xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [Xen-devel]  PV DRM doesn't work without auto_translated_physmap feature in Dom0
@ 2020-02-04  8:28 Santucco
  2020-02-05  6:31 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Santucco @ 2020-02-04  8:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Oleksandr Andrushchenko, xen-devel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5635 bytes --]


Hello,
 
displ_be was compiled without zero-copy support early.
I have tried with the recompiled dom0 kernel, a result is the same.
 
Logs and configs (+displ_be’s CMakeCache.txt ) are attached.
 
 
Best regards,
Alexander
 
 
>Понедельник, 3 февраля 2020, 10:36 +03:00 от Oleksandr Andrushchenko < oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com >:
> 
>
>
>On 2/1/20 4:39 PM, Santucco wrote:
>> Hello again,
>> I have not yet made to work my drm client, so I have tried to run
>> linux like a domU (to see how it should work), it doesn’t work too
>> — displ_be catches SIGSEGV:
>>
>> #0  0x00007f4afed1c161 in ?? () from /lib64/libc.so.6
>> #1  0x000055723b9c5bec in Drm::DumbDrm::copy (this=0x7f4adc000e00) at
>> /home/santucco/tmp/xen-troops/displ_be/src/displayBackend/drm/Dumb.cpp:149
>> #2  0x000055723b9a8f51 in BuffersStorage::getFrameBufferAndCopy
>> (this=0x7f4ae00010e0, fbCookie=18446612682295083264) at
>> /home/santucco/tmp/xen-troops/displ_be/src/displayBackend/BuffersStorage.cpp:165
>> It tries to copy to mBuffer with non-accessible address.
>> For the moment I see a strange offset for mmap call of /dev/drm/card0
>> in the strace log — 0x100000000. Is that normal?
>> Any direction of which to dig will be very helpful.
>> Configuration details:
>> Xen 4.12.1 Dom0: Linux 4.20.17-gentoo #13 SMP Sat Dec 28 11:12:24 MSK
>> 2019 x86_64 Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N3050 @ 1.60GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
>> DomU: Linux 4.20.17-gentoo
>> last xen-troops/libxenbe and xen-troops/displ_be
>> Logs (dmesg, xl dmesg, displ_be, strace log of displ_be), a backtrace
>> of gdb and kernel configs are attached.
>> Thanks in advance.
>Could you please try Dom0 kernel WITHOUT the options below:
>CONFIG_XEN_GNTDEV_DMABUF=y
>CONFIG_XEN_GRANT_DMA_ALLOC=y
>
>Then, just to make sure, did you build displ_be without zero-copy support?
>
>> On 1/8/20 5:38 PM, Santucco wrote:
>> > Thank you very much for all your answers.
>> >
>> > Среда, 8 января 2020, 10:54 +03:00 от Oleksandr Andrushchenko
>> > < oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com
>> > < /compose?To=oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com >>:
>> > On 1/6/20 10:38 AM, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>> > > On 06.01.20 08:56, Santucco wrote:
>> > >> Hello,
>> > >>
>> > >> I’m trying to use vdispl interface from PV OS, it doesn’t work.
>> > >> Configuration details:
>> > >>      Xen 4.12.1
>> > >>      Dom0: Linux 4.20.17-gentoo #13 SMP Sat Dec 28 11:12:24 MSK
>> > 2019
>> > >> x86_64 Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N3050 @ 1.60GHz GenuineIntel
>> > GNU/Linux
>> > >>      DomU: x86 Plan9, PV
>> > >>      displ_be as a backend for vdispl and vkb
>> > >>
>> > >> when VM starts, displ_be reports about an error:
>> > >> gnttab: error: ioctl DMABUF_EXP_FROM_REFS failed: Invalid argument
>> > >> (displ_be.log:221)
>> > >>
>> > >> related Dom0 output is:
>> > >> [  191.579278] Cannot provide dma-buf: use_ptemode 1
>> > >> (dmesg.create.log:123)
>> > >
>> > > This seems to be a limitation of the xen dma-buf driver. It was
>> > written
>> > > for being used on ARM initially where PV is not available.
>> > This is true and we never tried/targeted PV domains with this
>> > implementation,
>> > so if there is a need for that someone has to take a look on the
>> > proper
>> > implementation for PV…
>> >
>> > Have I got your right and there is no the proper implementation :-)?
>> There is no
>> >
>> > >
>> > > CC-ing Oleksandr Andrushchenko who is the author of that driver. He
>> > > should be able to tell us what would be needed to enable PV dom0.
>> > >
>> > > Depending on your use case it might be possible to use PVH dom0, but
>> > > support for this mode is "experimental" only and some features
>> > are not
>> > > yet working.
>> > >
>> > Well, one of the workarounds possible is to drop zero-copying use-case
>> > (this is why display backend tries to create dmu-bufs from grants
>> > passed
>> > by the guest domain and fails because of "Cannot provide dma-buf:
>> > use_ptemode 1")
>> > So, in this case display backend will do memory copying for the
>> > incoming
>> > frames
>> > and won't touch DMABUF_EXP_FROM_REFS ioctl.
>> > To do so just disable zero-copying while building the backend [1]
>> >
>> > Thanks, I have just tried the workaround.  The backend has failed
>> > in an other place not corresponding with dma_buf.
>> > Anyway it is enough to continue debugging  my frontend implementation.
>> > Do you know how big is performance penalty in comparison with
>> > the zero-copy variant?
>> Well, it solely depends on your setup, so I cannot tell what
>> would the numbers be in your case. Comparing to what I have doesn't
>> make any sense to me: one should compare apples to apples
>> > Does it make a sense if I make a dedicated HVM domain with linux only
>> > for the purpose of vdispl and vkbd backends? Is there a hope this
>> > approach will work?
>> You can try if this approach fits your design and requirements
>> >
>> > >
>> > > Juergen
>> > >
>> > [1]
>> >
>>  https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt#L12
>> < https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt*L12__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!gi81oZZNvWaFWUVnaZluA_mNBAItLMd4RZmnc-M_FmlpDojqeQQnS7aXSNlbo80re9uOl2wqFA$ >
>> >
>> < https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt*L12__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!mz3gn1wQMX2DXeNuAV-1_dI7nxFYYZOgdPiJNSFMesCz9lAzOKlwVPlddbxbcLmUO44NOy0TFA$ >
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> >   Alexander Sychev
>>
 
   
----------------------------------------------------------------------

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 8809 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: logs.tgz --]
[-- Type: application/x-gzip, Size: 73345 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 157 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [Xen-devel] PV DRM doesn't work without auto_translated_physmap feature in Dom0
  2020-02-04  8:28 [Xen-devel] PV DRM doesn't work without auto_translated_physmap feature in Dom0 Santucco
@ 2020-02-05  6:31 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
  2020-02-05 18:59   ` Santucco
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko @ 2020-02-05  6:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Santucco, xen-devel

On 2/4/20 10:28 AM, Santucco wrote:
> Hello,
> displ_be was compiled without zero-copy support early.
> I have tried with the recompiled dom0 kernel, a result is the same.
> Logs and configs (+displ_be’s CMakeCache.txt ) are attached.
Ok, yet another test to localize the problem.
Could you please remove memcpy from
#1  0x000055e5a1f28bec in Drm::DumbDrm::copy (this=0x7f9338000e00) at 
/home/santucco/tmp/xen-troops/displ_be/src/displayBackend/drm/Dumb.cpp:149
and just memset the destination with 0 or whatever.

