* Re: [PATCH 5.16 000/127] 5.16.8-rc2 review
2022-02-07 14:04 Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2022-02-07 19:55 ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-02-07 21:24 ` Shuah Khan
` (11 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2022-02-07 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
slade
On Mon, 7 Feb 2022 at 19:34, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.8 release.
> There are 127 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 09 Feb 2022 13:38:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.16.8-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.16.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 5.16.8-rc2
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git branch: linux-5.16.y
* git commit: 87d888a197db9443026045ba3c253a1a929114d4
* git describe: v5.16.7-128-g87d888a197db
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.16.y/build/v5.16.7-128-g87d888a197db
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.16.7)
No test regressions found.
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.16.7)
No metric regressions found.
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.16.7)
No test fixes found.
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.16.7)
No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary
total: 103985, pass: 89106, fail: 847, skip: 13204, xfail: 828
## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 259 total, 259 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
* dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed
* juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 52 total, 48 passed, 4 failed
* riscv: 24 total, 20 passed, 4 failed
* s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* fwts
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-bpf
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-lkdtm
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* prep-tmp-disk
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.16 000/127] 5.16.8-rc2 review
2022-02-07 14:04 Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-02-07 19:55 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2022-02-07 21:24 ` Shuah Khan
2022-02-07 22:22 ` Guenter Roeck
` (10 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2022-02-07 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
Cc: stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, slade,
Shuah Khan
On 2/7/22 7:04 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.8 release.
> There are 127 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 09 Feb 2022 13:38:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.16.8-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.16.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.16 000/127] 5.16.8-rc2 review
2022-02-07 14:04 Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-02-07 19:55 ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-02-07 21:24 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2022-02-07 22:22 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-02-07 22:34 ` Justin Forbes
` (9 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2022-02-07 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, stable, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
slade
On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 03:04:44PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.8 release.
> There are 127 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 09 Feb 2022 13:38:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 155 pass: 155 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 488 pass: 488 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.16 000/127] 5.16.8-rc2 review
2022-02-07 14:04 Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-02-07 22:22 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2022-02-07 22:34 ` Justin Forbes
2022-02-08 1:57 ` Zan Aziz
` (8 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Justin Forbes @ 2022-02-07 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
slade
On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 03:04:44PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.8 release.
> There are 127 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 09 Feb 2022 13:38:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.16.8-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.16.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Tested rc2 against the Fedora build system (aarch64, armv7, ppc64le,
s390x, x86_64), and boot tested x86_64. No regressions noted.
Tested-by: Justin M. Forbes <jforbes@fedoraproject.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.16 000/127] 5.16.8-rc2 review
2022-02-07 14:04 Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-02-07 22:34 ` Justin Forbes
@ 2022-02-08 1:57 ` Zan Aziz
2022-02-08 2:47 ` Florian Fainelli
` (7 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Zan Aziz @ 2022-02-08 1:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
slade
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 8:18 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.8 release.
> There are 127 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 09 Feb 2022 13:38:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.16.8-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.16.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Hi Greg,
Compiled and booted on my test system Lenovo P50s: Intel Core i7
No emergency and critical messages in the dmesg
./perf bench sched all
# Running sched/messaging benchmark...
# 20 sender and receiver processes per group
# 10 groups == 400 processes run
Total time: 0.449 [sec]
# Running sched/pipe benchmark...
# Executed 1000000 pipe operations between two processes
Total time: 9.039 [sec]
9.039568 usecs/op
110624 ops/sec
Tested-by: Zan Aziz <zanaziz313@gmail.com>
Thanks
-Zan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.16 000/127] 5.16.8-rc2 review
2022-02-07 14:04 Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-02-08 1:57 ` Zan Aziz
@ 2022-02-08 2:47 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-02-08 7:03 ` Slade Watkins
` (6 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2022-02-08 2:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
Cc: stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, slade
On 2/7/22 6:04 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.8 release.
> There are 127 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 09 Feb 2022 13:38:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.16.8-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.16.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.16 000/127] 5.16.8-rc2 review
2022-02-07 14:04 Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2022-02-08 2:47 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2022-02-08 7:03 ` Slade Watkins
2022-02-08 8:31 ` Bagas Sanjaya
` (5 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Slade Watkins @ 2022-02-08 7:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
Cc: stable, Linus Torvalds, Andrew Morton, Guenter Roeck, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, Pavel Machek, Jon Hunter, Florian Fainelli,
Sudip Mukherjee
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022, at 9:04 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.8 release.
