* WireGuard within a WireGuard VPN
@ 2018-06-05 19:09 Lonnie Abelbeck
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Lonnie Abelbeck @ 2018-06-05 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: WireGuard mailing list
Hi,
I have successfully implemented a WAN failover using a Netgear LB1121 =
4G/LTE Modem over a WireGuard tunnel to a VM instance (static IPv4) in =
the cloud.
Since most 4G/LTE providers only support outbound-only (NAT'ed), =
IPv4-only, dynamic IPv4 address networks, by using WireGuard to a static =
IPv4 endpoint a bidirectional dual-stack IPv4/IPv6 network is created. =
Works very well.
Question ...
When failover occurs a 0.0.0.0/1 + 128.0.0.0/1 route is added to the wg0 =
interface via the cloud VM WireGuard address.
There is a secondary WireGuard peer (dynamic remote endpoint) other than =
the failover 4G/LTE peer, which on failover tries to re-establish over =
the WireGuard failover peer, which fails.
Possible solutions:
1) On failover add a route for the secondary endpoint (extracted using =
'wg') and route to the ethernet interface the 4G/LTE Modem is connected. =
Fingers crossed the dynamic remote endpoint does not change during the =
failover.
2) Possibly reduce the MTU of the secondary WireGuard peer to allow it =
to work within the WireGuard failover peer. If so, what MTU would be =
required for WG to tunnel within another WG ? Possibly would require =
separate wg0 and wg1 interfaces for matching MTU's ?
Appreciate any comments.
Lonnie
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2018-06-05 19:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-06-05 19:09 WireGuard within a WireGuard VPN Lonnie Abelbeck
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).