xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH V6] vm_event: Allow subscribing to write events for specific MSR-s
@ 2016-04-27  7:48 Razvan Cojocaru
  2016-04-27 13:57 ` Wei Liu
  2016-04-29  2:44 ` Tian, Kevin
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Razvan Cojocaru @ 2016-04-27  7:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xen-devel
  Cc: kevin.tian, tamas, wei.liu2, jbeulich, Razvan Cojocaru,
	andrew.cooper3, ian.jackson, julien.grall, sstabellini,
	jun.nakajima

Previously, subscribing to MSR write events was an all-or-none
approach, with special cases for introspection MSR-s. This patch
allows the vm_event consumer to specify exactly what MSR-s it is
interested in, and as a side-effect gets rid of the
vmx_introspection_force_enabled_msrs[] special case.
The patch also introduces arch_monitor_init_domain() and
arch_monitor_cleanup_domain(), to do monitor-specific work
(as opposed to the previous way of doing all the setup in
vm_event_init_domain() / vm_event_cleanup_domain()).
This replaces the previously posted "xen: Filter out MSR write
events" patch.

Signed-off-by: Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@bitdefender.com>

---
Changes since V5:
 - Modified patch description to mention the new monitor functions.
 - Fixed duplicated xzalloc() / xfree() code.
 - Moved the monitor setup code (memset()s from vm_event_init_domain()
   to arch_monitor_init_domain().
 - Now returning 0 from arch_monitor_init_domain() for ARM.
 - No longer xzalloc()ating d->arch.monitor_msr_bitmap unless it's
   NULL.
---
 tools/libxc/include/xenctrl.h      |   9 ++-
 tools/libxc/xc_monitor.c           |   6 +-
 xen/arch/x86/hvm/event.c           |   3 +-
 xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c             |   3 +-
 xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.c        |  26 +-------
 xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c         |  10 +--
 xen/arch/x86/monitor.c             | 124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 xen/arch/x86/vm_event.c            |   3 +-
 xen/common/vm_event.c              |   5 ++
 xen/include/asm-arm/monitor.h      |  13 ++++
 xen/include/asm-x86/domain.h       |   4 +-
 xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/hvm.h      |   8 +--
 xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.h |   7 ---
 xen/include/asm-x86/monitor.h      |  12 ++++
 xen/include/public/domctl.h        |   5 +-
 15 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/libxc/include/xenctrl.h b/tools/libxc/include/xenctrl.h
index f5a034a..3216e48 100644
--- a/tools/libxc/include/xenctrl.h
+++ b/tools/libxc/include/xenctrl.h
@@ -2183,8 +2183,13 @@ int xc_monitor_get_capabilities(xc_interface *xch, domid_t domain_id,
 int xc_monitor_write_ctrlreg(xc_interface *xch, domid_t domain_id,
                              uint16_t index, bool enable, bool sync,
                              bool onchangeonly);
-int xc_monitor_mov_to_msr(xc_interface *xch, domid_t domain_id, bool enable,
-                          bool extended_capture);
+/*
+ * A list of MSR indices can usually be found in /usr/include/asm/msr-index.h.
+ * Please consult the Intel/AMD manuals for more information on
+ * non-architectural indices.
+ */
+int xc_monitor_mov_to_msr(xc_interface *xch, domid_t domain_id, uint32_t msr,
+                          bool enable);
 int xc_monitor_singlestep(xc_interface *xch, domid_t domain_id, bool enable);
 int xc_monitor_software_breakpoint(xc_interface *xch, domid_t domain_id,
                                    bool enable);
diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_monitor.c b/tools/libxc/xc_monitor.c
index b1705dd..78131b2 100644
--- a/tools/libxc/xc_monitor.c
+++ b/tools/libxc/xc_monitor.c
@@ -86,8 +86,8 @@ int xc_monitor_write_ctrlreg(xc_interface *xch, domid_t domain_id,
     return do_domctl(xch, &domctl);
 }
 
-int xc_monitor_mov_to_msr(xc_interface *xch, domid_t domain_id, bool enable,
-                          bool extended_capture)
+int xc_monitor_mov_to_msr(xc_interface *xch, domid_t domain_id, uint32_t msr,
+                          bool enable)
 {
     DECLARE_DOMCTL;
 
