[for-linus][PATCH 1/2] ftrace: Fix issue that direct->addr not restored in modify_ftrace_direct()

[for-linus][PATCH 1/2] ftrace: Fix issue that direct->addr not restored in modify_ftrace_direct()

[Steven Rostedt]

From: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian1@huawei.com>

Syzkaller report a WARNING: "WARN_ON(!direct)" in modify_ftrace_direct().

Root cause is 'direct->addr' was changed from 'old_addr' to 'new_addr' but
not restored if error happened on calling ftrace_modify_direct_caller().
Then it can no longer find 'direct' by that 'old_addr'.

To fix it, restore 'direct->addr' to 'old_addr' explicitly in error path.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20230330025223.1046087-1-zhengyejian1@huawei.com

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Fixes: 8a141dd7f706 ("ftrace: Fix modify_ftrace_direct.")
Signed-off-by: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 15 +++++++++------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
index 0feea145bb29..c67bcc89a771 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
@@ -5667,12 +5667,15 @@ int modify_ftrace_direct(unsigned long ip,
 		ret = 0;
 	}
 
-	if (unlikely(ret && new_direct)) {
-		direct->count++;
-		list_del_rcu(&new_direct->next);
-		synchronize_rcu_tasks();
-		kfree(new_direct);
-		ftrace_direct_func_count--;
+	if (ret) {
+		direct->addr = old_addr;
+		if (unlikely(new_direct)) {
+			direct->count++;
+			list_del_rcu(&new_direct->next);
+			synchronize_rcu_tasks();
+			kfree(new_direct);
+			ftrace_direct_func_count--;
+		}
 	}
 
  out_unlock:
-- 
2.39.2