> There are 127 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 09 Feb 2022 13:38:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Compiled and booted 5.16.8-rc2 on my x86_64 test system successfully without errors or regressions.
Tested-by: Slade Watkins <slade@sladewatkins.com>
Thanks,
Slade
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.16 000/127] 5.16.8-rc2 review
2022-02-07 14:04 Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2022-02-08 7:03 ` Slade Watkins
@ 2022-02-08 8:31 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2022-02-08 8:31 ` Jon Hunter
` (4 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Bagas Sanjaya @ 2022-02-08 8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
Cc: stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, slade
On 07/02/22 21.04, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.8 release.
> There are 127 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, gcc 10.2.0)
and powerpc (ps3_defconfig, gcc 11.2.0).
Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.16 000/127] 5.16.8-rc2 review
2022-02-07 14:04 Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2022-02-08 8:31 ` Bagas Sanjaya
@ 2022-02-08 8:31 ` Jon Hunter
2022-02-08 9:02 ` Ron Economos
` (3 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2022-02-08 8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, slade, linux-tegra
On Mon, 07 Feb 2022 15:04:44 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.8 release.
> There are 127 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 09 Feb 2022 13:38:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.16.8-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.16.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.16:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
122 tests: 122 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.16.8-rc2-g87d888a197db
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.16 000/127] 5.16.8-rc2 review
2022-02-07 14:04 Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2022-02-08 8:31 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2022-02-08 9:02 ` Ron Economos
2022-02-08 10:30 ` Rudi Heitbaum
` (2 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2022-02-08 9:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
Cc: stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, slade
On 2/7/22 06:04, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.8 release.
> There are 127 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 09 Feb 2022 13:38:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.16.8-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.16.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.16 000/127] 5.16.8-rc2 review
2022-02-07 14:04 Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2022-02-08 9:02 ` Ron Economos
@ 2022-02-08 10:30 ` Rudi Heitbaum
2022-02-08 11:34 ` Scott Bruce
2022-02-08 13:30 ` Fox Chen
12 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Rudi Heitbaum @ 2022-02-08 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
slade
On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 03:04:44PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.8 release.
> There are 127 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 09 Feb 2022 13:38:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Hi Greg,
5.16.8-rc2 tested.
Run tested on:
- Allwinner H6 (Tanix TX6)
- Intel Tiger Lake x86_64 (nuc11 i7-1165G7)
In addition - build tested on:
- Allwinner A64
- Allwinner H3
- Allwinner H5
- NXP iMX6
- NXP iMX8
- Qualcomm Dragonboard
- Rockchip RK3288
- Rockchip RK3328
- Rockchip RK3399pro
- Samsung Exynos
Tested-by: Rudi Heitbaum <rudi@heitbaum.com>
--
Rudi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.16 000/127] 5.16.8-rc2 review
2022-02-07 14:04 Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2022-02-08 10:30 ` Rudi Heitbaum
@ 2022-02-08 11:34 ` Scott Bruce
2022-02-08 13:30 ` Fox Chen
12 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Scott Bruce @ 2022-02-08 11:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
Cc: stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, slade
On 2/7/22 06:04, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.8 release.
> There are 127 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 09 Feb 2022 13:38:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.16.8-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.16.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Build, dmesg, desktop use and s0ix suspend all look good on x86_64/Cezanne (ASUS GA503QR.)
Tested-by: Scott Bruce <smbruce@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH 5.16 000/127] 5.16.8-rc2 review
2022-02-07 14:04 Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2022-02-08 11:34 ` Scott Bruce
@ 2022-02-08 13:30 ` Fox Chen
12 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Fox Chen @ 2022-02-08 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, slade, Fox Chen
On Mon, 7 Feb 2022 15:04:44 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.8 release.
> There are 127 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 09 Feb 2022 13:38:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.16.8-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.16.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
5.16.8-rc2 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711)
Tested-by: Fox Chen <foxhlchen@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread