* XDP/eBPF/jit problem, system crash, with some ctx access changes
@ 2020-09-28 15:19 Eelco Chaudron
2020-09-28 19:41 ` Eelco Chaudron
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Eelco Chaudron @ 2020-09-28 15:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: andriin, Alexei Starovoitov, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Cc: Xdp, bpf, Jiri, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Hi all,
I'm working on a PoC for some XDP multi-buffer access, but I'm running
into some jit/eBPF problem.
Here is a piece of code I added in bpf_convert_ctx_access(), on
net-next:
@@ -8496,9 +8531,17 @@ static u32 xdp_convert_ctx_access(enum b
switch (si->off) {
case offsetof(struct xdp_md, data):
- *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_FIELD_SIZEOF(struct xdp_buff, data),
+ *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_FIELD_SIZEOF(struct xdp_buff,
+ mb_data),
+ si->dst_reg, si->src_reg,
+ offsetof(struct xdp_buff, mb_data));
+ /* if (dst_reg != NULL) goto A */
+ *insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, si->dst_reg, 0, 1);
+ *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_FIELD_SIZEOF(struct xdp_buff,
+ data),
si->dst_reg, si->src_reg,
offsetof(struct xdp_buff, data));
+ /* A: */
break;
However, when executing the xdp_noinline self-test I get a segfault (and
yes, I'm 100% sure mb_data is always NULL):
$ sudo ./test_progs --name xdp_noinline
Killed
[ 19.333353] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address:
0000000000000000
[ 19.333376] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[ 19.333383] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
[ 19.333391] PGD 7b756067 P4D 7b756067 PUD 7850b067 PMD 0
[ 19.333401] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
[ 19.333408] CPU: 1 PID: 1579 Comm: test_progs Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6+
#70
[ 19.333416] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996),
BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
[ 19.333428] RIP: 0010:bpf_prog_2a72cd80d0b49e12_F+0x59a/0x6d8
[ 19.333436] Code: ff ff 48 8b 78 08 48 83 c7 01 48 89 78 08 48 8b 78
00 4c 01 ef 48 89 78 00 48 8b 7d 90 48 8b 77 08 48 8b 7f 38 48 85 ff 75
04 <48> 8b 7f 00 48 89 fa 48 83 c2 04 48 39 f2 0f 87 28 fb ff ff 8b 73
[ 19.333457] RSP: 0018:ffffb7330099fc70 EFLAGS: 00010246
[ 19.333465] RAX: ffffd732ffc8adf0 RBX: ffff9575b73d6958 RCX:
0000000000000020
[ 19.333474] RDX: ffff9575b6c4d000 RSI: ffff9575b6c4d136 RDI:
0000000000000000
[ 19.333483] RBP: ffffb7330099fd08 R08: ffff9575b6c4d0ec R09:
0000000000000000
[ 19.333491] R10: 40bf273800000000 R11: 0000000000000003 R12:
0000000000000000
[ 19.333500] R13: 000000000000007b R14: 4343917700000001 R15:
ffffb7330098dff8
[ 19.333510] FS: 00007f7274403740(0000) GS:ffff9575bdc80000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 19.333520] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 19.333527] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000076d22006 CR4:
0000000000370ee0
[ 19.333538] Call Trace:
[ 19.333547] bpf_prog_32ab9add9cf981b8_F+0x9e/0x7d8
[ 19.333562] bpf_test_run+0xc4/0x270
[ 19.333585] ? __bpf_arch_text_poke+0xaf/0x170
[ 19.333593] bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0x11a/0x250
[ 19.333607] __do_sys_bpf+0x8fe/0x1e60
[ 19.333628] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
[ 19.333647] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[ 19.333661] RIP: 0033:0x7f727450437d
[ 19.333667] Code: 00 c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa
48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f
05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d eb 6a 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[ 19.333688] RSP: 002b:00007ffd8b7a8888 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX:
0000000000000141
[ 19.333698] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX:
00007f727450437d
[ 19.333707] RDX: 0000000000000078 RSI: 00007ffd8b7a88e0 RDI:
000000000000000a
[ 19.333716] RBP: 00007ffd8b7a88a0 R08: 00007ffd8b7a89e8 R09:
00007ffd8b7a88e0
[ 19.333725] R10: 00007ffd8b7a8a40 R11: 0000000000000206 R12:
00007f72744036b8
[ 19.333734] R13: 00007ffd8b7a8980 R14: 00007ffd8b7a89c0 R15:
00007ffd8b7a89e0
[ 19.333743] Modules linked in: fuse nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4
nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib nft_reject_inet nf_reject_ipv4 nf_reject_ipv6
nft_reject nft_ct nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6
nf_defrag_ipv4 ip6_tables nft_compat ip_set rfkill nf_tables nfnetlink
intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common cirrus kvm_intel kvm drm_kms_helper
joydev virtio_net irqbypass net_failover failover virtio_balloon
i2c_piix4 drm ip_tables xfs libcrc32c crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul
crc32c_intel ghash_clmulni_intel serio_raw ata_generic qemu_fw_cfg
pata_acpi
[ 19.333811] CR2: 0000000000000000
Quickly looking at the xlated and jit code the transformation looks
fine.
