stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/2] bcache: fix stack corruption by PRECEDING_KEY()
       [not found] <20190609221335.24616-1-colyli@suse.de>
@ 2019-06-09 22:13 ` Coly Li
  2019-06-09 22:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] bcache: only set BCACHE_DEV_WB_RUNNING when cached device attached Coly Li
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Coly Li @ 2019-06-09 22:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: axboe
  Cc: linux-bcache, linux-block, rolf, pierre.juhen, Coly Li,
	Kent Overstreet, Nix, stable

Recently people report bcache code compiled with gcc9 is broken, one of
the buggy behavior I observe is that two adjacent 4KB I/Os should merge
into one but they don't. Finally it turns out to be a stack corruption
caused by macro PRECEDING_KEY().

See how PRECEDING_KEY() is defined in bset.h,
437 #define PRECEDING_KEY(_k)                                       \
438 ({                                                              \
439         struct bkey *_ret = NULL;                               \
440                                                                 \
441         if (KEY_INODE(_k) || KEY_OFFSET(_k)) {                  \
442                 _ret = &KEY(KEY_INODE(_k), KEY_OFFSET(_k), 0);  \
443                                                                 \
444                 if (!_ret->low)                                 \
445                         _ret->high--;                           \
446                 _ret->low--;                                    \
447         }                                                       \
448                                                                 \
449         _ret;                                                   \
450 })

At line 442, _ret points to address of a on-stack variable combined by
KEY(), the life range of this on-stack variable is in line 442-446,
once _ret is returned to bch_btree_insert_key(), the returned address
points to an invalid stack address and this address is overwritten in
the following called bch_btree_iter_init(). Then argument 'search' of
bch_btree_iter_init() points to some address inside stackframe of
bch_btree_iter_init(), exact address depends on how the compiler
allocates stack space. Now the stack is corrupted.

Fixes: 0eacac22034c ("bcache: PRECEDING_KEY()")
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Rolf Fokkens <rolf@rolffokkens.nl>
Reviewed-by: Pierre JUHEN <pierre.juhen@orange.fr>
Tested-by: Shenghui Wang <shhuiw@foxmail.com>
Tested-by: Pierre JUHEN <pierre.juhen@orange.fr>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Cc: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
Changlog:
V2: Fix a pointer assignment problem in preceding_key(), which is
    pointed by Rolf Fokkens and Pierre JUHEN.
V1: Initial RFC patch for review and comment.

 drivers/md/bcache/bset.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
 drivers/md/bcache/bset.h | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/bset.c b/drivers/md/bcache/bset.c
index 8f07fa6e1739..268f1b685084 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/bset.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/bset.c
@@ -887,12 +887,22 @@ unsigned int bch_btree_insert_key(struct btree_keys *b, struct bkey *k,
 	struct bset *i = bset_tree_last(b)->data;
 	struct bkey *m, *prev = NULL;
 	struct btree_iter iter;
+	struct bkey preceding_key_on_stack = ZERO_KEY;
+	struct bkey *preceding_key_p = &preceding_key_on_stack;
 
 	BUG_ON(b->ops->is_extents && !KEY_SIZE(k));
 
-	m = bch_btree_iter_init(b, &iter, b->ops->is_extents
-				? PRECEDING_KEY(&START_KEY(k))
-				: PRECEDING_KEY(k));
+	/*
+	 * If k has preceding key, preceding_key_p will be set to address
+	 *  of k's preceding key; otherwise preceding_key_p will be set
+	 * to NULL inside preceding_key().
+	 */
+	if (b->ops->is_extents)
+		preceding_key(&START_KEY(k), &preceding_key_p);
+	else
+		preceding_key(k, &preceding_key_p);
+
+	m = bch_btree_iter_init(b, &iter, preceding_key_p);
 
 	if (b->ops->insert_fixup(b, k, &iter, replace_key))
 		return status;
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/bset.h b/drivers/md/bcache/bset.h
index bac76aabca6d..c71365e7c1fa 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/bset.h
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/bset.h
@@ -434,20 +434,26 @@ static inline bool bch_cut_back(const struct bkey *where, struct bkey *k)
 	return __bch_cut_back(where, k);
 }
 
-#define PRECEDING_KEY(_k)					\
-({								\
-	struct bkey *_ret = NULL;				\
-								\
-	if (KEY_INODE(_k) || KEY_OFFSET(_k)) {			\
-		_ret = &KEY(KEY_INODE(_k), KEY_OFFSET(_k), 0);	\
-								\
-		if (!_ret->low)					\
-			_ret->high--;				\
-		_ret->low--;					\
-	}							\
-								\
-	_ret;							\
-})
+/*
+ * Pointer '*preceding_key_p' points to a memory object to store preceding
+ * key of k. If the preceding key does not exist, set '*preceding_key_p' to
+ * NULL. So the caller of preceding_key() needs to take care of memory
+ * which '*preceding_key_p' pointed to before calling preceding_key().
+ * Currently the only caller of preceding_key() is bch_btree_insert_key(),
+ * and it points to an on-stack variable, so the memory release is handled
+ * by stackframe itself.
+ */
+static inline void preceding_key(struct bkey *k, struct bkey **preceding_key_p)
+{
+	if (KEY_INODE(k) || KEY_OFFSET(k)) {
+		(**preceding_key_p) = KEY(KEY_INODE(k), KEY_OFFSET(k), 0);
+		if (!(*preceding_key_p)->low)
+			(*preceding_key_p)->high--;
+		(*preceding_key_p)->low--;
+	} else {
+		(*preceding_key_p) = NULL;
+	}
+}
 
 static inline bool bch_ptr_invalid(struct btree_keys *b, const struct bkey *k)
 {
-- 
2.16.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/2] bcache: only set BCACHE_DEV_WB_RUNNING when cached device attached
       [not found] <20190609221335.24616-1-colyli@suse.de>
  2019-06-09 22:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] bcache: fix stack corruption by PRECEDING_KEY() Coly Li
@ 2019-06-09 22:13 ` Coly Li
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Coly Li @ 2019-06-09 22:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: axboe; +Cc: linux-bcache, linux-block, rolf, pierre.juhen, Coly Li, stable

When people set a writeback percent via sysfs file,
  /sys/block/bcache<N>/bcache/writeback_percent
current code directly sets BCACHE_DEV_WB_RUNNING to dc->disk.flags
and schedules kworker dc->writeback_rate_update.

If there is no cache set attached to, the writeback kernel thread is
not running indeed, running dc->writeback_rate_update does not make
sense and may cause NULL pointer deference when reference cache set
pointer inside update_writeback_rate().

This patch checks whether the cache set point (dc->disk.c) is NULL in
sysfs interface handler, and only set BCACHE_DEV_WB_RUNNING and
schedule dc->writeback_rate_update when dc->disk.c is not NULL (it
means the cache device is attached to a cache set).

This problem might be introduced from initial bcache commit, but
commit 3fd47bfe55b0 ("bcache: stop dc->writeback_rate_update properly")
changes part of the original code piece, so I add 'Fixes: 3fd47bfe55b0'
to indicate from which commit this patch can be applied.

Fixes: 3fd47bfe55b0 ("bcache: stop dc->writeback_rate_update properly")
Reported-by: Bjørn Forsman <bjorn.forsman@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Bjørn Forsman <bjorn.forsman@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c b/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c
index 6cd44d3cf906..bfb437ffb13c 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c
@@ -431,8 +431,13 @@ STORE(bch_cached_dev)
 			bch_writeback_queue(dc);
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Only set BCACHE_DEV_WB_RUNNING when cached device attached to
+	 * a cache set, otherwise it doesn't make sense.
+	 */
 	if (attr == &sysfs_writeback_percent)
-		if (!test_and_set_bit(BCACHE_DEV_WB_RUNNING, &dc->disk.flags))
+		if ((dc->disk.c != NULL) &&
+		    (!test_and_set_bit(BCACHE_DEV_WB_RUNNING, &dc->disk.flags)))
 			schedule_delayed_work(&dc->writeback_rate_update,
 				      dc->writeback_rate_update_seconds * HZ);
 
-- 
2.16.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-06-09 22:15 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20190609221335.24616-1-colyli@suse.de>
2019-06-09 22:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] bcache: fix stack corruption by PRECEDING_KEY() Coly Li
2019-06-09 22:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] bcache: only set BCACHE_DEV_WB_RUNNING when cached device attached Coly Li

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).