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ int xc_monitor_mov_to_msr(xc_interface *xch, domid_t domain_id, bool enable,
     domctl.u.monitor_op.op = enable ? XEN_DOMCTL_MONITOR_OP_ENABLE
                                     : XEN_DOMCTL_MONITOR_OP_DISABLE;
     domctl.u.monitor_op.event = XEN_DOMCTL_MONITOR_EVENT_MOV_TO_MSR;
-    domctl.u.monitor_op.u.mov_to_msr.extended_capture = extended_capture;
+    domctl.u.monitor_op.u.mov_to_msr.msr = msr;
 
     return do_domctl(xch, &domctl);
 }
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/event.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/event.c
index 56c5514..8fdb6f5 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/event.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/event.c
@@ -57,9 +57,8 @@ bool_t hvm_event_cr(unsigned int index, unsigned long value, unsigned long old)
 void hvm_event_msr(unsigned int msr, uint64_t value)
 {
     struct vcpu *curr = current;
-    struct arch_domain *ad = &curr->domain->arch;
 
-    if ( ad->monitor.mov_to_msr_enabled )
+    if ( monitored_msr(curr->domain, msr) )
     {
         vm_event_request_t req = {
             .reason = VM_EVENT_REASON_MOV_TO_MSR,
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
index e9d4c6b..7495820 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
@@ -3694,7 +3694,6 @@ int hvm_msr_write_intercept(unsigned int msr, uint64_t msr_content,
     bool_t mtrr;
     unsigned int edx, index;
     int ret = X86EMUL_OKAY;
-    struct arch_domain *currad = &current->domain->arch;
 
     HVMTRACE_3D(MSR_WRITE, msr,
                (uint32_t)msr_content, (uint32_t)(msr_content >> 32));
@@ -3702,7 +3701,7 @@ int hvm_msr_write_intercept(unsigned int msr, uint64_t msr_content,
     hvm_cpuid(1, NULL, NULL, NULL, &edx);
     mtrr = !!(edx & cpufeat_mask(X86_FEATURE_MTRR));
 
-    if ( may_defer && unlikely(currad->monitor.mov_to_msr_enabled) )
+    if ( may_defer && unlikely(monitored_msr(v->domain, msr)) )
     {
         ASSERT(v->arch.vm_event);
 
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.c
index 8284281..f8421e8 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.c
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
 #include <asm/hvm/vmx/vvmx.h>
 #include <asm/hvm/vmx/vmcs.h>
 #include <asm/flushtlb.h>
+#include <asm/monitor.h>
 #include <asm/shadow.h>
 #include <asm/tboot.h>
 #include <asm/apic.h>
@@ -108,18 +109,6 @@ u64 vmx_ept_vpid_cap __read_mostly;
 u64 vmx_vmfunc __read_mostly;
 bool_t vmx_virt_exception __read_mostly;
 
-const u32 vmx_introspection_force_enabled_msrs[] = {
-    MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_EIP,
-    MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_ESP,
-    MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_CS,
-    MSR_IA32_MC0_CTL,
-    MSR_STAR,
-    MSR_LSTAR
-};
-
-const unsigned int vmx_introspection_force_enabled_msrs_size =
-    ARRAY_SIZE(vmx_introspection_force_enabled_msrs);
-
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(paddr_t, vmxon_region);
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(paddr_t, current_vmcs);
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct list_head, active_vmcs_list);
@@ -810,17 +799,8 @@ void vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(struct vcpu *v, u32 msr, int type)
     if ( msr_bitmap == NULL )
         return;
 
-    if ( unlikely(d->arch.monitor.mov_to_msr_enabled &&
-                  d->arch.monitor.mov_to_msr_extended) &&
-         vm_event_check_ring(&d->vm_event->monitor) )
-    {
-        unsigned int i;
-
-        /* Filter out MSR-s needed for memory introspection */
-        for ( i = 0; i < vmx_introspection_force_enabled_msrs_size; i++ )
-            if ( msr == vmx_introspection_force_enabled_msrs[i] )
-                return;
-    }
+    if ( unlikely(monitored_msr(d, msr)) )
+        return;
 
