xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: AL13N <alien@rmail.be>
To: Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: pci passthrough issue introduced between 4.14.1 and 4.15.0
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 18:01:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0100caba62175123c63f0df4749a8c88@mail.rmail.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <552b4348-1c52-ce6b-9001-a144c7147a7c@suse.com>

Jan Beulich schreef op 2021-06-01 16:53:
> On 01.06.2021 16:44, AL13N wrote:
>> This mailing list is the correct place for the toolstack too? right?
> 
> Yes.

So, what's the plan to fix this? is the plan to fix the toolstack? or 
put your patch in kernel to kinda workaround it?

Is there a way to make a regression test or unit test or something?

Does anyone have an idea on what patch would cause the regression? that 
patch that I pointed out, could it be that one, or should i look at a 
specific file/line? I can't really just test all of the patches and/or 
combinations. I'm not really at home with the xen code; and my single 
xen server is production, so i can really only test in weekends...

AL13N


  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-03 16:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-01  7:36 pci passthrough issue introduced between 4.14.1 and 4.15.0 AL13N
2021-06-01 10:08 ` Jan Beulich
2021-06-01 14:06   ` AL13N
2021-06-01 14:28     ` AL13N
2021-06-01 14:33     ` Jan Beulich
2021-06-01 14:44       ` AL13N
2021-06-01 14:48         ` AL13N
2021-06-01 15:50           ` AL13N
2021-06-01 14:53         ` Jan Beulich
2021-06-03 16:01           ` AL13N [this message]
2021-06-04  6:56             ` Jan Beulich
2021-06-04  7:10               ` Juergen Gross
2021-06-04  8:37                 ` AL13N
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-06-01  7:34 AL13N
2021-06-01 10:03 ` George Dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0100caba62175123c63f0df4749a8c88@mail.rmail.be \
    --to=alien@rmail.be \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).