I expect that system won't crash, nothing will be shown (black screen), but
displ_be will show page flip events in its logs.
> Best regards,
> Alexander
>
>     Понедельник, 3 февраля 2020, 10:36 +03:00 от Oleksandr
>     Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>:
>
>
>     On 2/1/20 4:39 PM, Santucco wrote:
>     > Hello again,
>     > I have not yet made to work my drm client, so I have tried to run
>     > linux like a domU (to see how it should work), it doesn’t work too
>     > — displ_be catches SIGSEGV:
>     >
>     > #0  0x00007f4afed1c161 in ?? () from /lib64/libc.so.6
>     > #1  0x000055723b9c5bec in Drm::DumbDrm::copy
>     (this=0x7f4adc000e00) at
>     >
>     /home/santucco/tmp/xen-troops/displ_be/src/displayBackend/drm/Dumb.cpp:149
>     > #2  0x000055723b9a8f51 in BuffersStorage::getFrameBufferAndCopy
>     > (this=0x7f4ae00010e0, fbCookie=18446612682295083264) at
>     >
>     /home/santucco/tmp/xen-troops/displ_be/src/displayBackend/BuffersStorage.cpp:165
>     > It tries to copy to mBuffer with non-accessible address.
>     > For the moment I see a strange offset for mmap call of
>     /dev/drm/card0
>     > in the strace log — 0x100000000. Is that normal?
>     > Any direction of which to dig will be very helpful.
>     > Configuration details:
>     > Xen 4.12.1 Dom0: Linux 4.20.17-gentoo #13 SMP Sat Dec 28
>     11:12:24 MSK
>     > 2019 x86_64 Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N3050 @ 1.60GHz GenuineIntel
>     GNU/Linux
>     > DomU: Linux 4.20.17-gentoo
>     > last xen-troops/libxenbe and xen-troops/displ_be
>     > Logs (dmesg, xl dmesg, displ_be, strace log of displ_be), a
>     backtrace
>     > of gdb and kernel configs are attached.
>     > Thanks in advance.
>     Could you please try Dom0 kernel WITHOUT the options below:
>     CONFIG_XEN_GNTDEV_DMABUF=y
>     CONFIG_XEN_GRANT_DMA_ALLOC=y
>
>     Then, just to make sure, did you build displ_be without zero-copy
>     support?
>
>     > On 1/8/20 5:38 PM, Santucco wrote:
>     > > Thank you very much for all your answers.
>     > >
>     > > Среда, 8 января 2020, 10:54 +03:00 от Oleksandr Andrushchenko
>     > > <oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com
>     > > </compose?To=oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>>:
>     > > On 1/6/20 10:38 AM, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>     > > > On 06.01.20 08:56, Santucco wrote:
>     > > >> Hello,
>     > > >>
>     > > >> I’m trying to use vdispl interface from PV OS, it doesn’t work.
>     > > >> Configuration details:
>     > > >>      Xen 4.12.1
>     > > >>      Dom0: Linux 4.20.17-gentoo #13 SMP Sat Dec 28 11:12:24 MSK
>     > > 2019
>     > > >> x86_64 Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N3050 @ 1.60GHz GenuineIntel
>     > > GNU/Linux
>     > > >>      DomU: x86 Plan9, PV
>     > > >> displ_be as a backend for vdispl and vkb
>     > > >>
>     > > >> when VM starts, displ_be reports about an error:
>     > > >> gnttab: error: ioctl DMABUF_EXP_FROM_REFS failed: Invalid
>     argument
>     > > >> (displ_be.log:221)
>     > > >>
>     > > >> related Dom0 output is:
>     > > >> [ 191.579278] Cannot provide dma-buf: use_ptemode 1
>     > > >> (dmesg.create.log:123)
>     > > >
>     > > > This seems to be a limitation of the xen dma-buf driver. It was
>     > > written
>     > > > for being used on ARM initially where PV is not available.
>     > > This is true and we never tried/targeted PV domains with this
>     > > implementation,
>     > > so if there is a need for that someone has to take a look on the
>     > > proper
>     > > implementation for PV…
>     > >
>     > > Have I got your right and there is no the proper
>     implementation :-)?
>     > There is no
>     > >
>     > > >
>     > > > CC-ing Oleksandr Andrushchenko who is the author of that
>     driver. He
>     > > > should be able to tell us what would be needed to enable PV
>     dom0.
>     > > >
>     > > > Depending on your use case it might be possible to use PVH
>     dom0, but
>     > > > support for this mode is "experimental" only and some features
>     > > are not
>     > > > yet working.
>     > > >
>     > > Well, one of the workarounds possible is to drop zero-copying
>     use-case
>     > > (this is why display backend tries to create dmu-bufs from grants
>     > > passed
>     > > by the guest domain and fails because of "Cannot provide dma-buf:
>     > > use_ptemode 1")
>     > > So, in this case display backend will do memory copying for the
>     > > incoming
>     > > frames
>     > > and won't touch DMABUF_EXP_FROM_REFS ioctl.
>     > > To do so just disable zero-copying while building the backend [1]
>     > >
>     > > Thanks, I have just tried the workaround. The backend has failed
>     > > in an other place not corresponding with dma_buf.
>     > > Anyway it is enough to continue debugging  my
>     frontend implementation.
>     > > Do you know how big is performance penalty in comparison with
>     > > the zero-copy variant?
>     > Well, it solely depends on your setup, so I cannot tell what
>     > would the numbers be in your case. Comparing to what I have doesn't
>     > make any sense to me: one should compare apples to apples
>     > > Does it make a sense if I make a dedicated HVM domain with
>     linux only
>     > > for the purpose of vdispl and vkbd backends? Is there a hope this
>     > > approach will work?
>     > You can try if this approach fits your design and requirements
>     > >
>     > > >
>     > > > Juergen
>     > > >
>     > > [1]
>     > >
>     >
>     https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt#L12
>     <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt*L12__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!kvDgy3X0IuSQk7D2DdsGtsjtyGroYbNKOrPG95OpyoAkuBVbFSmzozwfor05jkRl0ita0FumBw$>
>     >
>     <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt*L12__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!gi81oZZNvWaFWUVnaZluA_mNBAItLMd4RZmnc-M_FmlpDojqeQQnS7aXSNlbo80re9uOl2wqFA$>
>     > >
>     >
>     <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt*L12__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!mz3gn1wQMX2DXeNuAV-1_dI7nxFYYZOgdPiJNSFMesCz9lAzOKlwVPlddbxbcLmUO44NOy0TFA$>
>     > >
>     > > Best regards,
>     > >   Alexander Sychev
>     >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [Xen-devel]  PV DRM doesn't work without auto_translated_physmap feature in Dom0
  2020-02-05  6:31 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
@ 2020-02-05 18:59   ` Santucco
  2020-02-06  8:20     ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Santucco @ 2020-02-05 18:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Oleksandr Andrushchenko; +Cc: xen-devel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6964 bytes --]


Hello,
 
Ok, I  commented out the memcpy call and run the test.
displ_be hasn’t crached, I have seen FLIP events in the log.
But there hasn’t been the black screen, just a blink effect every couple of seconds.
 
Logs are attached.
 
Best regards,
Alexander
 
  
>Среда, 5 февраля 2020, 9:31 +03:00 от Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>:
> 
>On 2/4/20 10:28 AM, Santucco wrote:
>> Hello,
>> displ_be was compiled without zero-copy support early.
>> I have tried with the recompiled dom0 kernel, a result is the same.
>> Logs and configs (+displ_be’s CMakeCache.txt ) are attached.
>Ok, yet another test to localize the problem.
>Could you please remove memcpy from
>#1  0x000055e5a1f28bec in Drm::DumbDrm::copy (this=0x7f9338000e00) at
>/home/santucco/tmp/xen-troops/displ_be/src/displayBackend/drm/Dumb.cpp:149
>and just memset the destination with 0 or whatever.
>
>I expect that system won't crash, nothing will be shown (black screen), but
>displ_be will show page flip events in its logs.
>> Best regards,
>> Alexander
>>
>> Понедельник, 3 февраля 2020, 10:36 +03:00 от Oleksandr
>> Andrushchenko < oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com >:
>>
>>
>> On 2/1/20 4:39 PM, Santucco wrote:
>> > Hello again,
>> > I have not yet made to work my drm client, so I have tried to run
>> > linux like a domU (to see how it should work), it doesn’t work too
>> > — displ_be catches SIGSEGV:
>> >
>> > #0  0x00007f4afed1c161 in ?? () from /lib64/libc.so.6
>> > #1  0x000055723b9c5bec in Drm::DumbDrm::copy
>> (this=0x7f4adc000e00) at
>> >
>> /home/santucco/tmp/xen-troops/displ_be/src/displayBackend/drm/Dumb.cpp:149
>> > #2  0x000055723b9a8f51 in BuffersStorage::getFrameBufferAndCopy
>> > (this=0x7f4ae00010e0, fbCookie=18446612682295083264) at
>> >
>> /home/santucco/tmp/xen-troops/displ_be/src/displayBackend/BuffersStorage.cpp:165
>> > It tries to copy to mBuffer with non-accessible address.
>> > For the moment I see a strange offset for mmap call of
>> /dev/drm/card0
>> > in the strace log — 0x100000000. Is that normal?
>> > Any direction of which to dig will be very helpful.
>> > Configuration details:
>> > Xen 4.12.1 Dom0: Linux 4.20.17-gentoo #13 SMP Sat Dec 28
>> 11:12:24 MSK
>> > 2019 x86_64 Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N3050 @ 1.60GHz GenuineIntel
>> GNU/Linux
>> > DomU: Linux 4.20.17-gentoo
>> > last xen-troops/libxenbe and xen-troops/displ_be
>> > Logs (dmesg, xl dmesg, displ_be, strace log of displ_be), a
>> backtrace
>> > of gdb and kernel configs are attached.
>> > Thanks in advance.
>> Could you please try Dom0 kernel WITHOUT the options below:
>> CONFIG_XEN_GNTDEV_DMABUF=y
>> CONFIG_XEN_GRANT_DMA_ALLOC=y
>>
>> Then, just to make sure, did you build displ_be without zero-copy
>> support?
>>
>> > On 1/8/20 5:38 PM, Santucco wrote:
>> > > Thank you very much for all your answers.
>> > >
>> > > Среда, 8 января 2020, 10:54 +03:00 от Oleksandr Andrushchenko
>> > > < oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com
>> > > </compose?To=oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>>:
>> > > On 1/6/20 10:38 AM, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>> > > > On 06.01.20 08:56, Santucco wrote:
>> > > >> Hello,
>> > > >>
>> > > >> I’m trying to use vdispl interface from PV OS, it doesn’t work.
>> > > >> Configuration details:
>> > > >>      Xen 4.12.1
>> > > >>      Dom0: Linux 4.20.17-gentoo #13 SMP Sat Dec 28 11:12:24 MSK
>> > > 2019
>> > > >> x86_64 Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N3050 @ 1.60GHz GenuineIntel
>> > > GNU/Linux
>> > > >>      DomU: x86 Plan9, PV
>> > > >> displ_be as a backend for vdispl and vkb
>> > > >>
>> > > >> when VM starts, displ_be reports about an error:
>> > > >> gnttab: error: ioctl DMABUF_EXP_FROM_REFS failed: Invalid
>> argument
>> > > >> (displ_be.log:221)
>> > > >>
>> > > >> related Dom0 output is:
>> > > >> [ 191.579278] Cannot provide dma-buf: use_ptemode 1
>> > > >> (dmesg.create.log:123)
>> > > >
>> > > > This seems to be a limitation of the xen dma-buf driver. It was
>> > > written
>> > > > for being used on ARM initially where PV is not available.
>> > > This is true and we never tried/targeted PV domains with this
>> > > implementation,
>> > > so if there is a need for that someone has to take a look on the
>> > > proper
>> > > implementation for PV…
>> > >
>> > > Have I got your right and there is no the proper
>> implementation :-)?
>> > There is no
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > CC-ing Oleksandr Andrushchenko who is the author of that
>> driver. He
>> > > > should be able to tell us what would be needed to enable PV
>> dom0.
>> > > >
>> > > > Depending on your use case it might be possible to use PVH
>> dom0, but
>> > > > support for this mode is "experimental" only and some features
>> > > are not
>> > > > yet working.
>> > > >
>> > > Well, one of the workarounds possible is to drop zero-copying
>> use-case
>> > > (this is why display backend tries to create dmu-bufs from grants
>> > > passed
>> > > by the guest domain and fails because of "Cannot provide dma-buf:
>> > > use_ptemode 1")
>> > > So, in this case display backend will do memory copying for the
>> > > incoming
>> > > frames
>> > > and won't touch DMABUF_EXP_FROM_REFS ioctl.
>> > > To do so just disable zero-copying while building the backend [1]
>> > >
>> > > Thanks, I have just tried the workaround. The backend has failed
>> > > in an other place not corresponding with dma_buf.
>> > > Anyway it is enough to continue debugging  my
>> frontend implementation.
>> > > Do you know how big is performance penalty in comparison with
>> > > the zero-copy variant?
>> > Well, it solely depends on your setup, so I cannot tell what
>> > would the numbers be in your case. Comparing to what I have doesn't
>> > make any sense to me: one should compare apples to apples
>> > > Does it make a sense if I make a dedicated HVM domain with
>> linux only
>> > > for the purpose of vdispl and vkbd backends? Is there a hope this
>> > > approach will work?
>> > You can try if this approach fits your design and requirements
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Juergen
>> > > >
>> > > [1]
>> > >
>> >
>>  https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt#L12
>> < https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt*L12__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!kvDgy3X0IuSQk7D2DdsGtsjtyGroYbNKOrPG95OpyoAkuBVbFSmzozwfor05jkRl0ita0FumBw$ >
>> >
>> < https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt*L12__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!gi81oZZNvWaFWUVnaZluA_mNBAItLMd4RZmnc-M_FmlpDojqeQQnS7aXSNlbo80re9uOl2wqFA$ >
>> > >
>> >
>> < https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt*L12__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!mz3gn1wQMX2DXeNuAV-1_dI7nxFYYZOgdPiJNSFMesCz9lAzOKlwVPlddbxbcLmUO44NOy0TFA$ >
>> > >
>> > > Best regards,
>> > >   Alexander Sychev
>> >
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 10002 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: logs.tgz --]
[-- Type: application/x-gzip, Size: 96796 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 157 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [Xen-devel] PV DRM doesn't work without auto_translated_physmap feature in Dom0
  2020-02-05 18:59   ` Santucco
@ 2020-02-06  8:20     ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
  2020-02-07 19:55       ` Santucco
  2020-04-19 11:26       ` Re[2]: " Santucco
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko @ 2020-02-06  8:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Santucco; +Cc: xen-devel