As an experiment, I just tried to load the register twice, and this has
the same kind of weird effect on the xdp_noinline selftest:
@@ -8496,9 +8531,21 @@ static u32 xdp_convert_ctx_access(enum b
switch (si->off) {
case offsetof(struct xdp_md, data):- *insn++ =
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_FIELD_SIZEOF(struct xdp_buff, data),
si->dst_reg, si->src_reg,
offsetof(struct xdp_buff, data));
+ *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_FIELD_SIZEOF(struct xdp_buff,
+ data),
+ si->dst_reg, si->src_reg,
+ offsetof(struct xdp_buff, data));
break;
segfault:
[ 3038.299210] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical
address 0x298691604040000: 0000 [#5] SMP NOPTI
[ 3038.301016] CPU: 0 PID: 8629 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G D
5.9.0-rc6+ #71
[ 3038.301795] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996),
BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
[ 3038.302334] RIP: 0010:bpf_prog_162f3a446f46ea21_F+0x5bf/0xbe4
[ 3038.302876] Code: 08 48 8b 7f 00 48 8b 7f 00 48 89 fa 48 83 c2 04 48
39 f2 0f 87 2b fb ff ff 8b 73 00 49 c7 c2 59 8f 60 ad 49 c1 e2 20 4c 09
d6 <89> 77 00 e9 12 fb ff ff cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc
[ 3038.303951] RSP: 0018:ffff98bfc0ab3c70 EFLAGS: 00010282
[ 3038.304496] RAX: ffffb8bfbfc14460 RBX: ffff8cf8f8c1b158 RCX:
0000000000000020
[ 3038.305015] RDX: 0298691604040004 RSI: ad608f5900001234 RDI:
0298691604040000
[ 3038.305542] RBP: ffff98bfc0ab3d08 R08: ffff8cf8b4de90ec R09:
0000000000000000
[ 3038.306037] R10: ad608f5900000000 R11: 0000000000000003 R12:
ffff8cf8b5168000
[ 3038.306526] R13: 000000000000007b R14: d88f9de400000001 R15:
ffff98bfc0ac3758
[ 3038.307018] FS: 00007fa431a63740(0000) GS:ffff8cf8fdc00000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 3038.307527] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 3038.308012] CR2: 000055f843d74790 CR3: 0000000078a6c003 CR4:
0000000000370ef0
[ 3038.308512] Call Trace:
[ 3038.308986] bpf_prog_fe85f1fb8b720358_F+0x99/0x7f0
[ 3038.309460] bpf_test_run.cold+0x35/0x9d
[ 3038.309939] ? __bpf_arch_text_poke+0xaf/0x170
[ 3038.310420] bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0x11a/0x250
[ 3038.310878] __do_sys_bpf+0x8fe/0x1e60
[ 3038.311323] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
[ 3038.311758] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[ 3038.312189] RIP: 0033:0x7fa431b6437d
[ 3038.312622] Code: 00 c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa
48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f
05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d eb 6a 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[ 3038.313471] RSP: 002b:00007ffc8b6cea28 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX:
0000000000000141
[ 3038.313907] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX:
00007fa431b6437d
[ 3038.314361] RDX: 0000000000000078 RSI: 00007ffc8b6cea80 RDI:
000000000000000a
[ 3038.314775] RBP: 00007ffc8b6cea40 R08: 00007ffc8b6ceb88 R09:
00007ffc8b6cea80
[ 3038.315182] R10: 00007ffc8b6cebe0 R11: 0000000000000206 R12:
00007fa431a636b8
[ 3038.315589] R13: 00007ffc8b6ceb20 R14: 00007ffc8b6ceb60 R15:
0000000000000000
[ 3038.315970] Modules linked in: fuse nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4
nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib nft_reject_inet nf_reject_ipv4 nf_reject_ipv6
nft_reject nft_ct nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6
nf_defrag_ipv4 ip6_tables nft_compat ip_set rfkill nf_tables nfnetlink
intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common kvm_intel kvm virtio_net net_failover
joydev irqbypass virtio_balloon cirrus failover drm_kms_helper i2c_piix4
drm ip_tables xfs libcrc32c crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul crc32c_intel
serio_raw ghash_clmulni_intel ata_generic qemu_fw_cfg pata_acpi
[ 3038.317936] ---[ end trace bcf61aee1cf2ba1f ]---
If I look at the translated code, it looks fine, I see a couple of
references that look like:
; void *data = (void *)(long)ctx->data;
3: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r4 +0)
4: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r4 +0)
When I look at the jited code I see the same:
; void *data = (void *)(long)ctx->data;
25: mov 0x0(%rcx),%rdi
29: mov 0x0(%rcx),%rdi
If I try to find the “bpf_prog_fe85f1fb8b720358” in the “bpftool
prog dump jited id 88” output I can not find it :( Any idea where I
should look for it?