     /*
      * See Intel PRM Vol. 3, 20.6.9 (MSR-Bitmap Address). Early manuals
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
index bc4410f..9135441 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -1958,16 +1958,12 @@ void vmx_hypervisor_cpuid_leaf(uint32_t sub_idx,
         *eax |= XEN_HVM_CPUID_X2APIC_VIRT;
 }
 
-static void vmx_enable_msr_exit_interception(struct domain *d)
+static void vmx_enable_msr_interception(struct domain *d, uint32_t msr)
 {
     struct vcpu *v;
-    unsigned int i;
 
-    /* Enable interception for MSRs needed for memory introspection. */
     for_each_vcpu ( d, v )
-        for ( i = 0; i < vmx_introspection_force_enabled_msrs_size; i++ )
-            vmx_enable_intercept_for_msr(v, vmx_introspection_force_enabled_msrs[i],
-                                         MSR_TYPE_W);
+        vmx_enable_intercept_for_msr(v, msr, MSR_TYPE_W);
 }
 
 static bool_t vmx_is_singlestep_supported(void)
@@ -2166,7 +2162,7 @@ static struct hvm_function_table __initdata vmx_function_table = {
     .handle_eoi           = vmx_handle_eoi,
     .nhvm_hap_walk_L1_p2m = nvmx_hap_walk_L1_p2m,
     .hypervisor_cpuid_leaf = vmx_hypervisor_cpuid_leaf,
-    .enable_msr_exit_interception = vmx_enable_msr_exit_interception,
+    .enable_msr_interception = vmx_enable_msr_interception,
     .is_singlestep_supported = vmx_is_singlestep_supported,
     .set_mode = vmx_set_mode,
     .altp2m_vcpu_update_p2m = vmx_vcpu_update_eptp,
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/monitor.c b/xen/arch/x86/monitor.c
index 1fec412..8271b31 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/monitor.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/monitor.c
@@ -22,6 +22,103 @@
 #include <asm/monitor.h>
 #include <public/vm_event.h>
 
+int arch_monitor_init_domain(struct domain *d)
+{
+    if ( !d->arch.monitor_msr_bitmap )
+        d->arch.monitor_msr_bitmap = xzalloc(struct monitor_msr_bitmap);
+
+    if ( !d->arch.monitor_msr_bitmap )
+        return -ENOMEM;
+
+    memset(&d->arch.monitor, 0, sizeof(d->arch.monitor));
+    memset(&d->monitor, 0, sizeof(d->monitor));
+
+    return 0;
+}
+
+void arch_monitor_cleanup_domain(struct domain *d)
+{
+    xfree(d->arch.monitor_msr_bitmap);
+    d->arch.monitor_msr_bitmap = NULL;
+}
+
+static void *monitor_bitmap_for_msr(struct domain *d, u32 *msr)
+{
+    ASSERT(d->arch.monitor_msr_bitmap && msr);
+
+    switch ( *msr )
+    {
+    case 0 ... 0x1fff:
+        BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(d->arch.monitor_msr_bitmap->low) * 8 < 0x1fff);
+        return &d->arch.monitor_msr_bitmap->low;
+
+    case 0x40000000 ... 0x40001fff:
+        BUILD_BUG_ON(
+            ARRAY_SIZE(d->arch.monitor_msr_bitmap->hypervisor) * 8 < 0x1fff);
+        *msr &= 0x1fff;
+        return &d->arch.monitor_msr_bitmap->hypervisor;
+
+    case 0xc0000000 ... 0xc0001fff:
+        BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(d->arch.monitor_msr_bitmap->high) * 8 < 0x1fff);
+        *msr &= 0x1fff;
+        return &d->arch.monitor_msr_bitmap->high;
+
+    default:
+        return NULL;
+    }
+}
+
+static int monitor_enable_msr(struct domain *d, u32 msr)
+{
+    u32 *bitmap;
+
+    if ( !d->arch.monitor_msr_bitmap )
+        return -ENXIO;
+
+    bitmap = monitor_bitmap_for_msr(d, &msr);
+
+    if ( !bitmap )
+        return -EINVAL;
+
+    __set_bit(msr, bitmap);
+
+    hvm_enable_msr_interception(d, msr);
+
+    return 0;
+}
+
+static int monitor_disable_msr(struct domain *d, u32 msr)
+{
+    u32 *bitmap;
+
+    if ( !d->arch.monitor_msr_bitmap )
+        return -ENXIO;
+
+    bitmap = monitor_bitmap_for_msr(d, &msr);
+
+    if ( !bitmap )
+        return -EINVAL;
+
+    __clear_bit(msr, bitmap);
+
+    return 0;
+}
+
+bool_t monitored_msr(struct domain *d, u32 msr)
+{
+    u32 *bitmap;
+
+    if ( !d->arch.monitor_msr_bitmap )
+        return 0;
+
+    bitmap = monitor_bitmap_for_msr(d, &msr);
+
+    if ( !bitmap )
+        return 0;
+
+    return test_bit(msr, bitmap);
+}
+
 int arch_monitor_domctl_event(struct domain *d,
                               struct xen_domctl_monitor_op *mop)
 {
@@ -77,25 +174,28 @@ int arch_monitor_domctl_event(struct domain *d,
 
     case XEN_DOMCTL_MONITOR_EVENT_MOV_TO_MSR:
     {
-        bool_t old_status = ad->monitor.mov_to_msr_enabled;
+        bool_t old_status;
+        int rc;
+        u32 msr = mop->u.mov_to_msr.msr;
 
-        if ( unlikely(old_status == requested_status) )
-            return -EEXIST;
+        domain_pause(d);
 
-        if ( requested_status && mop->u.mov_to_msr.extended_capture &&
-             !hvm_enable_msr_exit_interception(d) )
-            return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+        old_status = monitored_msr(d, msr);
 
-        domain_pause(d);
+        if ( unlikely(old_status == requested_status) )
+        {
+            domain_unpause(d);
+            return -EEXIST;
+        }
 
-        if ( requested_status && mop->u.mov_to_msr.extended_capture )
-            ad->monitor.mov_to_msr_extended = 1;
+        if ( requested_status )
+            rc = monitor_enable_msr(d, msr);
         else
-            ad->monitor.mov_to_msr_extended = 0;
+            rc = monitor_disable_msr(d, msr);
 
-        ad->monitor.mov_to_msr_enabled = requested_status;
         domain_unpause(d);
-        break;
+
+        return rc;
     }
 
     case XEN_DOMCTL_MONITOR_EVENT_SINGLESTEP:
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/vm_event.c b/xen/arch/x86/vm_event.c
index 5635603..a9d3861 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/vm_event.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/vm_event.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
 
 #include <xen/sched.h>
 #include <asm/hvm/hvm.h>
+#include <asm/monitor.h>
 #include <asm/vm_event.h>
 
 /* Implicitly serialized by the domctl lock. */
@@ -56,8 +57,6 @@ void vm_event_cleanup_domain(struct domain *d)
     }
 
     d->arch.mem_access_emulate_each_rep = 0;
-    memset(&d->arch.monitor, 0, sizeof(d->arch.monitor));
-    memset(&d->monitor, 0, sizeof(d->monitor));
 }
 
 void vm_event_toggle_singlestep(struct domain *d, struct vcpu *v)
diff --git a/xen/common/vm_event.c b/xen/common/vm_event.c
index 2906407..1ba12cb 100644
--- a/xen/common/vm_event.c
+++ b/xen/common/vm_event.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
 #include <xen/mem_access.h>
 #include <asm/p2m.h>
 #include <asm/altp2m.h>
+#include <asm/monitor.h>
 #include <asm/vm_event.h>
 #include <xsm/xsm.h>
 
@@ -665,6 +666,9 @@ int vm_event_domctl(struct domain *d, xen_domctl_vm_event_op_t *vec,
         {
         case XEN_VM_EVENT_ENABLE:
             /* domain_pause() not required here, see XSA-99 */
+            rc = arch_monitor_init_domain(d);
+            if ( rc )
+                break;
             rc = vm_event_enable(d, vec, ved, _VPF_mem_access,
                                  HVM_PARAM_MONITOR_RING_PFN,
                                  monitor_notification);
@@ -675,6 +679,7 @@ int vm_event_domctl(struct domain *d, xen_domctl_vm_event_op_t *vec,
             {
                 domain_pause(d);
                 rc = vm_event_disable(d, ved);
+                arch_monitor_cleanup_domain(d);
                 domain_unpause(d);
             }
             break;
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/monitor.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/monitor.h
index 6e36e99..478f5e9 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-arm/monitor.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/monitor.h
@@ -46,4 +46,17 @@ int arch_monitor_domctl_event(struct domain *d,
     return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 }
 
+static inline
+int arch_monitor_init_domain(struct domain *d)
+{
+    /* No arch-specific domain initialization on ARM. */
+    return 0;
+}
+
+static inline
+void arch_monitor_cleanup_domain(struct domain *d)
+{
+    /* No arch-specific domain cleanup on ARM. */
+}
+
 #endif /* __ASM_ARM_MONITOR_H__ */
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/domain.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/domain.h
index 165e533..8a96242 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/domain.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/domain.h
@@ -401,12 +401,12 @@ struct arch_domain
         unsigned int write_ctrlreg_enabled       : 4;
         unsigned int write_ctrlreg_sync          : 4;
         unsigned int write_ctrlreg_onchangeonly  : 4;
-        unsigned int mov_to_msr_enabled          : 1;
-        unsigned int mov_to_msr_extended         : 1;
         unsigned int singlestep_enabled          : 1;
         unsigned int software_breakpoint_enabled : 1;
     } monitor;
 
+    struct monitor_msr_bitmap *monitor_msr_bitmap;
+
     /* Mem_access emulation control */
     bool_t mem_access_emulate_each_rep;
 
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/hvm.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/hvm.h
index 7b7ff3f..9d1c0ef 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/hvm.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/hvm.h
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ struct hvm_function_table {
                                   uint32_t *eax, uint32_t *ebx,
                                   uint32_t *ecx, uint32_t *edx);
 
-    void (*enable_msr_exit_interception)(struct domain *d);
+    void (*enable_msr_interception)(struct domain *d, uint32_t msr);
     bool_t (*is_singlestep_supported)(void);
     int (*set_mode)(struct vcpu *v, int mode);
 
@@ -565,11 +565,11 @@ static inline enum hvm_intblk nhvm_interrupt_blocked(struct vcpu *v)
     return hvm_funcs.nhvm_intr_blocked(v);
 }
 
-static inline bool_t hvm_enable_msr_exit_interception(struct domain *d)
+static inline bool_t hvm_enable_msr_interception(struct domain *d, uint32_t msr)
 {
-    if ( hvm_funcs.enable_msr_exit_interception )
+    if ( hvm_funcs.enable_msr_interception )
     {
-        hvm_funcs.enable_msr_exit_interception(d);
+        hvm_funcs.enable_msr_interception(d, msr);
         return 1;
     }
 
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.h
index b54f52f..7bf5326 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.h
@@ -562,13 +562,6 @@ enum vmcs_field {
     HOST_RIP                        = 0x00006c16,
 };
 
-/*
- * A set of MSR-s that need to be enabled for memory introspection
- * to work.
- */
-extern const u32 vmx_introspection_force_enabled_msrs[];
-extern const unsigned int vmx_introspection_force_enabled_msrs_size;
-
 #define VMCS_VPID_WIDTH 16
 
 #define MSR_TYPE_R 1
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/monitor.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/monitor.h
index 0954b59..046f592 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/monitor.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/monitor.h
@@ -29,6 +29,12 @@
 
 #define monitor_ctrlreg_bitmask(ctrlreg_index) (1U << (ctrlreg_index))
 
+struct monitor_msr_bitmap {
+    uint8_t low[1024];
+    uint8_t hypervisor[1024];
+    uint8_t high[1024];
+};
+
 static inline
 int arch_monitor_domctl_op(struct domain *d, struct xen_domctl_monitor_op *mop)
 {
@@ -50,4 +56,10 @@ int arch_monitor_domctl_op(struct domain *d, struct xen_domctl_monitor_op *mop)
 int arch_monitor_domctl_event(struct domain *d,
                               struct xen_domctl_monitor_op *mop);
 