On 2/5/20 8:59 PM, Santucco wrote:
> Hello,
> Ok, I  commented out the memcpy call and run the test.
> displ_be hasn’t crached, I have seen FLIP events in the log.
> But there hasn’t been the black screen, just a blink effect every 
> couple of seconds.
> Logs are attached.
Ok, so I believe that frontend - backend (displ_be) communication is ok
and there is nothing to do there.

Next, I would start debugging the following in Xen:
(XEN) mm.c:2223:d2v0 Bad L1 flags 80
and have a look at [1]. Probably, someone on Xen x86 side can tell
if this could be related to the flags at [2].

> Best regards,
> Alexander
>
>     Среда, 5 февраля 2020, 9:31 +03:00 от Oleksandr Andrushchenko
>     <oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>:
>     On 2/4/20 10:28 AM, Santucco wrote:
>     > Hello,
>     > displ_be was compiled without zero-copy support early.
>     > I have tried with the recompiled dom0 kernel, a result is the same.
>     > Logs and configs (+displ_be’s CMakeCache.txt ) are attached.
>     Ok, yet another test to localize the problem.
>     Could you please remove memcpy from
>     #1  0x000055e5a1f28bec in Drm::DumbDrm::copy (this=0x7f9338000e00) at
>     /home/santucco/tmp/xen-troops/displ_be/src/displayBackend/drm/Dumb.cpp:149
>     and just memset the destination with 0 or whatever.
>
>     I expect that system won't crash, nothing will be shown (black
>     screen), but
>     displ_be will show page flip events in its logs.
>     > Best regards,
>     > Alexander
>     >
>     > Понедельник, 3 февраля 2020, 10:36 +03:00 от Oleksandr
>     > Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com
>     </compose?To=oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>>:
>     >
>     >
>     > On 2/1/20 4:39 PM, Santucco wrote:
>     > > Hello again,
>     > > I have not yet made to work my drm client, so I have tried to run
>     > > linux like a domU (to see how it should work), it doesn’t work too
>     > > — displ_be catches SIGSEGV:
>     > >
>     > > #0  0x00007f4afed1c161 in ?? () from /lib64/libc.so.6
>     > > #1  0x000055723b9c5bec in Drm::DumbDrm::copy
>     > (this=0x7f4adc000e00) at
>     > >
>     >
>     /home/santucco/tmp/xen-troops/displ_be/src/displayBackend/drm/Dumb.cpp:149
>     > > #2  0x000055723b9a8f51 in BuffersStorage::getFrameBufferAndCopy
>     > > (this=0x7f4ae00010e0, fbCookie=18446612682295083264) at
>     > >
>     >
>     /home/santucco/tmp/xen-troops/displ_be/src/displayBackend/BuffersStorage.cpp:165
>     > > It tries to copy to mBuffer with non-accessible address.
>     > > For the moment I see a strange offset for mmap call of
>     > /dev/drm/card0
>     > > in the strace log — 0x100000000. Is that normal?
>     > > Any direction of which to dig will be very helpful.
>     > > Configuration details:
>     > > Xen 4.12.1 Dom0: Linux 4.20.17-gentoo #13 SMP Sat Dec 28
>     > 11:12:24 MSK
>     > > 2019 x86_64 Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N3050 @ 1.60GHz GenuineIntel
>     > GNU/Linux
>     > > DomU: Linux 4.20.17-gentoo
>     > > last xen-troops/libxenbe and xen-troops/displ_be
>     > > Logs (dmesg, xl dmesg, displ_be, strace log of displ_be), a
>     > backtrace
>     > > of gdb and kernel configs are attached.
>     > > Thanks in advance.
>     > Could you please try Dom0 kernel WITHOUT the options below:
>     > CONFIG_XEN_GNTDEV_DMABUF=y
>     > CONFIG_XEN_GRANT_DMA_ALLOC=y
>     >
>     > Then, just to make sure, did you build displ_be without zero-copy
>     > support?
>     >
>     > > On 1/8/20 5:38 PM, Santucco wrote:
>     > > > Thank you very much for all your answers.
>     > > >
>     > > > Среда, 8 января 2020, 10:54 +03:00 от Oleksandr Andrushchenko
>     > > > <oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com
>     </compose?To=oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>
>     > > > </compose?To=oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>>:
>     > > > On 1/6/20 10:38 AM, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>     > > > > On 06.01.20 08:56, Santucco wrote:
>     > > > >> Hello,
>     > > > >>
>     > > > >> I’m trying to use vdispl interface from PV OS, it doesn’t
>     work.
>     > > > >> Configuration details:
>     > > > >>      Xen 4.12.1
>     > > > >>      Dom0: Linux 4.20.17-gentoo #13 SMP Sat Dec 28
>     11:12:24 MSK
>     > > > 2019
>     > > > >> x86_64 Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N3050 @ 1.60GHz GenuineIntel
>     > > > GNU/Linux
>     > > > >>      DomU: x86 Plan9, PV
>     > > > >> displ_be as a backend for vdispl and vkb
>     > > > >>
>     > > > >> when VM starts, displ_be reports about an error:
>     > > > >> gnttab: error: ioctl DMABUF_EXP_FROM_REFS failed: Invalid
>     > argument
>     > > > >> (displ_be.log:221)
>     > > > >>
>     > > > >> related Dom0 output is:
>     > > > >> [ 191.579278] Cannot provide dma-buf: use_ptemode 1
>     > > > >> (dmesg.create.log:123)
>     > > > >
>     > > > > This seems to be a limitation of the xen dma-buf driver.
>     It was
>     > > > written
>     > > > > for being used on ARM initially where PV is not available.
>     > > > This is true and we never tried/targeted PV domains with this
>     > > > implementation,
>     > > > so if there is a need for that someone has to take a look on the
>     > > > proper
>     > > > implementation for PV…
>     > > >
>     > > > Have I got your right and there is no the proper
>     > implementation :-)?
>     > > There is no
>     > > >
>     > > > >
>     > > > > CC-ing Oleksandr Andrushchenko who is the author of that
>     > driver. He
>     > > > > should be able to tell us what would be needed to enable PV
>     > dom0.
>     > > > >
>     > > > > Depending on your use case it might be possible to use PVH
>     > dom0, but
>     > > > > support for this mode is "experimental" only and some features
>     > > > are not
>     > > > > yet working.
>     > > > >
>     > > > Well, one of the workarounds possible is to drop zero-copying
>     > use-case
>     > > > (this is why display backend tries to create dmu-bufs from
>     grants
>     > > > passed
>     > > > by the guest domain and fails because of "Cannot provide
>     dma-buf:
>     > > > use_ptemode 1")
>     > > > So, in this case display backend will do memory copying for the
>     > > > incoming
>     > > > frames
>     > > > and won't touch DMABUF_EXP_FROM_REFS ioctl.
>     > > > To do so just disable zero-copying while building the
>     backend [1]
>     > > >
>     > > > Thanks, I have just tried the workaround. The backend has failed
>     > > > in an other place not corresponding with dma_buf.
>     > > > Anyway it is enough to continue debugging  my
>     > frontend implementation.
>     > > > Do you know how big is performance penalty in comparison with
>     > > > the zero-copy variant?
>     > > Well, it solely depends on your setup, so I cannot tell what
>     > > would the numbers be in your case. Comparing to what I have
>     doesn't
>     > > make any sense to me: one should compare apples to apples
>     > > > Does it make a sense if I make a dedicated HVM domain with
>     > linux only
>     > > > for the purpose of vdispl and vkbd backends? Is there a
>     hope this
>     > > > approach will work?
>     > > You can try if this approach fits your design and requirements
>     > > >
>     > > > >
>     > > > > Juergen
>     > > > >
>     > > > [1]
>     > > >
>     > >
>     >
>     https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt#L12
>     <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt*L12__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!kZ1JQFRS2pXj_IuXBhvYhmP9Q_svcLyjCXK9465ULGB4MeiYPRz2cF7lepHggr9UxPU9zOBEUw$>
>     >
>     <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt*L12__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!kvDgy3X0IuSQk7D2DdsGtsjtyGroYbNKOrPG95OpyoAkuBVbFSmzozwfor05jkRl0ita0FumBw$>
>     > >
>     >
>     <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt*L12__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!gi81oZZNvWaFWUVnaZluA_mNBAItLMd4RZmnc-M_FmlpDojqeQQnS7aXSNlbo80re9uOl2wqFA$>
>     > > >
>     > >
>     >
>     <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt*L12__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!mz3gn1wQMX2DXeNuAV-1_dI7nxFYYZOgdPiJNSFMesCz9lAzOKlwVPlddbxbcLmUO44NOy0TFA$>
>     > > >
>     > > > Best regards,
>     > > >   Alexander Sychev
>     > >
>     >
>     >
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
[1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.5/source/drivers/xen/gntdev.c#L300
[2] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.5/source/drivers/xen/gntdev.c#L319
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [Xen-devel]  PV DRM doesn't work without auto_translated_physmap feature in Dom0
  2020-02-06  8:20     ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
@ 2020-02-07 19:55       ` Santucco
  2020-04-19 11:26       ` Re[2]: " Santucco
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Santucco @ 2020-02-07 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Oleksandr Andrushchenko; +Cc: xen-devel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8423 bytes --]


