From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
To: WireGuard mailing list <wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com>
Cc: Willem van den Akker <wvdakker@wilsoft.nl>,
Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org>
Subject: wg-quick invoking resolvectl instead of resolvconf on systems where that is appropriate?
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 14:50:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zhjc3rzr.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1083 bytes --]
Hi Wireguard folks--
over in https://bugs.debian.org/939904, Michael Biebl (in cc) pointed
out that on GNU/Linux systems supervised by systemd, if systemd-resolved
is running, it might make more sense for wg-quick to invoke resolvectl
directly with the DNS parameter instead of depending on resolvectl's
resolvconf-like symlink shim.
Jason, is that something that you'd be ok with, or is wg-quick wedded to
resolvconf, even if resolvectl is available and there is no resolvconf?
(and if you're ok with it, but if both exist, do you have a preference
for which one should be used?)
Is anyone interested in hacking on src/tools/wg-quick/linux.bash to
enable this? I think the command should be pretty simple -- the main
things to get right are detection of subsystem availability and conflict
resolution.
I guess my preference would be something like:
* if resolvectl exists, try to use it. if it succeeds, done. (it
might fail if systemd-resolved is not running, for example)
* otherwise, try using resolvconf.
but of course this is Jason's call to make.
--dkg
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 148 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
WireGuard mailing list
WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
next reply other threads:[~2019-09-10 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-10 18:50 Daniel Kahn Gillmor [this message]
2019-09-10 18:52 ` wg-quick invoking resolvectl instead of resolvconf on systems where that is appropriate? Jason A. Donenfeld
2019-09-10 21:12 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2019-09-10 21:22 ` Michael Biebl
2019-09-11 18:40 ` Roy Marples
2019-10-31 23:19 Arjen Runsink
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zhjc3rzr.fsf@fifthhorseman.net \
--to=dkg@fifthhorseman.net \
--cc=biebl@debian.org \
--cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
--cc=wvdakker@wilsoft.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).