* Re: Linux 5.3.12 BOOT TEST: Compiled, Booted, everything OK.
[not found] <a02e01c5-635f-60c3-9d27-6c13abda8ffa@gmail.com>
@ 2019-11-21 20:21 ` Greg KH
2019-11-22 15:02 ` Shuah Khan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2019-11-21 20:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel W. S. Almeida; +Cc: stable, skhan, linux-kernel-mentees
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 03:55:34PM -0300, Daniel W. S. Almeida wrote:
> ~ 2hr uptime: no crashes, no new errors on dmesg, everything looks good.
Thanks for testing.
> *This pops up after diffing the output of kselftest though:*
>
> < # ./reuseport_bpf: Unable to open tcp_fastopen sysctl for writing:
> Permission denied
> ---
> > # ./reuseport_bpf: ebpf error. log:
> > # 0: (bf) r6 = r1
> > # 1: (20) r0 = *(u32 *)skb[0]
> > # 2: (97) r0 %= 10
> > # 3: (95) exit
> > # processed 4 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 0
> peak_states 0 mark_read 0
> > #
> > # : Operation not permitted
>
> I did not run kselftest as root. I assume it is nothing noteworthy?
Is this a new issue, or has it always been there?
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Linux 5.3.12 BOOT TEST: Compiled, Booted, everything OK.
2019-11-21 20:21 ` Linux 5.3.12 BOOT TEST: Compiled, Booted, everything OK Greg KH
@ 2019-11-22 15:02 ` Shuah Khan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2019-11-22 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH, Daniel W. S. Almeida; +Cc: stable, linux-kernel-mentees, shuah Khan
On 11/21/19 1:21 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 03:55:34PM -0300, Daniel W. S. Almeida wrote:
>> ~ 2hr uptime: no crashes, no new errors on dmesg, everything looks good.
>
> Thanks for testing.
>
>> *This pops up after diffing the output of kselftest though:*
>>
>> < # ./reuseport_bpf: Unable to open tcp_fastopen sysctl for writing:
>> Permission denied
>> ---
>>> # ./reuseport_bpf: ebpf error. log:
>>> # 0: (bf) r6 = r1
>>> # 1: (20) r0 = *(u32 *)skb[0]
>>> # 2: (97) r0 %= 10
>>> # 3: (95) exit
>>> # processed 4 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 0
>> peak_states 0 mark_read 0
>>> #
>>> # : Operation not permitted
>>
>> I did not run kselftest as root. I assume it is nothing noteworthy?
>
> Is this a new issue, or has it always been there?
>
This is not new issue. Running a root is required based on results
from my test runs.
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-11-22 15:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <a02e01c5-635f-60c3-9d27-6c13abda8ffa@gmail.com>
2019-11-21 20:21 ` Linux 5.3.12 BOOT TEST: Compiled, Booted, everything OK Greg KH
2019-11-22 15:02 ` Shuah Khan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).