u-boot.lists.denx.de archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@maquefel.me>
To: Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com>
Cc: linux@yadro.com, Nikita Shubin <n.shubin@yadro.com>,
	Rick Chen <rick@andestech.com>, Leo <ycliang@andestech.com>,
	Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>,
	Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
	Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>,
	Sergei Miroshnichenko <s.miroshnichenko@yadro.com>,
	Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>,
	Alper Nebi Yasak <alpernebiyasak@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>,
	u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] spl: introduce SPL_XIP to config
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 10:27:07 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220815102707.7215495c@redslave.neermore.group> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9afeff6a-07f3-a951-c083-da8ad77a5031@gmail.com>

Hello Sean!

On Sat, 13 Aug 2022 00:35:59 -0400
Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Nikita,
> 
> On 8/11/22 5:37 AM, Nikita Shubin wrote:
> > From: Nikita Shubin <n.shubin@yadro.com>
> > 
> > U-Boot and SPL don't necessary share the same location, so we might
> > end with XIP SPL and U-Boot in "normal" memory.
> > 
> > This adds an option special for SPL to behave it in XIP manner and
> > don't use hart_lottery and available_harts_lock.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Nikita Shubin <n.shubin@yadro.com>
> > ---  
> 
> On a stylistic note, typically cover letters are not used for single
> patches (but feel free to use them for larger series).
> 
> >   arch/riscv/cpu/cpu.c                 | 2 +-
> >   arch/riscv/cpu/start.S               | 4 ++--
> >   arch/riscv/include/asm/global_data.h | 2 +-
> >   arch/riscv/lib/asm-offsets.c         | 2 +-
> >   arch/riscv/lib/smp.c                 | 2 +-
> >   common/spl/Kconfig                   | 5 +++++
> >   include/configs/scr7_vcu118.h        | 2 ++
> >   7 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/cpu/cpu.c b/arch/riscv/cpu/cpu.c
> > index 9f5fa0bcb3..89528748d7 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/cpu/cpu.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/cpu/cpu.c
> > @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
> >    * The variables here must be stored in the data section since
> > they are used
> >    * before the bss section is available.
> >    */
> > -#ifndef CONFIG_XIP
> > +#if !defined(CONFIG_XIP) && !defined(CONFIG_SPL_XIP)  
> Shouldn't this be
> 
> #if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(XIP)
> 
> ?
> 
> ditto for the rest of these

I think you are right, i am a bit confused with CONFIG vs
CONFIG_IS_ENABLED.

> 
> >   u32 hart_lottery __section(".data") = 0;
> >   
> >   /*
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/cpu/start.S b/arch/riscv/cpu/start.S
> > index 26cb877ed1..d824990778 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/cpu/start.S
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/cpu/start.S
> > @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ call_board_init_f_0:
> >   call_harts_early_init:
> >   	jal	harts_early_init
> >   
> > -#ifndef CONFIG_XIP
> > +#if !defined(CONFIG_XIP) && !defined(CONFIG_SPL_XIP)
> >   	/*
> >   	 * Pick hart to initialize global data and run U-Boot.
> > The other harts
> >   	 * wait for initialization to complete.
> > @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ call_harts_early_init:
> >   	/* save the boot hart id to global_data */
> >   	SREG	tp, GD_BOOT_HART(gp)
> >   
> > -#ifndef CONFIG_XIP
> > +#if !defined(CONFIG_XIP) && !defined(CONFIG_SPL_XIP)
> >   	la	t0, available_harts_lock
> >   	amoswap.w.rl zero, zero, 0(t0)
> >   
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/global_data.h
> > b/arch/riscv/include/asm/global_data.h index 9a146d1d49..d71e09c5ab
> > 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/global_data.h
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/global_data.h
> > @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ int iccm[CONFIG_NR_CPUS];
> >   #if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(SMP)
> >   	struct ipi_data ipi[CONFIG_NR_CPUS];
> >   #endif
> > -#ifndef CONFIG_XIP
> > +#if !defined(CONFIG_XIP) && !defined(CONFIG_SPL_XIP)
> >   	ulong available_harts;
> >   #endif
> >   };
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/lib/asm-offsets.c
> > b/arch/riscv/lib/asm-offsets.c index f1fe089b3d..bcb3c78654 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/lib/asm-offsets.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/lib/asm-offsets.c
> > @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ int main(void)
> >   {
> >   	DEFINE(GD_BOOT_HART, offsetof(gd_t, arch.boot_hart));
> >   	DEFINE(GD_FIRMWARE_FDT_ADDR, offsetof(gd_t,
> > arch.firmware_fdt_addr)); -#ifndef CONFIG_XIP
> > +#if !defined(CONFIG_XIP) && !defined(CONFIG_SPL_XIP)
> >   	DEFINE(GD_AVAILABLE_HARTS, offsetof(gd_t,
> > arch.available_harts)); #endif
> >   
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/lib/smp.c b/arch/riscv/lib/smp.c
> > index ba992100ad..cef324954c 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/lib/smp.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/lib/smp.c
> > @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static int send_ipi_many(struct ipi_data *ipi,
> > int wait) continue;
> >   		}
> >   
> > -#ifndef CONFIG_XIP
> > +#if !defined(CONFIG_XIP) && !defined(CONFIG_SPL_XIP)
> >   		/* skip if hart is not available */
> >   		if (!(gd->arch.available_harts & (1 << reg)))
> >   			continue;
> > diff --git a/common/spl/Kconfig b/common/spl/Kconfig
> > index 07c03d611d..f24e423fc0 100644
> > --- a/common/spl/Kconfig
> > +++ b/common/spl/Kconfig
> > @@ -27,6 +27,11 @@ config SPL_FRAMEWORK
> >   	  supports MMC, NAND and YMODEM and other methods loading
> > of U-Boot and the Linux Kernel.  If unsure, say Y.
> >   
> > +config SPL_XIP
> > +	bool "Support SPL in XIP"
> > +	help
> > +	  Enable this if SPL is in XIP memory.  
> 
> Can you add another sentence or two? What is "XIP memory"? How does
> it differ from the standard boot process?

