From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: workflows@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Patch attestation RFC + proof of concept
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 16:11:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200226201140.GA24263@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200226172502.q3fl67ealxsonfgp@chatter.i7.local>
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 12:25:02PM -0500, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> ### Three hashes per patch
>
> If you look at the contents of the patch attestation message
> (https://lore.kernel.org/signatures/202002251425.E7847687B@keescook/),
> you will notice a yaml-style formatted document with a series of three
> hashes. Let's take the first one as example:
>
> 2a02abe0-215cf3f1-2acb5798:
> i: 2a02abe02216f626105622aee2f26ab10c155b6442e23441d90fc5fe4071b86e
> m: 215cf3f133478917ad147a6eda1010a9c4bba1846e7dd35295e9a0081559e9b0
> p: 2acb5798c366f97501f8feacb873327bac161951ce83e90f04bbcde32e993865
>
> The source of these hashes is the following patch:
> https://lore.kernel.org/kernel-hardening/20200225051307.6401-2-keescook@chromium.org/
If you define an alternative message signature algorithm like this,
then is there still value in detatching the PGP signature from the
patch email?
The usual PGP signature computes a hash of the message in a certain
way (with unquoting etc). If you instead replace that with your method
and then just generate the normal base64 blob using:
msg_hash = HASH(HASH(i) || HASH(m) || HASH(p))
sig = RSA_Sign(msg_hash)
Then the base64 of the sig can just be dropped at the end of the
message, and doesn't need to be detached, or need the various ---BEGIN
PGP--- overheads
The magic I see here is defining a way to compute the message hash of
a patch email that doesn't cause a big mess.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-26 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-26 17:25 Patch attestation RFC + proof of concept Konstantin Ryabitsev
2020-02-26 17:50 ` Kees Cook
2020-02-26 18:47 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2020-02-26 20:11 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2020-02-26 20:42 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2020-02-26 21:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-02-26 21:18 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2020-02-27 1:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-02-27 4:11 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2020-02-27 10:05 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-02-27 13:30 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2020-02-27 14:29 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2020-02-28 1:57 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2020-02-28 2:30 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2020-02-28 18:33 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2020-02-28 17:54 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2020-03-06 16:53 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200226201140.GA24263@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).