Ok, thank you very much. 
One more question - is that normal the /dev/drm/card0 device is mapped at offset more then 4Gb?
 
Best regards,
Alexander 
>Четверг, 6 февраля 2020, 11:20 +03:00 от Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>:
> 
>On 2/5/20 8:59 PM, Santucco wrote:
>> Hello,
>> Ok, I  commented out the memcpy call and run the test.
>> displ_be hasn’t crached, I have seen FLIP events in the log.
>> But there hasn’t been the black screen, just a blink effect every
>> couple of seconds.
>> Logs are attached.
>Ok, so I believe that frontend - backend (displ_be) communication is ok
>and there is nothing to do there.
>
>Next, I would start debugging the following in Xen:
>(XEN) mm.c:2223:d2v0 Bad L1 flags 80
>and have a look at [1]. Probably, someone on Xen x86 side can tell
>if this could be related to the flags at [2].
>
>> Best regards,
>> Alexander
>>
>> Среда, 5 февраля 2020, 9:31 +03:00 от Oleksandr Andrushchenko
>> < oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com >:
>> On 2/4/20 10:28 AM, Santucco wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> > displ_be was compiled without zero-copy support early.
>> > I have tried with the recompiled dom0 kernel, a result is the same.
>> > Logs and configs (+displ_be’s CMakeCache.txt ) are attached.
>> Ok, yet another test to localize the problem.
>> Could you please remove memcpy from
>> #1  0x000055e5a1f28bec in Drm::DumbDrm::copy (this=0x7f9338000e00) at
>> /home/santucco/tmp/xen-troops/displ_be/src/displayBackend/drm/Dumb.cpp:149
>> and just memset the destination with 0 or whatever.
>>
>> I expect that system won't crash, nothing will be shown (black
>> screen), but
>> displ_be will show page flip events in its logs.
>> > Best regards,
>> > Alexander
>> >
>> > Понедельник, 3 февраля 2020, 10:36 +03:00 от Oleksandr
>> > Andrushchenko < oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com
>> </compose?To=oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>>:
>> >
>> >
>> > On 2/1/20 4:39 PM, Santucco wrote:
>> > > Hello again,
>> > > I have not yet made to work my drm client, so I have tried to run
>> > > linux like a domU (to see how it should work), it doesn’t work too
>> > > — displ_be catches SIGSEGV:
>> > >
>> > > #0  0x00007f4afed1c161 in ?? () from /lib64/libc.so.6
>> > > #1  0x000055723b9c5bec in Drm::DumbDrm::copy
>> > (this=0x7f4adc000e00) at
>> > >
>> >
>> /home/santucco/tmp/xen-troops/displ_be/src/displayBackend/drm/Dumb.cpp:149
>> > > #2  0x000055723b9a8f51 in BuffersStorage::getFrameBufferAndCopy
>> > > (this=0x7f4ae00010e0, fbCookie=18446612682295083264) at
>> > >
>> >
>> /home/santucco/tmp/xen-troops/displ_be/src/displayBackend/BuffersStorage.cpp:165
>> > > It tries to copy to mBuffer with non-accessible address.
>> > > For the moment I see a strange offset for mmap call of
>> > /dev/drm/card0
>> > > in the strace log — 0x100000000. Is that normal?
>> > > Any direction of which to dig will be very helpful.
>> > > Configuration details:
>> > > Xen 4.12.1 Dom0: Linux 4.20.17-gentoo #13 SMP Sat Dec 28
>> > 11:12:24 MSK
>> > > 2019 x86_64 Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N3050 @ 1.60GHz GenuineIntel
>> > GNU/Linux
>> > > DomU: Linux 4.20.17-gentoo
>> > > last xen-troops/libxenbe and xen-troops/displ_be
>> > > Logs (dmesg, xl dmesg, displ_be, strace log of displ_be), a
>> > backtrace
>> > > of gdb and kernel configs are attached.
>> > > Thanks in advance.
>> > Could you please try Dom0 kernel WITHOUT the options below:
>> > CONFIG_XEN_GNTDEV_DMABUF=y
>> > CONFIG_XEN_GRANT_DMA_ALLOC=y
>> >
>> > Then, just to make sure, did you build displ_be without zero-copy
>> > support?
>> >
>> > > On 1/8/20 5:38 PM, Santucco wrote:
>> > > > Thank you very much for all your answers.
>> > > >
>> > > > Среда, 8 января 2020, 10:54 +03:00 от Oleksandr Andrushchenko
>> > > > < oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com
>> </compose?To=oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>
>> > > > </compose?To=oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>>:
>> > > > On 1/6/20 10:38 AM, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>> > > > > On 06.01.20 08:56, Santucco wrote:
>> > > > >> Hello,
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> I’m trying to use vdispl interface from PV OS, it doesn’t
>> work.
>> > > > >> Configuration details:
>> > > > >>      Xen 4.12.1
>> > > > >>      Dom0: Linux 4.20.17-gentoo #13 SMP Sat Dec 28
>> 11:12:24 MSK
>> > > > 2019
>> > > > >> x86_64 Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N3050 @ 1.60GHz GenuineIntel
>> > > > GNU/Linux
>> > > > >>      DomU: x86 Plan9, PV
>> > > > >> displ_be as a backend for vdispl and vkb
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> when VM starts, displ_be reports about an error:
>> > > > >> gnttab: error: ioctl DMABUF_EXP_FROM_REFS failed: Invalid
>> > argument
>> > > > >> (displ_be.log:221)
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> related Dom0 output is:
>> > > > >> [ 191.579278] Cannot provide dma-buf: use_ptemode 1
>> > > > >> (dmesg.create.log:123)
>> > > > >
>> > > > > This seems to be a limitation of the xen dma-buf driver.
>> It was
>> > > > written
>> > > > > for being used on ARM initially where PV is not available.
>> > > > This is true and we never tried/targeted PV domains with this
>> > > > implementation,
>> > > > so if there is a need for that someone has to take a look on the
>> > > > proper
>> > > > implementation for PV…
>> > > >
>> > > > Have I got your right and there is no the proper
>> > implementation :-)?
>> > > There is no
>> > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > CC-ing Oleksandr Andrushchenko who is the author of that
>> > driver. He
>> > > > > should be able to tell us what would be needed to enable PV
>> > dom0.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Depending on your use case it might be possible to use PVH
>> > dom0, but
>> > > > > support for this mode is "experimental" only and some features
>> > > > are not
>> > > > > yet working.
>> > > > >
>> > > > Well, one of the workarounds possible is to drop zero-copying
>> > use-case
>> > > > (this is why display backend tries to create dmu-bufs from
>> grants
>> > > > passed
>> > > > by the guest domain and fails because of "Cannot provide
>> dma-buf:
>> > > > use_ptemode 1")
>> > > > So, in this case display backend will do memory copying for the
>> > > > incoming
>> > > > frames
>> > > > and won't touch DMABUF_EXP_FROM_REFS ioctl.
>> > > > To do so just disable zero-copying while building the
>> backend [1]
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks, I have just tried the workaround. The backend has failed
>> > > > in an other place not corresponding with dma_buf.
>> > > > Anyway it is enough to continue debugging  my
>> > frontend implementation.
>> > > > Do you know how big is performance penalty in comparison with
>> > > > the zero-copy variant?
>> > > Well, it solely depends on your setup, so I cannot tell what
>> > > would the numbers be in your case. Comparing to what I have
>> doesn't
>> > > make any sense to me: one should compare apples to apples
>> > > > Does it make a sense if I make a dedicated HVM domain with
>> > linux only
>> > > > for the purpose of vdispl and vkbd backends? Is there a
>> hope this
>> > > > approach will work?
>> > > You can try if this approach fits your design and requirements
>> > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Juergen
>> > > > >
>> > > > [1]
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>  https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt#L12
>> < https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt*L12__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!kZ1JQFRS2pXj_IuXBhvYhmP9Q_svcLyjCXK9465ULGB4MeiYPRz2cF7lepHggr9UxPU9zOBEUw$ >
>> >
>> < https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt*L12__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!kvDgy3X0IuSQk7D2DdsGtsjtyGroYbNKOrPG95OpyoAkuBVbFSmzozwfor05jkRl0ita0FumBw$ >
>> > >
>> >
>> < https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt*L12__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!gi81oZZNvWaFWUVnaZluA_mNBAItLMd4RZmnc-M_FmlpDojqeQQnS7aXSNlbo80re9uOl2wqFA$ >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> < https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt*L12__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!mz3gn1wQMX2DXeNuAV-1_dI7nxFYYZOgdPiJNSFMesCz9lAzOKlwVPlddbxbcLmUO44NOy0TFA$ >
>> > > >
>> > > > Best regards,
>> > > >   Alexander Sychev
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>[1]  https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.5/source/drivers/xen/gntdev.c#L300
>[2]  https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.5/source/drivers/xen/gntdev.c#L319
 

