xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
To: osstest service owner <osstest-admin@xenproject.org>,
	xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
	Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
	Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [qemu-mainline test] 59908: regressions - FAIL
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 17:34:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1437842074.28924.13.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <osstest-59908-mainreport@xen.org>

On Sat, 2015-07-25 at 16:15 +0000, osstest service owner wrote:
> flight 59908 qemu-mainline real [real]
> http://secure-web.cisco.com/1u4kwl1o3Dc6FDtVhFHrYLmyppwmEL8O6TSGGkDPdNzjeTSjZl_GhmvpBKlKsBPNbIlSfLqlqdopz-VgXgkCmm0eXivzV7hDeVfWv9mkXQPnQ3spzegDYYVfh9iHBe-wMTmd3XUQxuatfoS10LGCgDxQSm8sKxRqO4rlyNLAnRT8/http%3A%2F%2Flogs.test-lab.xenproject.org%2Fosstest%2Flogs%2F59908%2F
> 
> Regressions :-(
> 
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
>  test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 12 guest-saverestore       fail REGR. vs. 59059
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 11 guest-saverestore  fail REGR. vs. 59059
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 11 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 59059
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 11 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 59059
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3-vcpus1 11 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 59059
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 11 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 59059
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 11 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 59059
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 11 guest-saverestore   fail REGR. vs. 59059
>  test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 12 guest-saverestore      fail REGR. vs. 59059
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 11 guest-saverestore    fail REGR. vs. 59059
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 11 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 59059
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 11 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 59059
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 11 guest-saverestore  fail REGR. vs. 59059

http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/bisect/qemu-mainline/test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64.guest-saverestore.html

was almost complete before the bisector decided to go off on test-amd64
-i386-freebsd10-i386.guest-saverestore instead for some reason.

All it missed was the final confirmation of the last pass, but from the
logs it was just about to blame:

commit df4b1024526cae3479da3492d6371fd4a7324a03
Author: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed Oct 8 10:58:10 2014 +0200

    migration: create new section to store global state
    
    This includes a new section that for now just stores the current qemu state.
    
    Right now, there are only one way to control what is the state of the
    target after migration.
    
    - If you run the target qemu with -S, it would start stopped.
    - If you run the target qemu without -S, it would run just after migration finishes.
    
    The problem here is what happens if we start the target without -S and
    there happens one error during migration that puts current state as
    -EIO.  Migration would ends (notice that the error happend doing block
    IO, network IO, i.e. nothing related with migration), and when
    migration finish, we would just "continue" running on destination,
    probably hanging the guest/corruption data, whatever.
    
    Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
    Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>

Perhaps we need to prod some new thing during the migration now? (Or
fix this non-backwards compat change maybe)

Ian.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-25 16:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-25 16:15 [qemu-mainline test] 59908: regressions - FAIL osstest service owner
2015-07-25 16:34 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2015-07-28 10:14   ` Anthony PERARD
2015-07-29 10:02     ` Stefano Stabellini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1437842074.28924.13.camel@citrix.com \
    --to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=anthony.perard@citrix.com \
    --cc=osstest-admin@xenproject.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).