From: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
osstest service owner <osstest-admin@xenproject.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [qemu-mainline test] 59908: regressions - FAIL
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 11:14:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150728101438.GK1379@perard.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1437842074.28924.13.camel@citrix.com>
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 05:34:34PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-07-25 at 16:15 +0000, osstest service owner wrote:
> > flight 59908 qemu-mainline real [real]
> > http://secure-web.cisco.com/1u4kwl1o3Dc6FDtVhFHrYLmyppwmEL8O6TSGGkDPdNzjeTSjZl_GhmvpBKlKsBPNbIlSfLqlqdopz-VgXgkCmm0eXivzV7hDeVfWv9mkXQPnQ3spzegDYYVfh9iHBe-wMTmd3XUQxuatfoS10LGCgDxQSm8sKxRqO4rlyNLAnRT8/http%3A%2F%2Flogs.test-lab.xenproject.org%2Fosstest%2Flogs%2F59908%2F
> >
> > Regressions :-(
> >
> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> > including tests which could not be run:
> > test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 12 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 59059
> > test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 11 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 59059
> > test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 11 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 59059
> > test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 11 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 59059
> > test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3-vcpus1 11 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 59059
> > test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 11 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 59059
> > test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 11 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 59059
> > test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 11 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 59059
> > test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 12 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 59059
> > test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 11 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 59059
> > test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 11 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 59059
> > test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 11 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 59059
> > test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 11 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 59059
>
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/bisect/qemu-mainline/test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64.guest-saverestore.html
>
> was almost complete before the bisector decided to go off on test-amd64
> -i386-freebsd10-i386.guest-saverestore instead for some reason.
>
> All it missed was the final confirmation of the last pass, but from the
> logs it was just about to blame:
>
> commit df4b1024526cae3479da3492d6371fd4a7324a03
> Author: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
> Date: Wed Oct 8 10:58:10 2014 +0200
>
> migration: create new section to store global state
>
> This includes a new section that for now just stores the current qemu state.
>
> Right now, there are only one way to control what is the state of the
> target after migration.
>
> - If you run the target qemu with -S, it would start stopped.
> - If you run the target qemu without -S, it would run just after migration finishes.
>
> The problem here is what happens if we start the target without -S and
> there happens one error during migration that puts current state as
> -EIO. Migration would ends (notice that the error happend doing block
> IO, network IO, i.e. nothing related with migration), and when
> migration finish, we would just "continue" running on destination,
> probably hanging the guest/corruption data, whatever.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
>
> Perhaps we need to prod some new thing during the migration now? (Or
> fix this non-backwards compat change maybe)
I've look at it, and I'm going to send fixes for this changes and another
changes that also breaks migration:
commit 61964c23e5ddd5a33f15699e45ce126f879e3e33
migration: Add configuration section
Thanks,
--
Anthony PERARD
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-28 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-25 16:15 [qemu-mainline test] 59908: regressions - FAIL osstest service owner
2015-07-25 16:34 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-28 10:14 ` Anthony PERARD [this message]
2015-07-29 10:02 ` Stefano Stabellini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150728101438.GK1379@perard.uk.xensource.com \
--to=anthony.perard@citrix.com \
--cc=Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=osstest-admin@xenproject.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).