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 12521 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 157 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re[2]: [Xen-devel] PV DRM doesn't work without auto_translated_physmap feature in Dom0
  2020-02-06  8:20     ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
  2020-02-07 19:55       ` Santucco
@ 2020-04-19 11:26       ` Santucco
  2020-04-20  5:59         ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Santucco @ 2020-04-19 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Oleksandr Andrushchenko; +Cc: xen-devel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8647 bytes --]


Hello,
 
I have found a source of the problem.
In displ_be,  BaseDump copies to the drm buffer with a size from i915 drm driver, but this size a bit more than a size of my frontend display buffer. I have made a quick and dirty fix, a copy a line of my display buffer to a middle of a line of the drm display buffer. Patch is attached.
 
Best regards,
Alexander 
>Четверг, 6 февраля 2020, 11:20 +03:00 от Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>:
> 
>On 2/5/20 8:59 PM, Santucco wrote:
>> Hello,
>> Ok, I  commented out the memcpy call and run the test.
>> displ_be hasn’t crached, I have seen FLIP events in the log.
>> But there hasn’t been the black screen, just a blink effect every
>> couple of seconds.
>> Logs are attached.
>Ok, so I believe that frontend - backend (displ_be) communication is ok
>and there is nothing to do there.
>
>Next, I would start debugging the following in Xen:
>(XEN) mm.c:2223:d2v0 Bad L1 flags 80
>and have a look at [1]. Probably, someone on Xen x86 side can tell
>if this could be related to the flags at [2].
>
>> Best regards,
>> Alexander
>>
>> Среда, 5 февраля 2020, 9:31 +03:00 от Oleksandr Andrushchenko
>> < oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com >:
>> On 2/4/20 10:28 AM, Santucco wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> > displ_be was compiled without zero-copy support early.
>> > I have tried with the recompiled dom0 kernel, a result is the same.
>> > Logs and configs (+displ_be’s CMakeCache.txt ) are attached.
>> Ok, yet another test to localize the problem.
>> Could you please remove memcpy from
>> #1  0x000055e5a1f28bec in Drm::DumbDrm::copy (this=0x7f9338000e00) at
>> /home/santucco/tmp/xen-troops/displ_be/src/displayBackend/drm/Dumb.cpp:149
>> and just memset the destination with 0 or whatever.
>>
>> I expect that system won't crash, nothing will be shown (black
>> screen), but
>> displ_be will show page flip events in its logs.
>> > Best regards,
>> > Alexander
>> >
>> > Понедельник, 3 февраля 2020, 10:36 +03:00 от Oleksandr
>> > Andrushchenko < oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com
>> </compose?To=oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>>:
>> >
>> >
>> > On 2/1/20 4:39 PM, Santucco wrote:
>> > > Hello again,
>> > > I have not yet made to work my drm client, so I have tried to run
>> > > linux like a domU (to see how it should work), it doesn’t work too
>> > > — displ_be catches SIGSEGV:
>> > >
>> > > #0  0x00007f4afed1c161 in ?? () from /lib64/libc.so.6
>> > > #1  0x000055723b9c5bec in Drm::DumbDrm::copy
>> > (this=0x7f4adc000e00) at
>> > >
>> >
>> /home/santucco/tmp/xen-troops/displ_be/src/displayBackend/drm/Dumb.cpp:149
>> > > #2  0x000055723b9a8f51 in BuffersStorage::getFrameBufferAndCopy
>> > > (this=0x7f4ae00010e0, fbCookie=18446612682295083264) at
>> > >
>> >
>> /home/santucco/tmp/xen-troops/displ_be/src/displayBackend/BuffersStorage.cpp:165
>> > > It tries to copy to mBuffer with non-accessible address.
>> > > For the moment I see a strange offset for mmap call of
>> > /dev/drm/card0
>> > > in the strace log — 0x100000000. Is that normal?
>> > > Any direction of which to dig will be very helpful.
>> > > Configuration details:
>> > > Xen 4.12.1 Dom0: Linux 4.20.17-gentoo #13 SMP Sat Dec 28
>> > 11:12:24 MSK
>> > > 2019 x86_64 Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N3050 @ 1.60GHz GenuineIntel
>> > GNU/Linux
>> > > DomU: Linux 4.20.17-gentoo
>> > > last xen-troops/libxenbe and xen-troops/displ_be
>> > > Logs (dmesg, xl dmesg, displ_be, strace log of displ_be), a
>> > backtrace
>> > > of gdb and kernel configs are attached.
>> > > Thanks in advance.
>> > Could you please try Dom0 kernel WITHOUT the options below:
>> > CONFIG_XEN_GNTDEV_DMABUF=y
>> > CONFIG_XEN_GRANT_DMA_ALLOC=y
>> >
>> > Then, just to make sure, did you build displ_be without zero-copy
>> > support?
>> >
>> > > On 1/8/20 5:38 PM, Santucco wrote:
>> > > > Thank you very much for all your answers.
>> > > >
>> > > > Среда, 8 января 2020, 10:54 +03:00 от Oleksandr Andrushchenko
>> > > > < oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com
>> </compose?To=oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>
>> > > > </compose?To=oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>>:
>> > > > On 1/6/20 10:38 AM, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>> > > > > On 06.01.20 08:56, Santucco wrote:
>> > > > >> Hello,
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> I’m trying to use vdispl interface from PV OS, it doesn’t
>> work.
>> > > > >> Configuration details:
>> > > > >>      Xen 4.12.1
>> > > > >>      Dom0: Linux 4.20.17-gentoo #13 SMP Sat Dec 28
>> 11:12:24 MSK
>> > > > 2019
>> > > > >> x86_64 Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N3050 @ 1.60GHz GenuineIntel
>> > > > GNU/Linux
>> > > > >>      DomU: x86 Plan9, PV
>> > > > >> displ_be as a backend for vdispl and vkb
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> when VM starts, displ_be reports about an error:
>> > > > >> gnttab: error: ioctl DMABUF_EXP_FROM_REFS failed: Invalid
>> > argument
>> > > > >> (displ_be.log:221)
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> related Dom0 output is:
>> > > > >> [ 191.579278] Cannot provide dma-buf: use_ptemode 1
>> > > > >> (dmesg.create.log:123)
>> > > > >
>> > > > > This seems to be a limitation of the xen dma-buf driver.
>> It was
>> > > > written
>> > > > > for being used on ARM initially where PV is not available.
>> > > > This is true and we never tried/targeted PV domains with this
>> > > > implementation,
>> > > > so if there is a need for that someone has to take a look on the
>> > > > proper
>> > > > implementation for PV…
>> > > >
>> > > > Have I got your right and there is no the proper
>> > implementation :-)?
>> > > There is no
>> > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > CC-ing Oleksandr Andrushchenko who is the author of that
>> > driver. He
>> > > > > should be able to tell us what would be needed to enable PV
>> > dom0.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Depending on your use case it might be possible to use PVH
>> > dom0, but
>> > > > > support for this mode is "experimental" only and some features
>> > > > are not
>> > > > > yet working.
>> > > > >
>> > > > Well, one of the workarounds possible is to drop zero-copying
>> > use-case
>> > > > (this is why display backend tries to create dmu-bufs from
>> grants
>> > > > passed
>> > > > by the guest domain and fails because of "Cannot provide
>> dma-buf:
>> > > > use_ptemode 1")
>> > > > So, in this case display backend will do memory copying for the
>> > > > incoming
>> > > > frames
>> > > > and won't touch DMABUF_EXP_FROM_REFS ioctl.
>> > > > To do so just disable zero-copying while building the
>> backend [1]
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks, I have just tried the workaround. The backend has failed
>> > > > in an other place not corresponding with dma_buf.
>> > > > Anyway it is enough to continue debugging  my
>> > frontend implementation.
>> > > > Do you know how big is performance penalty in comparison with
>> > > > the zero-copy variant?
>> > > Well, it solely depends on your setup, so I cannot tell what
>> > > would the numbers be in your case. Comparing to what I have
>> doesn't
>> > > make any sense to me: one should compare apples to apples
>> > > > Does it make a sense if I make a dedicated HVM domain with
>> > linux only
>> > > > for the purpose of vdispl and vkbd backends? Is there a
>> hope this
>> > > > approach will work?
>> > > You can try if this approach fits your design and requirements
>> > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Juergen
>> > > > >
>> > > > [1]
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>  https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt#L12
>> < https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt*L12__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!kZ1JQFRS2pXj_IuXBhvYhmP9Q_svcLyjCXK9465ULGB4MeiYPRz2cF7lepHggr9UxPU9zOBEUw$ >
>> >
>> < https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt*L12__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!kvDgy3X0IuSQk7D2DdsGtsjtyGroYbNKOrPG95OpyoAkuBVbFSmzozwfor05jkRl0ita0FumBw$ >
>> > >
>> >
>> < https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt*L12__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!gi81oZZNvWaFWUVnaZluA_mNBAItLMd4RZmnc-M_FmlpDojqeQQnS7aXSNlbo80re9uOl2wqFA$ >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> < https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt*L12__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!mz3gn1wQMX2DXeNuAV-1_dI7nxFYYZOgdPiJNSFMesCz9lAzOKlwVPlddbxbcLmUO44NOy0TFA$ >
>> > > >
>> > > > Best regards,
>> > > >   Alexander Sychev
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>[1]  https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.5/source/drivers/xen/gntdev.c#L300
>[2]  https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.5/source/drivers/xen/gntdev.c#L319
 

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 12816 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: patch --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 1601 bytes --]

diff --git a/src/displayBackend/drm/Dumb.cpp b/src/displayBackend/drm/Dumb.cpp
index f4126aa..bb1f1d2 100644
--- a/src/displayBackend/drm/Dumb.cpp
+++ b/src/displayBackend/drm/Dumb.cpp
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ DumbBase::DumbBase(int drmFd, uint32_t width, uint32_t height) :
 	mDrmFd(drmFd),
 	mBufDrmHandle(0),
 	mStride(0),
+	mFrontStride(0),
 	mWidth(width),
 	mHeight(height),
 	mName(0),
@@ -93,6 +94,8 @@ void DumbBase::createDumb(uint32_t bpp)
 {
 	drm_mode_create_dumb creq {0};
 
+	mFrontStride = 4 * ((mWidth * bpp + 31) / 32);
+
 	creq.width = mWidth;
 	creq.height = mHeight;
 	creq.bpp = bpp;
@@ -145,8 +148,18 @@ void DumbDrm::copy()
 	}
 
 	DLOG(mLog, DEBUG) << "Copy dumb, handle: " << mBufDrmHandle;
-
-	memcpy(mBuffer, mGnttabBuffer->get(), mSize);
+	if(mStride == mFrontStride)
+	{
+		memcpy(mBuffer, mGnttabBuffer->get(), mSize);
+		return;
+	}
+	auto diff = (mStride - mFrontStride + 1) / 2;
+	auto src = reinterpret_cast<unsigned char*>(mGnttabBuffer->get());
+	auto dst = reinterpret_cast<unsigned char*>(mBuffer);
+	for(unsigned int i = 0; i < mHeight; i++)
+	{
+		memcpy(dst + diff + i * mStride, src + i * mFrontStride, mFrontStride);
+	}
 }
 
 /*******************************************************************************
diff --git a/src/displayBackend/drm/Dumb.hpp b/src/displayBackend/drm/Dumb.hpp
index 2a11b5d..04a137d 100644
--- a/src/displayBackend/drm/Dumb.hpp
+++ b/src/displayBackend/drm/Dumb.hpp
@@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ protected:
 	int mDrmFd;
 	uint32_t mBufDrmHandle;
 	uint32_t mStride;
+	uint32_t mFrontStride;
 	uint32_t mWidth;
 	uint32_t mHeight;
 	uint32_t mName;

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [Xen-devel] PV DRM doesn't work without auto_translated_physmap feature in Dom0
  2020-04-19 11:26       ` Re[2]: " Santucco
@ 2020-04-20  5:59         ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
  2020-04-20 12:55           ` Re[2]: " Santucco
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko @ 2020-04-20  5:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Santucco; +Cc: xen-devel, Oleksandr Grytsov

Hi,

On 4/19/20 14:26, Santucco wrote:
> Hello,
> I have found a source of the problem.
> In displ_be,  BaseDump copies to the drm buffer with a size from 
> i915 drm driver, but this size a bit more than a size of my frontend 
> display buffer. I have made a quick and dirty fix, a copy a line of my 
> display buffer to a middle of a line of the drm display buffer. Patch 
> is attached.

Thank you for the patch and your efforts to fix the issue.

Could you please make a pull request to [1], so we can continue there?