Anyone any idea before I start digging into the world of jit?
Thanks,
Eelco
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: XDP/eBPF/jit problem, system crash, with some ctx access changes
2020-09-28 15:19 XDP/eBPF/jit problem, system crash, with some ctx access changes Eelco Chaudron
@ 2020-09-28 19:41 ` Eelco Chaudron
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Eelco Chaudron @ 2020-09-28 19:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: andriin, Alexei Starovoitov, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Cc: Xdp, bpf, Jiri, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Björn Töpel,
Eelco Chaudron
Hi all once more…
I got an offline email from Bjorn decoding the first backtrace which
made it all clear (I was looking at the second one :).
Here is a fragment of the xlated code:
; data = (void *)(long)xdp->data;
604: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +56)
605: (55) if r1 != 0x0 goto pc+1
606: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0)
Now the jited code:
; data = (void *)(long)xdp->data;
595: mov 0x38(%rdi),%rdi
599: test %rdi,%rdi
59c: jne 0x00000000000005a2
59e: mov 0x0(%rdi),%rdi
It might not be obvious, but in this case, both the source and
destination registers are the same!!
Briefly looking at some other code in the filter.c code, I found some
instances where they check for this and copy the content to a temp
region in the ctx structure.
However, SOCK_ADDR_STORE_NESTED_FIELD_OFF might have the same problem as
my code!
I’ll rework my code to deal with the src=dst part. But more code might
exist that has the same problem…
Cheers,
Eelco
On 28 Sep 2020, at 17:19, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm working on a PoC for some XDP multi-buffer access, but I'm running
> into some jit/eBPF problem.
>
> Here is a piece of code I added in bpf_convert_ctx_access(), on
> net-next:
>
> @@ -8496,9 +8531,17 @@ static u32 xdp_convert_ctx_access(enum b
>
> switch (si->off) {
> case offsetof(struct xdp_md, data):
> - *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_FIELD_SIZEOF(struct xdp_buff, data),
> + *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_FIELD_SIZEOF(struct xdp_buff,
> + mb_data),
> + si->dst_reg, si->src_reg,
> + offsetof(struct xdp_buff, mb_data));
> + /* if (dst_reg != NULL) goto A */
> + *insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, si->dst_reg, 0, 1);
> + *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_FIELD_SIZEOF(struct xdp_buff,
> + data),
> si->dst_reg, si->src_reg,
> offsetof(struct xdp_buff, data));
> + /* A: */
> break;
>
> However, when executing the xdp_noinline self-test I get a segfault
> (and yes, I'm 100% sure mb_data is always NULL):
>
> $ sudo ./test_progs --name xdp_noinline
> Killed
>
> [ 19.333353] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address:
> 0000000000000000
> [ 19.333376] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> [ 19.333383] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> [ 19.333391] PGD 7b756067 P4D 7b756067 PUD 7850b067 PMD 0
> [ 19.333401] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
> [ 19.333408] CPU: 1 PID: 1579 Comm: test_progs Not tainted
> 5.9.0-rc6+ #70
