[PATCH 1/4] sheepdog: prevent double locking during inode reload

* [PATCH 1/4] sheepdog: prevent double locking during inode reload
@ 2015-07-20  6:59 Hitoshi Mitake
  2015-07-20  6:59 ` [PATCH 2/4] sheepdog: serialize overwrapping request Hitoshi Mitake
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hitoshi Mitake @ 2015-07-20  6:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stgt; +Cc: sheepdog, Hitoshi Mitake, Teruaki Ishizaki

The commit 0c531dfe18f9b2af made the lock protecting on memory inode
object finer grain and improved performacne, but it also introduced a
possibility of double locking single VDI.

The problem can arise in this sequence:
1. both of thread A and B issues write request to a VDI
2. user make a snapshot of the VDI
3. the VDI is now readonly snapshot, sheep returns SD_RES_READONLY
4. both of A and B calls find_vdi_name() for obtaining a new ID of
   working VDI, it results double locking

This patch resolves the problem. Each thread has a version number of
inode object in its TLS. Acess info struct also has the number. When
the thread needs to reload the inode object, it check the number with
the one of the access info first. If they differ, it means no other
threads reloaded the object. If not, it means other thread already
reloaded, so the thread doesn't call find_vdi_name() and double
locking can be avoided.

Cc: Teruaki Ishizaki <ishizaki.teruaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake.hitoshi@lab.ntt.co.jp>
---
 usr/bs_sheepdog.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/usr/bs_sheepdog.c b/usr/bs_sheepdog.c
index cfaf48b..21d7dac 100644
--- a/usr/bs_sheepdog.c
+++ b/usr/bs_sheepdog.c
@@ -291,6 +291,9 @@ struct sheepdog_access_info {
 
 	struct sheepdog_inode inode;
 	pthread_rwlock_t inode_lock;
+
+	pthread_mutex_t inode_version_mutex;
+	uint64_t inode_version;
 };
 
 static inline int is_data_obj_writeable(struct sheepdog_inode *inode,
@@ -656,37 +659,58 @@ static int read_object(struct sheepdog_access_info *ai, char *buf, uint64_t oid,
 
 static int reload_inode(struct sheepdog_access_info *ai, int is_snapshot)
 {
-	int ret, need_reload = 0;
+	int ret = 0, need_reload = 0;
 	char tag[SD_MAX_VDI_TAG_LEN];
 	uint32_t vid;
 
+	static __thread uint64_t inode_version;
+
+	pthread_mutex_lock(&ai->inode_version_mutex);
+
+	if (inode_version != ai->inode_version) {
+		/* some other threads reloaded inode */
+		inode_version = ai->inode_version;
+		goto ret;
+	}
+
 	if (is_snapshot) {
 		memset(tag, 0, sizeof(tag));
 
 		ret = find_vdi_name(ai, ai->inode.name, CURRENT_VDI_ID, tag,
 				    &vid, 0);
-		if (ret)
-			return -1;
+		if (ret) {
+			ret = -1;
+			goto ret;
+		}
 
 		ret = read_object(ai, (char *)&ai->inode, vid_to_vdi_oid(vid),
 				  ai->inode.nr_copies,
 				  offsetof(struct sheepdog_inode, data_vdi_id),
 				  0, &need_reload);
-		if (ret)
-			return -1;
+		if (ret) {
+			ret = -1;
+			goto ret;
+		}
 	} else {
 		ret = read_object(ai, (char *)&ai->inode,
 				  vid_to_vdi_oid(ai->inode.vdi_id),
 				  ai->inode.nr_copies, SD_INODE_SIZE, 0,
 				  &need_reload);
-		if (ret)
-			return -1;
+		if (ret) {
+			ret = -1;
+			goto ret;
+		}
 	}
 
 	ai->min_dirty_data_idx = UINT32_MAX;
 	ai->max_dirty_data_idx = 0;
 
-	return 0;
+	inode_version++;
+	ai->inode_version = inode_version;
+
+ret:
+	pthread_mutex_unlock(&ai->inode_version_mutex);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static int read_write_object(struct sheepdog_access_info *ai, char *buf,
@@ -1426,6 +1450,7 @@ static tgtadm_err bs_sheepdog_init(struct scsi_lu *lu, char *bsopts)
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ai->fd_list_head);
 	pthread_rwlock_init(&ai->fd_list_lock, NULL);
 	pthread_rwlock_init(&ai->inode_lock, NULL);
+	pthread_mutex_init(&ai->inode_version_mutex, NULL);
 
 	return bs_thread_open(info, bs_sheepdog_request, nr_iothreads);
 }
-- 
1.9.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread