* Re: Patch "ALSA: pcm: Return 0 when size < start_threshold in capture" has been added to the 4.19-stable tree
[not found] <20190911093035.57F102089F@mail.kernel.org>
@ 2019-09-11 14:14 ` Ricardo Biehl Pasquali
2019-09-11 14:20 ` Ricardo Biehl Pasquali
2019-09-11 16:49 ` Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Biehl Pasquali @ 2019-09-11 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sasha Levin; +Cc: stable
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 05:30:33AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
>
> ALSA: pcm: Return 0 when size < start_threshold in capture
>
> to the 4.19-stable tree which can be found at:
> http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
>
> The filename of the patch is:
> alsa-pcm-return-0-when-size-start_threshold-in-captu.patch
> and it can be found in the queue-4.19 subdirectory.
>
> If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
> please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
Hi Sasha.
This patch was reverted by the commit 932a81519572156a88db
("ALSA: pcm: Comment why read blocks when PCM is not
running"):
This avoids bringing back the problem introduced by
62ba568f7aef ("ALSA: pcm: Return 0 when size <
start_threshold in capture") and fixed in 00a399cad1a0
("ALSA: pcm: Revert capture stream behavior change in
blocking mode"), which prevented the user from starting
capture from another thread.
Should this be queued anyway? If yes, I think it should also
be queued the fix and the commit above.
pasquali
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Patch "ALSA: pcm: Return 0 when size < start_threshold in capture" has been added to the 4.19-stable tree
2019-09-11 14:14 ` Patch "ALSA: pcm: Return 0 when size < start_threshold in capture" has been added to the 4.19-stable tree Ricardo Biehl Pasquali
@ 2019-09-11 14:20 ` Ricardo Biehl Pasquali
2019-09-11 16:49 ` Sasha Levin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Biehl Pasquali @ 2019-09-11 14:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sasha Levin; +Cc: stable
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 11:14:31AM -0300, Ricardo Biehl Pasquali wrote:
> This patch was reverted by the commit 932a81519572156a88db
> ("ALSA: pcm: Comment why read blocks when PCM is not
> running"):
Sorry. It was reverted by 00a399cad1a0 ("ALSA: pcm: Revert
capture stream behavior change in blocking mode"). The
commit I mentioned just add a comment as described below:
>
> This avoids bringing back the problem introduced by
> 62ba568f7aef ("ALSA: pcm: Return 0 when size <
> start_threshold in capture") and fixed in 00a399cad1a0
> ("ALSA: pcm: Revert capture stream behavior change in
> blocking mode"), which prevented the user from starting
> capture from another thread.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Patch "ALSA: pcm: Return 0 when size < start_threshold in capture" has been added to the 4.19-stable tree
2019-09-11 14:14 ` Patch "ALSA: pcm: Return 0 when size < start_threshold in capture" has been added to the 4.19-stable tree Ricardo Biehl Pasquali
2019-09-11 14:20 ` Ricardo Biehl Pasquali
@ 2019-09-11 16:49 ` Sasha Levin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2019-09-11 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ricardo Biehl Pasquali; +Cc: stable
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 11:14:31AM -0300, Ricardo Biehl Pasquali wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 05:30:33AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
>>
>> ALSA: pcm: Return 0 when size < start_threshold in capture
>>
>> to the 4.19-stable tree which can be found at:
>> http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
>>
>> The filename of the patch is:
>> alsa-pcm-return-0-when-size-start_threshold-in-captu.patch
>> and it can be found in the queue-4.19 subdirectory.
>>
>> If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
>> please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>
>Hi Sasha.
>
>This patch was reverted by the commit 932a81519572156a88db
>("ALSA: pcm: Comment why read blocks when PCM is not
>running"):
>
> This avoids bringing back the problem introduced by
> 62ba568f7aef ("ALSA: pcm: Return 0 when size <
> start_threshold in capture") and fixed in 00a399cad1a0
> ("ALSA: pcm: Revert capture stream behavior change in
> blocking mode"), which prevented the user from starting
> capture from another thread.
>
>Should this be queued anyway? If yes, I think it should also
>be queued the fix and the commit above.
Nope, I'll drop it. Thank you.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-09-11 16:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20190911093035.57F102089F@mail.kernel.org>
2019-09-11 14:14 ` Patch "ALSA: pcm: Return 0 when size < start_threshold in capture" has been added to the 4.19-stable tree Ricardo Biehl Pasquali
2019-09-11 14:20 ` Ricardo Biehl Pasquali
2019-09-11 16:49 ` Sasha Levin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).