* Debian unstable Pin-Priority too high in Installation documentation
@ 2018-11-11 2:56 Laszlo KERTESZ
2018-11-12 3:55 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-11-12 10:07 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Laszlo KERTESZ @ 2018-11-11 2:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: WireGuard mailing list
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1489 bytes --]
Hi,
On the Wireguard site the Debian installation Pin-Priority is at 150 - this
is too high because the official Backports (Stretch-Backports currently)
has a default of 100. This makes certain packages such as kernel images to
be pointed to Unstable instead of Backports.
I believe a number such as 90 should be better choice.
For example for the package linux-image-amd64 we have:
# apt-cache policy linux-image-amd64
linux-image-amd64:
Installed: 4.18+98~bpo9+1
Candidate: 4.18+99
Version table:
4.18+99 150
150 http://deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages
*** 4.18+98~bpo9+1 100
100 http://ftp.debian.org/debian stretch-backports/main amd64
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
4.9+80+deb9u6 500
500 http://ftp.debian.org/debian stretch/main amd64 Packages
500 http://security.debian.org/debian-security stretch/updates/main
amd64 Packages
But if we lower the Pin Priority to 90:
# apt-cache policy linux-image-amd64
linux-image-amd64:
Installed: 4.18+98~bpo9+1
Candidate: 4.18+98~bpo9+1
Version table:
4.18+99 90
90 http://deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages
*** 4.18+98~bpo9+1 100
100 http://ftp.debian.org/debian stretch-backports/main amd64
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
4.9+80+deb9u6 500
500 http://ftp.debian.org/debian stretch/main amd64 Packages
500 http://security.debian.org/debian-security stretch/updates/main
amd64 Packages
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2269 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 148 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
WireGuard mailing list
WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Debian unstable Pin-Priority too high in Installation documentation
2018-11-11 2:56 Debian unstable Pin-Priority too high in Installation documentation Laszlo KERTESZ
@ 2018-11-12 3:55 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-11-12 8:16 ` Laszlo KERTESZ
2018-11-12 10:07 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jason A. Donenfeld @ 2018-11-12 3:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Laszlo KERTESZ, Daniel Kahn Gillmor; +Cc: WireGuard mailing list
Hi Laszlo,
Thanks for pointing this out. Presumably this is a suggestion for the
pin priority listed on the install page of the webpage? Or some place
else? I've CC'd dkg on this email to ack the change.
Jason
_______________________________________________
WireGuard mailing list
WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Debian unstable Pin-Priority too high in Installation documentation
2018-11-12 3:55 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
@ 2018-11-12 8:16 ` Laszlo KERTESZ
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Laszlo KERTESZ @ 2018-11-12 8:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason; +Cc: WireGuard mailing list
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 354 bytes --]
Hi,
Yes, it is for the webpage's install section.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 5:55 AM Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> wrote:
> Hi Laszlo,
>
> Thanks for pointing this out. Presumably this is a suggestion for the
> pin priority listed on the install page of the webpage? Or some place
> else? I've CC'd dkg on this email to ack the change.
>
> Jason
>
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 649 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 148 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
WireGuard mailing list
WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Debian unstable Pin-Priority too high in Installation documentation
2018-11-11 2:56 Debian unstable Pin-Priority too high in Installation documentation Laszlo KERTESZ
2018-11-12 3:55 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
@ 2018-11-12 10:07 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2018-11-13 1:21 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor @ 2018-11-12 10:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Laszlo KERTESZ, WireGuard mailing list
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 509 bytes --]
On Sun 2018-11-11 04:56:28 +0200, Laszlo KERTESZ wrote:
> On the Wireguard site the Debian installation Pin-Priority is at 150 - this
> is too high because the official Backports (Stretch-Backports currently)
> has a default of 100. This makes certain packages such as kernel images to
> be pointed to Unstable instead of Backports.
> I believe a number such as 90 should be better choice.
I agree with Laszlo that 90 would be a better choice for pinning
unstable.
thanks for the fix, Laszlo!
--dkg
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 148 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
WireGuard mailing list
WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Debian unstable Pin-Priority too high in Installation documentation
2018-11-12 10:07 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
@ 2018-11-13 1:21 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jason A. Donenfeld @ 2018-11-13 1:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor; +Cc: WireGuard mailing list
Cool, thanks guys. Website updated.
Jason
_______________________________________________
WireGuard mailing list
WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-11-13 1:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-11-11 2:56 Debian unstable Pin-Priority too high in Installation documentation Laszlo KERTESZ
2018-11-12 3:55 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-11-12 8:16 ` Laszlo KERTESZ
2018-11-12 10:07 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2018-11-13 1:21 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).