In this case i treat "XIP memory" as RO memory, if CONFIG_XIP is enabled
(at least for riscv start.S) we don't use such variables as
hart_lottery or available_harts_lock, both are locks. The problem is
that CONFIG_XIP also propagate to main U-Boot, not only SPL.

For example arch/riscv/cpu/start.S:
```
#ifndef CONFIG_XIP
	la	t0, hart_lottery
	li	t1, 1
	amoswap.w s2, t1, 0(t0)
	bnez	s2, wait_for_gd_init
#else
	mv	gp, s0
	bnez	tp, secondary_hart_loop
#endif
```

where tp contains hartid, so we just skip it and all harts with
non-zero hartid's goto secondary_hart_loop.

But if we are loading main U-Boot to RAM - this doesn't make sense for
us since only SPL is in RO memory.

> 
> Also, it seems like we already have SPL_XIP_SUPPORT. Maybe we can
> reuse that?

AFAIK this is different, it's just used to indicate that coping U-Boot
or kernel is not required if they are located in execute in place
capable flash memory.

> 
> >   config SPL_FRAMEWORK_BOARD_INIT_F
> >   	bool "Define a generic function board_init_f"
> >   	depends on SPL_FRAMEWORK
> > diff --git a/include/configs/scr7_vcu118.h
> > b/include/configs/scr7_vcu118.h index 34545255d1..8f3ba36ce1 100644
> > --- a/include/configs/scr7_vcu118.h
> > +++ b/include/configs/scr7_vcu118.h
> > @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@
> >   #define SCR7_OCRAM_REGION_SIZE		0xffff
> >   
> >   #define SCR7L2_CACHE                    1
> > +
> > +#define CONFIG_SYS_UBOOT_BASE           CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE
> >   #endif
> >   
> >   #define CONFIG_SYS_FLASH_BASE           0x00000fffff030000
> >   
> 
> What is this part doing? It's not mentioned in the commit message.

It doesn't have any relation to main part - my bad - a bit relaxed due
to this being an RFC, sorry.

> 
> --Sean


  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-15  7:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-11  9:37 [RFC PATCH 0/1] spl: introduce SPL_XIP to config Nikita Shubin
2022-08-11  9:37 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] " Nikita Shubin
2022-08-13  4:35   ` Sean Anderson
2022-08-15  7:27     ` Nikita Shubin [this message]
2022-08-23  4:25       ` Sean Anderson
2022-08-26  8:44         ` [PATCH] " Nikita Shubin
2022-08-26 14:10           ` Sean Anderson
2022-08-31  7:25             ` [PATCH v2] " Nikita Shubin
     [not found]               ` <HK0PR03MB2994C85219E6217F7F9F4A05C17A9@HK0PR03MB2994.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com>
2022-09-02  7:25                 ` Rick Chen
2022-09-02  8:42                   ` Nikita Shubin
2022-09-02  8:47                   ` [PATCH v3] " Nikita Shubin
     [not found]                     ` <HK0PR03MB29942A55774ED60C5568E72CC17F9@HK0PR03MB2994.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com>
2022-09-08  0:45                       ` Rick Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220815102707.7215495c@redslave.neermore.group \
    --to=nikita.shubin@maquefel.me \
    --cc=afd@ti.com \
    --cc=alpernebiyasak@gmail.com \
    --cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux@yadro.com \
    --cc=mr.nuke.me@gmail.com \
    --cc=n.shubin@yadro.com \
    --cc=rick@andestech.com \
    --cc=s.miroshnichenko@yadro.com \
    --cc=seanga2@gmail.com \
    --cc=sjg@chromium.org \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    --cc=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
    --cc=ycliang@andestech.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).