+int arch_monitor_init_domain(struct domain *d);
+
+void arch_monitor_cleanup_domain(struct domain *d);
+
+bool_t monitored_msr(struct domain *d, u32 msr);
+
 #endif /* __ASM_X86_MONITOR_H__ */
diff --git a/xen/include/public/domctl.h b/xen/include/public/domctl.h
index 2457698..7be3924 100644
--- a/xen/include/public/domctl.h
+++ b/xen/include/public/domctl.h
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
 #include "hvm/save.h"
 #include "memory.h"
 
-#define XEN_DOMCTL_INTERFACE_VERSION 0x0000000b
+#define XEN_DOMCTL_INTERFACE_VERSION 0x0000000c
 
 /*
  * NB. xen_domctl.domain is an IN/OUT parameter for this operation.
@@ -1107,8 +1107,7 @@ struct xen_domctl_monitor_op {
         } mov_to_cr;
 
         struct {
-            /* Enable the capture of an extended set of MSRs */
-            uint8_t extended_capture;
+            uint32_t msr;
         } mov_to_msr;
 
         struct {
-- 
1.9.1


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V6] vm_event: Allow subscribing to write events for specific MSR-s
  2016-04-27  7:48 [PATCH V6] vm_event: Allow subscribing to write events for specific MSR-s Razvan Cojocaru
@ 2016-04-27 13:57 ` Wei Liu
  2016-04-29  2:44 ` Tian, Kevin
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wei Liu @ 2016-04-27 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Razvan Cojocaru
  Cc: kevin.tian, tamas, wei.liu2, jun.nakajima, andrew.cooper3,
	ian.jackson, xen-devel, julien.grall, sstabellini, jbeulich

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:48:04AM +0300, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
> Previously, subscribing to MSR write events was an all-or-none
> approach, with special cases for introspection MSR-s. This patch
> allows the vm_event consumer to specify exactly what MSR-s it is
> interested in, and as a side-effect gets rid of the
> vmx_introspection_force_enabled_msrs[] special case.
> The patch also introduces arch_monitor_init_domain() and
> arch_monitor_cleanup_domain(), to do monitor-specific work
> (as opposed to the previous way of doing all the setup in
> vm_event_init_domain() / vm_event_cleanup_domain()).
> This replaces the previously posted "xen: Filter out MSR write
> events" patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@bitdefender.com>
> 
> ---
> Changes since V5:
>  - Modified patch description to mention the new monitor functions.
>  - Fixed duplicated xzalloc() / xfree() code.
>  - Moved the monitor setup code (memset()s from vm_event_init_domain()
>    to arch_monitor_init_domain().
>  - Now returning 0 from arch_monitor_init_domain() for ARM.
>  - No longer xzalloc()ating d->arch.monitor_msr_bitmap unless it's
>    NULL.
> ---
>  tools/libxc/include/xenctrl.h      |   9 ++-
>  tools/libxc/xc_monitor.c           |   6 +-

The changes to libxc are just plumbing, so with appropriate acks from HV
side:

Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V6] vm_event: Allow subscribing to write events for specific MSR-s
  2016-04-27  7:48 [PATCH V6] vm_event: Allow subscribing to write events for specific MSR-s Razvan Cojocaru
  2016-04-27 13:57 ` Wei Liu
@ 2016-04-29  2:44 ` Tian, Kevin
  2016-04-29  5:31   ` Razvan Cojocaru
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tian, Kevin @ 2016-04-29  2:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Razvan Cojocaru, xen-devel
  Cc: tamas, wei.liu2, jbeulich, andrew.cooper3, ian.jackson,
	julien.grall, sstabellini, Nakajima, Jun

> From: Razvan Cojocaru [mailto:rcojocaru@bitdefender.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 3:48 PM
> +
> +static void *monitor_bitmap_for_msr(struct domain *d, u32 *msr)
> +{
> +    ASSERT(d->arch.monitor_msr_bitmap && msr);
> +
> +    switch ( *msr )
> +    {
> +    case 0 ... 0x1fff:
> +        BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(d->arch.monitor_msr_bitmap->low) * 8 <
> 0x1fff);
> +        return &d->arch.monitor_msr_bitmap->low;
> +
> +    case 0x40000000 ... 0x40001fff:
> +        BUILD_BUG_ON(
> +            ARRAY_SIZE(d->arch.monitor_msr_bitmap->hypervisor) * 8 < 0x1fff);
> +        *msr &= 0x1fff;
> +        return &d->arch.monitor_msr_bitmap->hypervisor;

