavel@denx.de \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=slade@sladewatkins.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).