* Option to fwmark incoming packets?
@ 2018-12-06 17:41 Matthias Urlichs
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Matthias Urlichs @ 2018-12-06 17:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: WireGuard mailing list
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 436 bytes --]
Hi,
I seem to require firewalling some peers' incoming traffic with special rules.
While it's certainly possible to add a bunch of iptables/nftables rules to
classify traffic from the WG interface (just mirror the peers' AllowedIP
entries …) this is redundant (thus possibly inconsistent) and bad for
performance.
How about a per-peer "fwmark" setting that marks that peer's incoming packets?
--
-- Matthias Urlichs
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 148 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
WireGuard mailing list
WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2018-12-06 17:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-12-06 17:41 Option to fwmark incoming packets? Matthias Urlichs
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).