* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/36] 5.4.170-rc2 review
2022-01-04 7:40 [PATCH 5.4 00/36] 5.4.170-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2022-01-04 11:13 ` Jon Hunter
2022-01-04 18:13 ` Florian Fainelli
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2022-01-04 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable, linux-tegra
On Tue, 04 Jan 2022 08:40:58 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.170 release.
> There are 36 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 06 Jan 2022 07:38:29 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.170-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.4:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
59 tests: 59 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.4.170-rc2-g80ddcc564ae9
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana,
tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/36] 5.4.170-rc2 review
2022-01-04 7:40 [PATCH 5.4 00/36] 5.4.170-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-01-04 11:13 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2022-01-04 18:13 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-01-05 1:28 ` Guenter Roeck
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2022-01-04 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
Cc: torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel,
jonathanh, stable
On 1/3/22 11:40 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.170 release.
> There are 36 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 06 Jan 2022 07:38:29 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.170-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/36] 5.4.170-rc2 review
2022-01-04 7:40 [PATCH 5.4 00/36] 5.4.170-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-01-04 11:13 ` Jon Hunter
2022-01-04 18:13 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2022-01-05 1:28 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-01-05 2:17 ` Shuah Khan
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2022-01-05 1:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel,
jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable
On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 08:40:58AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.170 release.
> There are 36 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 06 Jan 2022 07:38:29 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 157 pass: 157 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 444 pass: 444 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/36] 5.4.170-rc2 review
2022-01-04 7:40 [PATCH 5.4 00/36] 5.4.170-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-05 1:28 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2022-01-05 2:17 ` Shuah Khan
2022-01-05 3:36 ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-01-05 9:36 ` Sudip Mukherjee
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2022-01-05 2:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
Cc: torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel,
jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable, Shuah Khan
On 1/4/22 12:40 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.170 release.
> There are 36 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 06 Jan 2022 07:38:29 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.170-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/36] 5.4.170-rc2 review
2022-01-04 7:40 [PATCH 5.4 00/36] 5.4.170-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-05 2:17 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2022-01-05 3:36 ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-01-05 9:36 ` Sudip Mukherjee
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2022-01-05 3:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable
On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 at 13:11, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.170 release.
> There are 36 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 06 Jan 2022 07:38:29 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.170-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 5.4.170-rc2
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git branch: linux-5.4.y
* git commit: 80ddcc564ae91afb9de54b43ffb4b2167a7306a3
* git describe: v5.4.169-37-g80ddcc564ae9
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.4.y/build/v5.4.169-37-g80ddcc564ae9
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.4.169)
No test regressions found.
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.4.169)
No metric regressions found.
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.4.169)
No test fixes found.
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.4.169)
No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary
total: 89585, pass: 74682, fail: 752, skip: 12738, xfail: 1413
## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 258 total, 254 passed, 4 failed
* arm64: 36 total, 31 passed, 5 failed
* dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 20 total, 20 passed, 0 failed
* juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 52 total, 48 passed, 4 failed
* riscv: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* fwts
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-bpf
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/36] 5.4.170-rc2 review
2022-01-04 7:40 [PATCH 5.4 00/36] 5.4.170-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-05 3:36 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2022-01-05 9:36 ` Sudip Mukherjee
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sudip Mukherjee @ 2022-01-05 9:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable
Hi Greg,
On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 08:40:58AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.170 release.
> There are 36 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 06 Jan 2022 07:38:29 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20211214): 65 configs -> no new failure
arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20211214): 107 configs -> no new failure
arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211214): 2 configs -> no failure
x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211214): 4 configs -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/587
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread