stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH V2] kvm: check tlbs_dirty directly
       [not found] <ea0938d2-f766-99de-2019-9daf5798ccac@redhat.com>
@ 2020-12-15 14:52 ` Lai Jiangshan
  2020-12-15 18:44   ` Sean Christopherson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Lai Jiangshan @ 2020-12-15 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, kvm
  Cc: Paolo Bonzini, Sean Christopherson, Lai Jiangshan, stable

From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>

In kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(), tlbs_dirty is used as:
        need_tlb_flush |= kvm->tlbs_dirty;
with need_tlb_flush's type being int and tlbs_dirty's type being long.

It means that tlbs_dirty is always used as int and the higher 32 bits
is useless.  We need to check tlbs_dirty in a correct way and this
change checks it directly without propagating it to need_tlb_flush.

And need_tlb_flush is changed to boolean because it is used as a
boolean and its name starts with "need".

Note: it's _extremely_ unlikely this neglecting of higher 32 bits can
cause problems in practice.  It would require encountering tlbs_dirty
on a 4 billion count boundary, and KVM would need to be using shadow
paging or be running a nested guest.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: a4ee1ca4a36e ("KVM: MMU: delay flush all tlbs on sync_page path")
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
---
Changed from V1:
	Update the patch and the changelog as Sean Christopherson suggested.

 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 2541a17ff1c4..1c17f3d073cb 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -470,7 +470,8 @@ static int kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
 					const struct mmu_notifier_range *range)
 {
 	struct kvm *kvm = mmu_notifier_to_kvm(mn);
-	int need_tlb_flush = 0, idx;
+	int idx;
+	bool need_tlb_flush;
 
 	idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
 	spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
@@ -480,11 +481,10 @@ static int kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
 	 * count is also read inside the mmu_lock critical section.
 	 */
 	kvm->mmu_notifier_count++;
-	need_tlb_flush = kvm_unmap_hva_range(kvm, range->start, range->end,
-					     range->flags);
-	need_tlb_flush |= kvm->tlbs_dirty;
+	need_tlb_flush = !!kvm_unmap_hva_range(kvm, range->start, range->end,
+					       range->flags);
 	/* we've to flush the tlb before the pages can be freed */
-	if (need_tlb_flush)
+	if (need_tlb_flush || kvm->tlbs_dirty)
 		kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
 
 	spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
-- 
2.19.1.6.gb485710b


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] kvm: check tlbs_dirty directly
  2020-12-15 14:52 ` [PATCH V2] kvm: check tlbs_dirty directly Lai Jiangshan
@ 2020-12-15 18:44   ` Sean Christopherson
  2020-12-16  9:46     ` Greg KH
                       ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sean Christopherson @ 2020-12-15 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lai Jiangshan; +Cc: linux-kernel, kvm, Paolo Bonzini, Lai Jiangshan, stable

Note, you don't actually need to Cc stable@vger.kernel.org when sending the
patch.  If/when the patch is merged to Linus' tree, the stable tree maintainers,
or more accurately their scripts, will automatically pick up the patch and apply
it to the relevant stable trees.

You'll probably be getting the following letter from Greg KH any time now :-)

<formletter>

This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree.  Please read:
    https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.

</formletter>


On Tue, Dec 15, 2020, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
> 
> In kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(), tlbs_dirty is used as:
>         need_tlb_flush |= kvm->tlbs_dirty;
> with need_tlb_flush's type being int and tlbs_dirty's type being long.
> 
> It means that tlbs_dirty is always used as int and the higher 32 bits
> is useless.  We need to check tlbs_dirty in a correct way and this
> change checks it directly without propagating it to need_tlb_flush.
> 
> And need_tlb_flush is changed to boolean because it is used as a
> boolean and its name starts with "need".
> 
> Note: it's _extremely_ unlikely this neglecting of higher 32 bits can
> cause problems in practice.  It would require encountering tlbs_dirty
> on a 4 billion count boundary, and KVM would need to be using shadow
> paging or be running a nested guest.
> 
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: a4ee1ca4a36e ("KVM: MMU: delay flush all tlbs on sync_page path")
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> Changed from V1:
> 	Update the patch and the changelog as Sean Christopherson suggested.
> 
>  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 2541a17ff1c4..1c17f3d073cb 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -470,7 +470,8 @@ static int kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
>  					const struct mmu_notifier_range *range)
>  {
>  	struct kvm *kvm = mmu_notifier_to_kvm(mn);
> -	int need_tlb_flush = 0, idx;
> +	int idx;
> +	bool need_tlb_flush;

It's a bit silly given how small this patch already is, but I do think this
should be split into two patches so that the kvm->tlbs_dirty bug fix is fully
isolated for backporting.  I.e. patch 1/2 would simply be:

diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 3abcb2ce5b7d..19dae28904f7 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -485,9 +485,8 @@ static int kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
        kvm->mmu_notifier_count++;
        need_tlb_flush = kvm_unmap_hva_range(kvm, range->start, range->end,
                                             range->flags);
-       need_tlb_flush |= kvm->tlbs_dirty;
        /* we've to flush the tlb before the pages can be freed */
-       if (need_tlb_flush)
+       if (need_tlb_flush || kvm->tlbs_dirty)
                kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);

        spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);

>  
>  	idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
>  	spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> @@ -480,11 +481,10 @@ static int kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
>  	 * count is also read inside the mmu_lock critical section.
>  	 */
>  	kvm->mmu_notifier_count++;
> -	need_tlb_flush = kvm_unmap_hva_range(kvm, range->start, range->end,
> -					     range->flags);
> -	need_tlb_flush |= kvm->tlbs_dirty;
> +	need_tlb_flush = !!kvm_unmap_hva_range(kvm, range->start, range->end,
> +					       range->flags);
>  	/* we've to flush the tlb before the pages can be freed */
> -	if (need_tlb_flush)
> +	if (need_tlb_flush || kvm->tlbs_dirty)
>  		kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
>  
>  	spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> -- 
> 2.19.1.6.gb485710b
> 

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] kvm: check tlbs_dirty directly
  2020-12-15 18:44   ` Sean Christopherson
@ 2020-12-16  9:46     ` Greg KH
  2020-12-16 16:37     ` Paolo Bonzini
  2020-12-17 15:41     ` [PATCH V3] " Lai Jiangshan
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2020-12-16  9:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sean Christopherson
  Cc: Lai Jiangshan, linux-kernel, kvm, Paolo Bonzini, Lai Jiangshan, stable

On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 10:44:18AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Note, you don't actually need to Cc stable@vger.kernel.org when sending the
> patch.  If/when the patch is merged to Linus' tree, the stable tree maintainers,
> or more accurately their scripts, will automatically pick up the patch and apply
> it to the relevant stable trees.
> 
> You'll probably be getting the following letter from Greg KH any time now :-)

Nope, this was fine, I don't mind seeing the patch before it hits
Linus's tree (or any tree) at all.  It lets me know what to look out
for, nothing was done incorrectly here at all from what I can tell.

thanks,

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] kvm: check tlbs_dirty directly
  2020-12-15 18:44   ` Sean Christopherson
  2020-12-16  9:46     ` Greg KH
@ 2020-12-16 16:37     ` Paolo Bonzini
  2020-12-17 15:41     ` [PATCH V3] " Lai Jiangshan
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2020-12-16 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sean Christopherson, Lai Jiangshan
  Cc: linux-kernel, kvm, Lai Jiangshan, stable

On 15/12/20 19:44, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Note, you don't actually need to Ccstable@vger.kernel.org  when sending the
> patch.  If/when the patch is merged to Linus' tree, the stable tree maintainers,
> or more accurately their scripts, will automatically pick up the patch and apply
> it to the relevant stable trees.
> 
> You'll probably be getting the following letter from Greg KH any time now:-)
> 
> <formletter>
> 
> This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
> stable kernel tree.  Please read:
>      https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
> for how to do this properly.
> 
> </formletter>

As far as I know, as long as he sees LKML or something else in Cc he 
assumes it's an indication _for the maintainer_.  Don't underestimate 
the power of Greg's mailing list filters. :)

Paolo


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V3] kvm: check tlbs_dirty directly
  2020-12-15 18:44   ` Sean Christopherson
  2020-12-16  9:46     ` Greg KH
  2020-12-16 16:37     ` Paolo Bonzini
@ 2020-12-17 15:41     ` Lai Jiangshan
  2020-12-21 18:31       ` Paolo Bonzini
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Lai Jiangshan @ 2020-12-17 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, kvm
  Cc: Paolo Bonzini, Sean Christopherson, Lai Jiangshan, stable

From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>

In kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(), tlbs_dirty is used as:
        need_tlb_flush |= kvm->tlbs_dirty;
with need_tlb_flush's type being int and tlbs_dirty's type being long.