> [ 19.333416] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996),
> BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
> [ 19.333428] RIP: 0010:bpf_prog_2a72cd80d0b49e12_F+0x59a/0x6d8
> [ 19.333436] Code: ff ff 48 8b 78 08 48 83 c7 01 48 89 78 08 48 8b
> 78 00 4c 01 ef 48 89 78 00 48 8b 7d 90 48 8b 77 08 48 8b 7f 38 48 85
> ff 75 04 <48> 8b 7f 00 48 89 fa 48 83 c2 04 48 39 f2 0f 87 28 fb ff ff
> 8b 73
> [ 19.333457] RSP: 0018:ffffb7330099fc70 EFLAGS: 00010246
> [ 19.333465] RAX: ffffd732ffc8adf0 RBX: ffff9575b73d6958 RCX:
> 0000000000000020
> [ 19.333474] RDX: ffff9575b6c4d000 RSI: ffff9575b6c4d136 RDI:
> 0000000000000000
> [ 19.333483] RBP: ffffb7330099fd08 R08: ffff9575b6c4d0ec R09:
> 0000000000000000
> [ 19.333491] R10: 40bf273800000000 R11: 0000000000000003 R12:
> 0000000000000000
> [ 19.333500] R13: 000000000000007b R14: 4343917700000001 R15:
> ffffb7330098dff8
> [ 19.333510] FS: 00007f7274403740(0000) GS:ffff9575bdc80000(0000)
> knlGS:0000000000000000
> [ 19.333520] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [ 19.333527] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000076d22006 CR4:
> 0000000000370ee0
> [ 19.333538] Call Trace:
> [ 19.333547] bpf_prog_32ab9add9cf981b8_F+0x9e/0x7d8
> [ 19.333562] bpf_test_run+0xc4/0x270
> [ 19.333585] ? __bpf_arch_text_poke+0xaf/0x170
> [ 19.333593] bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0x11a/0x250
> [ 19.333607] __do_sys_bpf+0x8fe/0x1e60
> [ 19.333628] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
> [ 19.333647] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> [ 19.333661] RIP: 0033:0x7f727450437d
> [ 19.333667] Code: 00 c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e
> fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24
> 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d eb 6a 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89
> 01 48
> [ 19.333688] RSP: 002b:00007ffd8b7a8888 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX:
> 0000000000000141
> [ 19.333698] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX:
> 00007f727450437d
> [ 19.333707] RDX: 0000000000000078 RSI: 00007ffd8b7a88e0 RDI:
> 000000000000000a
> [ 19.333716] RBP: 00007ffd8b7a88a0 R08: 00007ffd8b7a89e8 R09:
> 00007ffd8b7a88e0
> [ 19.333725] R10: 00007ffd8b7a8a40 R11: 0000000000000206 R12:
> 00007f72744036b8
> [ 19.333734] R13: 00007ffd8b7a8980 R14: 00007ffd8b7a89c0 R15:
> 00007ffd8b7a89e0
> [ 19.333743] Modules linked in: fuse nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4
> nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib nft_reject_inet nf_reject_ipv4 nf_reject_ipv6
> nft_reject nft_ct nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6
> nf_defrag_ipv4 ip6_tables nft_compat ip_set rfkill nf_tables nfnetlink
> intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common cirrus kvm_intel kvm drm_kms_helper
> joydev virtio_net irqbypass net_failover failover virtio_balloon
> i2c_piix4 drm ip_tables xfs libcrc32c crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul
> crc32c_intel ghash_clmulni_intel serio_raw ata_generic qemu_fw_cfg
> pata_acpi
> [ 19.333811] CR2: 0000000000000000
>
> Quickly looking at the xlated and jit code the transformation looks
> fine.
