stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Wheeler <bcache@lists.ewheeler.net>
To: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcache: back to cache all readahead I/Os
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 22:57:40 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.11.2001062256450.2074@mx.ewheeler.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200104065802.113137-1-colyli@suse.de>

On Sat, 4 Jan 2020, Coly Li wrote:

> In year 2007 high performance SSD was still expensive, in order to
> save more space for real workload or meta data, the readahead I/Os
> for non-meta data was bypassed and not cached on SSD.
> 
> In now days, SSD price drops a lot and people can find larger size
> SSD with more comfortable price. It is unncessary to bypass normal
> readahead I/Os to save SSD space for now.
> 
> This patch removes the code which checks REQ_RAHEAD tag of bio in
> check_should_bypass(), then all readahead I/Os will be cached on SSD.
> 
> NOTE: this patch still keeps the checking of "REQ_META|REQ_PRIO" in
> should_writeback(), because we still want to cache meta data I/Os
> even they are asynchronized.
> 
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
> Cc: Eric Wheeler <bcache@linux.ewheeler.net>

Acked-by: Eric Wheeler <bcache@linux.ewheeler.net>


> ---
>  drivers/md/bcache/request.c | 9 ---------
>  1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
> index 73478a91a342..acc07c4f27ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
> @@ -378,15 +378,6 @@ static bool check_should_bypass(struct cached_dev *dc, struct bio *bio)
>  	     op_is_write(bio_op(bio))))
>  		goto skip;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Flag for bypass if the IO is for read-ahead or background,
> -	 * unless the read-ahead request is for metadata
> -	 * (eg, for gfs2 or xfs).
> -	 */
> -	if (bio->bi_opf & (REQ_RAHEAD|REQ_BACKGROUND) &&
> -	    !(bio->bi_opf & (REQ_META|REQ_PRIO)))
> -		goto skip;
> -
>  	if (bio->bi_iter.bi_sector & (c->sb.block_size - 1) ||
>  	    bio_sectors(bio) & (c->sb.block_size - 1)) {
>  		pr_debug("skipping unaligned io");
> -- 
> 2.16.4
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-06 23:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-04  6:58 [PATCH] bcache: back to cache all readahead I/Os Coly Li
2020-01-06 22:57 ` Eric Wheeler [this message]
2020-01-14 12:34   ` Nix
2020-01-15  6:21     ` Coly Li
2020-01-15 12:39       ` Nix
2020-01-16  0:00         ` Coly Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LRH.2.11.2001062256450.2074@mx.ewheeler.net \
    --to=bcache@lists.ewheeler.net \
    --cc=colyli@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).