Thank you in advance,

Oleksandr

> Best regards,
> Alexander
>
>     Четверг, 6 февраля 2020, 11:20 +03:00 от Oleksandr Andrushchenko
>     <oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>:
>     On 2/5/20 8:59 PM, Santucco wrote:
>     > Hello,
>     > Ok, I  commented out the memcpy call and run the test.
>     > displ_be hasn’t crached, I have seen FLIP events in the log.
>     > But there hasn’t been the black screen, just a blink effect every
>     > couple of seconds.
>     > Logs are attached.
>     Ok, so I believe that frontend - backend (displ_be) communication
>     is ok
>     and there is nothing to do there.
>
>     Next, I would start debugging the following in Xen:
>     (XEN) mm.c:2223:d2v0 Bad L1 flags 80
>     and have a look at [1]. Probably, someone on Xen x86 side can tell
>     if this could be related to the flags at [2].
>
>     > Best regards,
>     > Alexander
>     >
>     > Среда, 5 февраля 2020, 9:31 +03:00 от Oleksandr Andrushchenko
>     > <oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com
>     </compose?To=oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>>:
>     > On 2/4/20 10:28 AM, Santucco wrote:
>     > > Hello,
>     > > displ_be was compiled without zero-copy support early.
>     > > I have tried with the recompiled dom0 kernel, a result is the
>     same.
>     > > Logs and configs (+displ_be’s CMakeCache.txt ) are attached.
>     > Ok, yet another test to localize the problem.
>     > Could you please remove memcpy from
>     > #1  0x000055e5a1f28bec in Drm::DumbDrm::copy
>     (this=0x7f9338000e00) at
>     >
>     /home/santucco/tmp/xen-troops/displ_be/src/displayBackend/drm/Dumb.cpp:149
>     > and just memset the destination with 0 or whatever.
>     >
>     > I expect that system won't crash, nothing will be shown (black
>     > screen), but
>     > displ_be will show page flip events in its logs.
>     > > Best regards,
>     > > Alexander
>     > >
>     > > Понедельник, 3 февраля 2020, 10:36 +03:00 от Oleksandr
>     > > Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com
>     </compose?To=oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>
>     > </compose?To=oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>>:
>     > >
>     > >
>     > > On 2/1/20 4:39 PM, Santucco wrote:
>     > > > Hello again,
>     > > > I have not yet made to work my drm client, so I have tried
>     to run
>     > > > linux like a domU (to see how it should work), it doesn’t
>     work too
>     > > > — displ_be catches SIGSEGV:
>     > > >
>     > > > #0  0x00007f4afed1c161 in ?? () from /lib64/libc.so.6
>     > > > #1  0x000055723b9c5bec in Drm::DumbDrm::copy
>     > > (this=0x7f4adc000e00) at
>     > > >
>     > >
>     >
>     /home/santucco/tmp/xen-troops/displ_be/src/displayBackend/drm/Dumb.cpp:149
>     > > > #2  0x000055723b9a8f51 in BuffersStorage::getFrameBufferAndCopy
>     > > > (this=0x7f4ae00010e0, fbCookie=18446612682295083264) at
>     > > >
>     > >
>     >
>     /home/santucco/tmp/xen-troops/displ_be/src/displayBackend/BuffersStorage.cpp:165
>     > > > It tries to copy to mBuffer with non-accessible address.
>     > > > For the moment I see a strange offset for mmap call of
>     > > /dev/drm/card0
>     > > > in the strace log — 0x100000000. Is that normal?
>     > > > Any direction of which to dig will be very helpful.
>     > > > Configuration details:
>     > > > Xen 4.12.1 Dom0: Linux 4.20.17-gentoo #13 SMP Sat Dec 28
>     > > 11:12:24 MSK
>     > > > 2019 x86_64 Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N3050 @ 1.60GHz GenuineIntel
>     > > GNU/Linux
>     > > > DomU: Linux 4.20.17-gentoo
>     > > > last xen-troops/libxenbe and xen-troops/displ_be
>     > > > Logs (dmesg, xl dmesg, displ_be, strace log of displ_be), a
>     > > backtrace
>     > > > of gdb and kernel configs are attached.
>     > > > Thanks in advance.
>     > > Could you please try Dom0 kernel WITHOUT the options below:
>     > > CONFIG_XEN_GNTDEV_DMABUF=y
>     > > CONFIG_XEN_GRANT_DMA_ALLOC=y
>     > >
>     > > Then, just to make sure, did you build displ_be without zero-copy
>     > > support?
>     > >
>     > > > On 1/8/20 5:38 PM, Santucco wrote:
>     > > > > Thank you very much for all your answers.
>     > > > >
>     > > > > Среда, 8 января 2020, 10:54 +03:00 от Oleksandr Andrushchenko
>     > > > > <oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com
>     </compose?To=oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>
>     > </compose?To=oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>
>     > > > > </compose?To=oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>>:
>     > > > > On 1/6/20 10:38 AM, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>     > > > > > On 06.01.20 08:56, Santucco wrote:
>     > > > > >> Hello,
>     > > > > >>
>     > > > > >> I’m trying to use vdispl interface from PV OS, it doesn’t
>     > work.
>     > > > > >> Configuration details:
>     > > > > >>      Xen 4.12.1
>     > > > > >>      Dom0: Linux 4.20.17-gentoo #13 SMP Sat Dec 28
>     > 11:12:24 MSK
>     > > > > 2019
>     > > > > >> x86_64 Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N3050 @ 1.60GHz GenuineIntel
>     > > > > GNU/Linux
>     > > > > >>      DomU: x86 Plan9, PV
>     > > > > >> displ_be as a backend for vdispl and vkb
>     > > > > >>
>     > > > > >> when VM starts, displ_be reports about an error:
>     > > > > >> gnttab: error: ioctl DMABUF_EXP_FROM_REFS failed: Invalid
>     > > argument
>     > > > > >> (displ_be.log:221)
>     > > > > >>
>     > > > > >> related Dom0 output is:
>     > > > > >> [ 191.579278] Cannot provide dma-buf: use_ptemode 1
>     > > > > >> (dmesg.create.log:123)
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > > This seems to be a limitation of the xen dma-buf driver.
>     > It was
>     > > > > written
>     > > > > > for being used on ARM initially where PV is not available.
>     > > > > This is true and we never tried/targeted PV domains with this
>     > > > > implementation,
>     > > > > so if there is a need for that someone has to take a look
>     on the
>     > > > > proper
>     > > > > implementation for PV…
>     > > > >
>     > > > > Have I got your right and there is no the proper
>     > > implementation :-)?
>     > > > There is no
>     > > > >
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > > CC-ing Oleksandr Andrushchenko who is the author of that
>     > > driver. He
>     > > > > > should be able to tell us what would be needed to enable PV
>     > > dom0.
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > > Depending on your use case it might be possible to use PVH
>     > > dom0, but
>     > > > > > support for this mode is "experimental" only and some
>     features
>     > > > > are not
>     > > > > > yet working.
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > Well, one of the workarounds possible is to drop zero-copying
>     > > use-case
>     > > > > (this is why display backend tries to create dmu-bufs from
>     > grants
>     > > > > passed
>     > > > > by the guest domain and fails because of "Cannot provide
>     > dma-buf:
>     > > > > use_ptemode 1")
>     > > > > So, in this case display backend will do memory copying
>     for the
>     > > > > incoming
>     > > > > frames
>     > > > > and won't touch DMABUF_EXP_FROM_REFS ioctl.
>     > > > > To do so just disable zero-copying while building the
>     > backend [1]
>     > > > >
>     > > > > Thanks, I have just tried the workaround. The backend
>     has failed
>     > > > > in an other place not corresponding with dma_buf.
>     > > > > Anyway it is enough to continue debugging  my
>     > > frontend implementation.
>     > > > > Do you know how big is performance penalty in comparison with
>     > > > > the zero-copy variant?
>     > > > Well, it solely depends on your setup, so I cannot tell what
>     > > > would the numbers be in your case. Comparing to what I have
>     > doesn't
>     > > > make any sense to me: one should compare apples to apples
>     > > > > Does it make a sense if I make a dedicated HVM domain with
>     > > linux only
>     > > > > for the purpose of vdispl and vkbd backends? Is there a
>     > hope this
>     > > > > approach will work?
>     > > > You can try if this approach fits your design and requirements
>     > > > >
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > > Juergen
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > [1]
>     > > > >
>     > > >
>     > >
>     >
>     https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt#L12
>     <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt*L12__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!mhlQAPS_Ozy57xa_0OR66qc1mjlSEz7lj3MkWCyDDF91BGa7J7-BOYWYcdksplocZvxIZMirWg$>
>     >
>     <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt*L12__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!kZ1JQFRS2pXj_IuXBhvYhmP9Q_svcLyjCXK9465ULGB4MeiYPRz2cF7lepHggr9UxPU9zOBEUw$>
>     > >
>     >
>     <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt*L12__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!kvDgy3X0IuSQk7D2DdsGtsjtyGroYbNKOrPG95OpyoAkuBVbFSmzozwfor05jkRl0ita0FumBw$>
>     > > >
>     > >
>     >
>     <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt*L12__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!gi81oZZNvWaFWUVnaZluA_mNBAItLMd4RZmnc-M_FmlpDojqeQQnS7aXSNlbo80re9uOl2wqFA$>
>     > > > >
>     > > >
>     > >
>     >
>     <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt*L12__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!mz3gn1wQMX2DXeNuAV-1_dI7nxFYYZOgdPiJNSFMesCz9lAzOKlwVPlddbxbcLmUO44NOy0TFA$>
>     > > > >
>     > > > > Best regards,
>     > > > >   Alexander Sychev
>     > > >
>     > >
>     > >
>     >
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >
>     [1]
>     https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.5/source/drivers/xen/gntdev.c#L300
>     <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.5/source/drivers/xen/gntdev.c*L300__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!mhlQAPS_Ozy57xa_0OR66qc1mjlSEz7lj3MkWCyDDF91BGa7J7-BOYWYcdksplocZvzn6flk6Q$>
>     [2]
>     https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.5/source/drivers/xen/gntdev.c#L319
>     <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.5/source/drivers/xen/gntdev.c*L319__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!mhlQAPS_Ozy57xa_0OR66qc1mjlSEz7lj3MkWCyDDF91BGa7J7-BOYWYcdksplocZvwjOfYJxg$>
>

[1] https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re[2]: [Xen-devel] PV DRM doesn't work without auto_translated_physmap feature in Dom0
  2020-04-20  5:59         ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
@ 2020-04-20 12:55           ` Santucco
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Santucco @ 2020-04-20 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Oleksandr Andrushchenko; +Cc: xen-devel, Oleksandr Grytsov

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 10392 bytes --]


Sure.
 
I will make it a bit later, when I have the more stable result.
 