I think we shouldn't change '*msr' directly here. Since later, 

> +
> +    case 0xc0000000 ... 0xc0001fff:
> +        BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(d->arch.monitor_msr_bitmap->high) * 8 <
> 0x1fff);
> +        *msr &= 0x1fff;
> +        return &d->arch.monitor_msr_bitmap->high;
> +
> +    default:
> +        return NULL;
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +static int monitor_enable_msr(struct domain *d, u32 msr)
> +{
> +    u32 *bitmap;
> +
> +    if ( !d->arch.monitor_msr_bitmap )
> +        return -ENXIO;
> +
> +    bitmap = monitor_bitmap_for_msr(d, &msr);
> +
> +    if ( !bitmap )
> +        return -EINVAL;
> +
> +    __set_bit(msr, bitmap);
> +
> +    hvm_enable_msr_interception(d, msr);

Here the original msr value is expected.

Thanks
Kevin

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V6] vm_event: Allow subscribing to write events for specific MSR-s
  2016-04-29  2:44 ` Tian, Kevin
@ 2016-04-29  5:31   ` Razvan Cojocaru
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Razvan Cojocaru @ 2016-04-29  5:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tian, Kevin, xen-devel
  Cc: tamas, wei.liu2, jbeulich, andrew.cooper3, ian.jackson,
	julien.grall, sstabellini, Nakajima, Jun

On 04/29/16 05:44, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Razvan Cojocaru [mailto:rcojocaru@bitdefender.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 3:48 PM
>> +
>> +static void *monitor_bitmap_for_msr(struct domain *d, u32 *msr)
>> +{
>> +    ASSERT(d->arch.monitor_msr_bitmap && msr);
>> +
>> +    switch ( *msr )
>> +    {
>> +    case 0 ... 0x1fff:
>> +        BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(d->arch.monitor_msr_bitmap->low) * 8 <
>> 0x1fff);
>> +        return &d->arch.monitor_msr_bitmap->low;
>> +
>> +    case 0x40000000 ... 0x40001fff:
>> +        BUILD_BUG_ON(
>> +            ARRAY_SIZE(d->arch.monitor_msr_bitmap->hypervisor) * 8 < 0x1fff);
>> +        *msr &= 0x1fff;
>> +        return &d->arch.monitor_msr_bitmap->hypervisor;
> 
> I think we shouldn't change '*msr' directly here. Since later, 
> 
>> +
>> +    case 0xc0000000 ... 0xc0001fff:
>> +        BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(d->arch.monitor_msr_bitmap->high) * 8 <
>> 0x1fff);
>> +        *msr &= 0x1fff;
>> +        return &d->arch.monitor_msr_bitmap->high;
>> +
>> +    default:
>> +        return NULL;
>> +    }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int monitor_enable_msr(struct domain *d, u32 msr)
>> +{
>> +    u32 *bitmap;
>> +
>> +    if ( !d->arch.monitor_msr_bitmap )
>> +        return -ENXIO;
>> +
>> +    bitmap = monitor_bitmap_for_msr(d, &msr);
>> +
>> +    if ( !bitmap )
>> +        return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +    __set_bit(msr, bitmap);
>> +
>> +    hvm_enable_msr_interception(d, msr);
> 
> Here the original msr value is expected.

Thanks for catching that. You're right. I didn't catch that while
testing because the only interesting MSR-s (for introspection) which
could also be disabled (and thus needed the explicit interception
enabling) were below 0x1fff, and so no problems occured (although of
course the patch was also enabling interception for a few other MSR-s
below 0x1fff which shouldn't have been intercepted).

I'll leave monitor_bitmap_for_msr() as it is, but will cache the old
value there and pass that to hvm_enable_msr_interception().


Thanks,
Razvan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-04-29  5:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-04-27  7:48 [PATCH V6] vm_event: Allow subscribing to write events for specific MSR-s Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-27 13:57 ` Wei Liu
2016-04-29  2:44 ` Tian, Kevin
2016-04-29  5:31   ` Razvan Cojocaru

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).