It means that tlbs_dirty is always used as int and the higher 32 bits
is useless.  We need to check tlbs_dirty in a correct way and this
change checks it directly without propagating it to need_tlb_flush.

Note: it's _extremely_ unlikely this neglecting of higher 32 bits can
cause problems in practice.  It would require encountering tlbs_dirty
on a 4 billion count boundary, and KVM would need to be using shadow
paging or be running a nested guest.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: a4ee1ca4a36e ("KVM: MMU: delay flush all tlbs on sync_page path")
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
---
Changed from V1:
        Update the patch and the changelog as Sean Christopherson suggested.

Changed from v2:
	don't change the type of need_tlb_flush

 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 2541a17ff1c4..3083fb53861d 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -482,9 +482,8 @@ static int kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
 	kvm->mmu_notifier_count++;
 	need_tlb_flush = kvm_unmap_hva_range(kvm, range->start, range->end,
 					     range->flags);
-	need_tlb_flush |= kvm->tlbs_dirty;
 	/* we've to flush the tlb before the pages can be freed */
-	if (need_tlb_flush)
+	if (need_tlb_flush || kvm->tlbs_dirty)
 		kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
 
 	spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
-- 
2.19.1.6.gb485710b


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V3] kvm: check tlbs_dirty directly
  2020-12-17 15:41     ` [PATCH V3] " Lai Jiangshan
@ 2020-12-21 18:31       ` Paolo Bonzini
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2020-12-21 18:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lai Jiangshan, linux-kernel, kvm
  Cc: Sean Christopherson, Lai Jiangshan, stable

On 17/12/20 16:41, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
> 
> In kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(), tlbs_dirty is used as:
>          need_tlb_flush |= kvm->tlbs_dirty;
> with need_tlb_flush's type being int and tlbs_dirty's type being long.
> 
> It means that tlbs_dirty is always used as int and the higher 32 bits
> is useless.  We need to check tlbs_dirty in a correct way and this
> change checks it directly without propagating it to need_tlb_flush.
> 
> Note: it's _extremely_ unlikely this neglecting of higher 32 bits can
> cause problems in practice.  It would require encountering tlbs_dirty
> on a 4 billion count boundary, and KVM would need to be using shadow
> paging or be running a nested guest.
> 
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: a4ee1ca4a36e ("KVM: MMU: delay flush all tlbs on sync_page path")
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> Changed from V1:
>          Update the patch and the changelog as Sean Christopherson suggested.
> 
> Changed from v2:
> 	don't change the type of need_tlb_flush
> 
>   virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 3 +--
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 2541a17ff1c4..3083fb53861d 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -482,9 +482,8 @@ static int kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
>   	kvm->mmu_notifier_count++;
>   	need_tlb_flush = kvm_unmap_hva_range(kvm, range->start, range->end,
>   					     range->flags);
> -	need_tlb_flush |= kvm->tlbs_dirty;
>   	/* we've to flush the tlb before the pages can be freed */
> -	if (need_tlb_flush)
> +	if (need_tlb_flush || kvm->tlbs_dirty)
>   		kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
>   
>   	spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> 

Queued, thanks.

Paolo


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-12-21 18:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <ea0938d2-f766-99de-2019-9daf5798ccac@redhat.com>
2020-12-15 14:52 ` [PATCH V2] kvm: check tlbs_dirty directly Lai Jiangshan
2020-12-15 18:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2020-12-16  9:46     ` Greg KH
2020-12-16 16:37     ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-12-17 15:41     ` [PATCH V3] " Lai Jiangshan
2020-12-21 18:31       ` Paolo Bonzini

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).