Best regards,
Alexander
 
  
>Понедельник, 20 апреля 2020, 8:59 +03:00 от Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>:
> 
>Hi,
>
>On 4/19/20 14:26, Santucco wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I have found a source of the problem.
>> In displ_be,  BaseDump copies to the drm buffer with a size from
>> i915 drm driver, but this size a bit more than a size of my frontend
>> display buffer. I have made a quick and dirty fix, a copy a line of my
>> display buffer to a middle of a line of the drm display buffer. Patch
>> is attached.
>
>Thank you for the patch and your efforts to fix the issue.
>
>Could you please make a pull request to [1], so we can continue there?
>
>Thank you in advance,
>
>Oleksandr
>
>> Best regards,
>> Alexander
>>
>> Четверг, 6 февраля 2020, 11:20 +03:00 от Oleksandr Andrushchenko
>> < oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com >:
>> On 2/5/20 8:59 PM, Santucco wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> > Ok, I  commented out the memcpy call and run the test.
>> > displ_be hasn’t crached, I have seen FLIP events in the log.
>> > But there hasn’t been the black screen, just a blink effect every
>> > couple of seconds.
>> > Logs are attached.
>> Ok, so I believe that frontend - backend (displ_be) communication
>> is ok
>> and there is nothing to do there.
>>
>> Next, I would start debugging the following in Xen:
>> (XEN) mm.c:2223:d2v0 Bad L1 flags 80
>> and have a look at [1]. Probably, someone on Xen x86 side can tell
>> if this could be related to the flags at [2].
>>
>> > Best regards,
>> > Alexander
>> >
>> > Среда, 5 февраля 2020, 9:31 +03:00 от Oleksandr Andrushchenko
>> > < oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com
>> </compose?To=oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>>:
>> > On 2/4/20 10:28 AM, Santucco wrote:
>> > > Hello,
>> > > displ_be was compiled without zero-copy support early.
>> > > I have tried with the recompiled dom0 kernel, a result is the
>> same.
>> > > Logs and configs (+displ_be’s CMakeCache.txt ) are attached.
>> > Ok, yet another test to localize the problem.
>> > Could you please remove memcpy from
>> > #1  0x000055e5a1f28bec in Drm::DumbDrm::copy
>> (this=0x7f9338000e00) at
>> >
>> /home/santucco/tmp/xen-troops/displ_be/src/displayBackend/drm/Dumb.cpp:149
>> > and just memset the destination with 0 or whatever.
>> >
>> > I expect that system won't crash, nothing will be shown (black
>> > screen), but
>> > displ_be will show page flip events in its logs.
>> > > Best regards,
>> > > Alexander
>> > >
>> > > Понедельник, 3 февраля 2020, 10:36 +03:00 от Oleksandr
>> > > Andrushchenko < oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com
>> </compose?To=oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>
>> > </compose?To=oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>>:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 2/1/20 4:39 PM, Santucco wrote:
>> > > > Hello again,
>> > > > I have not yet made to work my drm client, so I have tried
>> to run
>> > > > linux like a domU (to see how it should work), it doesn’t
>> work too
>> > > > — displ_be catches SIGSEGV:
>> > > >
>> > > > #0  0x00007f4afed1c161 in ?? () from /lib64/libc.so.6
>> > > > #1  0x000055723b9c5bec in Drm::DumbDrm::copy
>> > > (this=0x7f4adc000e00) at
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> /home/santucco/tmp/xen-troops/displ_be/src/displayBackend/drm/Dumb.cpp:149
>> > > > #2  0x000055723b9a8f51 in BuffersStorage::getFrameBufferAndCopy
>> > > > (this=0x7f4ae00010e0, fbCookie=18446612682295083264) at
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> /home/santucco/tmp/xen-troops/displ_be/src/displayBackend/BuffersStorage.cpp:165
>> > > > It tries to copy to mBuffer with non-accessible address.
>> > > > For the moment I see a strange offset for mmap call of
>> > > /dev/drm/card0
>> > > > in the strace log — 0x100000000. Is that normal?
>> > > > Any direction of which to dig will be very helpful.
>> > > > Configuration details:
>> > > > Xen 4.12.1 Dom0: Linux 4.20.17-gentoo #13 SMP Sat Dec 28
>> > > 11:12:24 MSK
>> > > > 2019 x86_64 Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N3050 @ 1.60GHz GenuineIntel
>> > > GNU/Linux
>> > > > DomU: Linux 4.20.17-gentoo
>> > > > last xen-troops/libxenbe and xen-troops/displ_be
>> > > > Logs (dmesg, xl dmesg, displ_be, strace log of displ_be), a
>> > > backtrace
>> > > > of gdb and kernel configs are attached.
>> > > > Thanks in advance.
>> > > Could you please try Dom0 kernel WITHOUT the options below:
>> > > CONFIG_XEN_GNTDEV_DMABUF=y
>> > > CONFIG_XEN_GRANT_DMA_ALLOC=y
>> > >
>> > > Then, just to make sure, did you build displ_be without zero-copy
>> > > support?
>> > >
>> > > > On 1/8/20 5:38 PM, Santucco wrote:
>> > > > > Thank you very much for all your answers.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Среда, 8 января 2020, 10:54 +03:00 от Oleksandr Andrushchenko
>> > > > > < oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com
>> </compose?To=oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>
>> > </compose?To=oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>
>> > > > > </compose?To=oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>>:
>> > > > > On 1/6/20 10:38 AM, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>> > > > > > On 06.01.20 08:56, Santucco wrote:
>> > > > > >> Hello,
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> I’m trying to use vdispl interface from PV OS, it doesn’t
>> > work.
>> > > > > >> Configuration details:
>> > > > > >>      Xen 4.12.1
>> > > > > >>      Dom0: Linux 4.20.17-gentoo #13 SMP Sat Dec 28
>> > 11:12:24 MSK
>> > > > > 2019
>> > > > > >> x86_64 Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N3050 @ 1.60GHz GenuineIntel
>> > > > > GNU/Linux
>> > > > > >>      DomU: x86 Plan9, PV
>> > > > > >> displ_be as a backend for vdispl and vkb
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> when VM starts, displ_be reports about an error:
>> > > > > >> gnttab: error: ioctl DMABUF_EXP_FROM_REFS failed: Invalid
>> > > argument
>> > > > > >> (displ_be.log:221)
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> related Dom0 output is:
>> > > > > >> [ 191.579278] Cannot provide dma-buf: use_ptemode 1
>> > > > > >> (dmesg.create.log:123)
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > This seems to be a limitation of the xen dma-buf driver.
>> > It was
>> > > > > written
>> > > > > > for being used on ARM initially where PV is not available.
>> > > > > This is true and we never tried/targeted PV domains with this
>> > > > > implementation,
>> > > > > so if there is a need for that someone has to take a look
>> on the
>> > > > > proper
>> > > > > implementation for PV…
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Have I got your right and there is no the proper
>> > > implementation :-)?
>> > > > There is no
>> > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > CC-ing Oleksandr Andrushchenko who is the author of that
>> > > driver. He
>> > > > > > should be able to tell us what would be needed to enable PV
>> > > dom0.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Depending on your use case it might be possible to use PVH
>> > > dom0, but
>> > > > > > support for this mode is "experimental" only and some
>> features
>> > > > > are not
>> > > > > > yet working.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > Well, one of the workarounds possible is to drop zero-copying
>> > > use-case
>> > > > > (this is why display backend tries to create dmu-bufs from
>> > grants
>> > > > > passed
>> > > > > by the guest domain and fails because of "Cannot provide
>> > dma-buf:
>> > > > > use_ptemode 1")
>> > > > > So, in this case display backend will do memory copying
>> for the
>> > > > > incoming
>> > > > > frames
>> > > > > and won't touch DMABUF_EXP_FROM_REFS ioctl.
>> > > > > To do so just disable zero-copying while building the
>> > backend [1]
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thanks, I have just tried the workaround. The backend
>> has failed
>> > > > > in an other place not corresponding with dma_buf.
>> > > > > Anyway it is enough to continue debugging  my
>> > > frontend implementation.
>> > > > > Do you know how big is performance penalty in comparison with
>> > > > > the zero-copy variant?
>> > > > Well, it solely depends on your setup, so I cannot tell what
>> > > > would the numbers be in your case. Comparing to what I have
>> > doesn't
>> > > > make any sense to me: one should compare apples to apples
>> > > > > Does it make a sense if I make a dedicated HVM domain with
>> > > linux only
>> > > > > for the purpose of vdispl and vkbd backends? Is there a
>> > hope this
>> > > > > approach will work?
>> > > > You can try if this approach fits your design and requirements
>> > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Juergen
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > [1]
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>  https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt#L12
>> < https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt*L12__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!mhlQAPS_Ozy57xa_0OR66qc1mjlSEz7lj3MkWCyDDF91BGa7J7-BOYWYcdksplocZvxIZMirWg$ >
>> >
>> < https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt*L12__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!kZ1JQFRS2pXj_IuXBhvYhmP9Q_svcLyjCXK9465ULGB4MeiYPRz2cF7lepHggr9UxPU9zOBEUw$ >
>> > >
>> >
>> < https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt*L12__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!kvDgy3X0IuSQk7D2DdsGtsjtyGroYbNKOrPG95OpyoAkuBVbFSmzozwfor05jkRl0ita0FumBw$ >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> < https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt*L12__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!gi81oZZNvWaFWUVnaZluA_mNBAItLMd4RZmnc-M_FmlpDojqeQQnS7aXSNlbo80re9uOl2wqFA$ >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> < https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt*L12__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!mz3gn1wQMX2DXeNuAV-1_dI7nxFYYZOgdPiJNSFMesCz9lAzOKlwVPlddbxbcLmUO44NOy0TFA$ >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Best regards,
>> > > > >   Alexander Sychev
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> [1]
>>  https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.5/source/drivers/xen/gntdev.c#L300
>> < https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.5/source/drivers/xen/gntdev.c*L300__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!mhlQAPS_Ozy57xa_0OR66qc1mjlSEz7lj3MkWCyDDF91BGa7J7-BOYWYcdksplocZvzn6flk6Q$ >
>> [2]
>>  https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.5/source/drivers/xen/gntdev.c#L319
>> < https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.5/source/drivers/xen/gntdev.c*L319__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!mhlQAPS_Ozy57xa_0OR66qc1mjlSEz7lj3MkWCyDDF91BGa7J7-BOYWYcdksplocZvwjOfYJxg$ >
>>
>
>[1]  https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be
 

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 16245 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-04-20 12:56 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-02-04  8:28 [Xen-devel] PV DRM doesn't work without auto_translated_physmap feature in Dom0 Santucco
2020-02-05  6:31 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2020-02-05 18:59   ` Santucco
2020-02-06  8:20     ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2020-02-07 19:55       ` Santucco
2020-04-19 11:26       ` Re[2]: " Santucco
2020-04-20  5:59         ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2020-04-20 12:55           ` Re[2]: " Santucco

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).