>
>
> As an experiment, I just tried to load the register twice, and this
> has the same kind of weird effect on the xdp_noinline selftest:
>
> @@ -8496,9 +8531,21 @@ static u32 xdp_convert_ctx_access(enum b
>
> switch (si->off) {
> case offsetof(struct xdp_md, data):- *insn++ =
> BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_FIELD_SIZEOF(struct xdp_buff, data),
> si->dst_reg, si->src_reg,
> offsetof(struct xdp_buff, data));
> + *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_FIELD_SIZEOF(struct xdp_buff,
> + data),
> + si->dst_reg, si->src_reg,
> + offsetof(struct xdp_buff, data));
> break;
>
> segfault:
>
> [ 3038.299210] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical
> address 0x298691604040000: 0000 [#5] SMP NOPTI
> [ 3038.301016] CPU: 0 PID: 8629 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G D
> 5.9.0-rc6+ #71
> [ 3038.301795] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996),
> BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
> [ 3038.302334] RIP: 0010:bpf_prog_162f3a446f46ea21_F+0x5bf/0xbe4
> [ 3038.302876] Code: 08 48 8b 7f 00 48 8b 7f 00 48 89 fa 48 83 c2 04
> 48 39 f2 0f 87 2b fb ff ff 8b 73 00 49 c7 c2 59 8f 60 ad 49 c1 e2 20
> 4c 09 d6 <89> 77 00 e9 12 fb ff ff cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc
> cc cc
> [ 3038.303951] RSP: 0018:ffff98bfc0ab3c70 EFLAGS: 00010282
> [ 3038.304496] RAX: ffffb8bfbfc14460 RBX: ffff8cf8f8c1b158 RCX:
> 0000000000000020
> [ 3038.305015] RDX: 0298691604040004 RSI: ad608f5900001234 RDI:
> 0298691604040000
> [ 3038.305542] RBP: ffff98bfc0ab3d08 R08: ffff8cf8b4de90ec R09:
> 0000000000000000
> [ 3038.306037] R10: ad608f5900000000 R11: 0000000000000003 R12:
> ffff8cf8b5168000
> [ 3038.306526] R13: 000000000000007b R14: d88f9de400000001 R15:
> ffff98bfc0ac3758
> [ 3038.307018] FS: 00007fa431a63740(0000) GS:ffff8cf8fdc00000(0000)
> knlGS:0000000000000000
> [ 3038.307527] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [ 3038.308012] CR2: 000055f843d74790 CR3: 0000000078a6c003 CR4:
> 0000000000370ef0
> [ 3038.308512] Call Trace:
> [ 3038.308986] bpf_prog_fe85f1fb8b720358_F+0x99/0x7f0
> [ 3038.309460] bpf_test_run.cold+0x35/0x9d
> [ 3038.309939] ? __bpf_arch_text_poke+0xaf/0x170
> [ 3038.310420] bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0x11a/0x250
> [ 3038.310878] __do_sys_bpf+0x8fe/0x1e60
> [ 3038.311323] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
> [ 3038.311758] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> [ 3038.312189] RIP: 0033:0x7fa431b6437d
> [ 3038.312622] Code: 00 c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e
> fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24
> 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d eb 6a 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89
> 01 48
> [ 3038.313471] RSP: 002b:00007ffc8b6cea28 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX:
> 0000000000000141
> [ 3038.313907] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX:
> 00007fa431b6437d
> [ 3038.314361] RDX: 0000000000000078 RSI: 00007ffc8b6cea80 RDI:
> 000000000000000a
> [ 3038.314775] RBP: 00007ffc8b6cea40 R08: 00007ffc8b6ceb88 R09:
> 00007ffc8b6cea80
> [ 3038.315182] R10: 00007ffc8b6cebe0 R11: 0000000000000206 R12:
> 00007fa431a636b8
> [ 3038.315589] R13: 00007ffc8b6ceb20 R14: 00007ffc8b6ceb60 R15:
> 0000000000000000
> [ 3038.315970] Modules linked in: fuse nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4
> nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib nft_reject_inet nf_reject_ipv4 nf_reject_ipv6
> nft_reject nft_ct nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6
> nf_defrag_ipv4 ip6_tables nft_compat ip_set rfkill nf_tables nfnetlink
> intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common kvm_intel kvm virtio_net net_failover
> joydev irqbypass virtio_balloon cirrus failover drm_kms_helper
> i2c_piix4 drm ip_tables xfs libcrc32c crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul
> crc32c_intel serio_raw ghash_clmulni_intel ata_generic qemu_fw_cfg
> pata_acpi
> [ 3038.317936] ---[ end trace bcf61aee1cf2ba1f ]---
>
>
> If I look at the translated code, it looks fine, I see a couple of
> references that look like:
>
> ; void *data = (void *)(long)ctx->data;
> 3: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r4 +0)
> 4: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r4 +0)
>
> When I look at the jited code I see the same:
>
> ; void *data = (void *)(long)ctx->data;
> 25: mov 0x0(%rcx),%rdi
> 29: mov 0x0(%rcx),%rdi
>
>
> If I try to find the “bpf_prog_fe85f1fb8b720358” in the “bpftool
> prog dump jited id 88” output I can not find it :( Any idea where I
> should look for it?
>
>
> Anyone any idea before I start digging into the world of jit?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Eelco
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-09-28 19:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-09-28 15:19 XDP/eBPF/jit problem, system crash, with some ctx access changes Eelco Chaudron
2020-09-28 19:41 ` Eelco Chaudron
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).