xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vikram Garhwal <fnu.vikram@xilinx.com>
To: <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: <sstabellini@kernel.org>, <julien@xen.org>,
	<bertrand.marquis@arm.com>, <volodymyr_babchuk@epam.com>,
	Vikram Garhwal <fnu.vikram@xilinx.com>,
	Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com>
Subject: [XEN][RFC PATCH v2 01/12] device tree: Remove __init from function type
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 23:02:16 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1636441347-133850-2-git-send-email-fnu.vikram@xilinx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1636441347-133850-1-git-send-email-fnu.vikram@xilinx.com>

Change function type of following function to access during runtime:
    1. map_irq_to_domain()
    2. handle_device_interrupt()
    3. map_range_to_domain()
    4. unflatten_dt_node()
    5. unflatten_device_tree()

Move map_irq_to_domain(), handle_device_interrupt() and map_range_to_domain() to
device.c.

Move map_range_data declaration to domain_build.h.

These changes are done to support the dynamic programming of a nodes where an
overlay node will be added to fdt and unflattened node will be added to dt_host.
Furthermore, IRQ and mmio mapping will be done for the added node.

Signed-off-by: Vikram Garhwal <fnu.vikram@xilinx.com>
---
 xen/arch/arm/device.c              | 146 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c        | 150 -------------------------------------
 xen/common/device_tree.c           |  18 ++---
 xen/include/asm-arm/domain_build.h |  10 +++
 xen/include/xen/device_tree.h      |   5 ++
 5 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 159 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/device.c b/xen/arch/arm/device.c
index 70cd6c1..c7cf2b9 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/device.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/device.c
@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
 #include <xen/errno.h>
 #include <xen/init.h>
 #include <xen/lib.h>
+#include <xen/iocap.h>
+#include <asm/domain_build.h>
 
 extern const struct device_desc _sdevice[], _edevice[];
 extern const struct acpi_device_desc _asdevice[], _aedevice[];
@@ -84,6 +86,150 @@ enum device_class device_get_class(const struct dt_device_node *dev)
     return DEVICE_UNKNOWN;
 }
 
+int map_irq_to_domain(struct domain *d, unsigned int irq,
+                             bool need_mapping, const char *devname)
+{
+    int res;
+
+    res = irq_permit_access(d, irq);
+    if ( res )
+    {
+        printk(XENLOG_ERR "Unable to permit to dom%u access to IRQ %u\n",
+               d->domain_id, irq);
+        return res;
+    }
+
+    if ( need_mapping )
+    {
+        /*
+         * Checking the return of vgic_reserve_virq is not
+         * necessary. It should not fail except when we try to map
+         * the IRQ twice. This can legitimately happen if the IRQ is shared
+         */
+        vgic_reserve_virq(d, irq);
+
+        res = route_irq_to_guest(d, irq, irq, devname);
+        if ( res < 0 )
+        {
+            printk(XENLOG_ERR "Unable to map IRQ%"PRId32" to dom%d\n",
+                   irq, d->domain_id);
+            return res;
+        }
+    }
+
+    dt_dprintk("  - IRQ: %u\n", irq);
+    return 0;
+}
+
+int map_range_to_domain(const struct dt_device_node *dev,
+                                      u64 addr, u64 len,
+                                      void *data)
+{
+    struct map_range_data *mr_data = data;
+    struct domain *d = mr_data->d;
+    bool need_mapping = !dt_device_for_passthrough(dev);
+    int res;
+
+    /*
+     * reserved-memory regions are RAM carved out for a special purpose.
+     * They are not MMIO and therefore a domain should not be able to
+     * manage them via the IOMEM interface.
+     */
+    if ( strncasecmp(dt_node_full_name(dev), "/reserved-memory/",
+                     strlen("/reserved-memory/")) != 0 )
+    {
+        res = iomem_permit_access(d, paddr_to_pfn(addr),
+                paddr_to_pfn(PAGE_ALIGN(addr + len - 1)));
+        if ( res )
+        {
+            printk(XENLOG_ERR "Unable to permit to dom%d access to"
+                    " 0x%"PRIx64" - 0x%"PRIx64"\n",
+                    d->domain_id,
+                    addr & PAGE_MASK, PAGE_ALIGN(addr + len) - 1);
+            return res;
+        }
+    }
+
+    if ( need_mapping )
+    {
+        res = map_regions_p2mt(d,
+                               gaddr_to_gfn(addr),
+                               PFN_UP(len),
+                               maddr_to_mfn(addr),
+                               mr_data->p2mt);
+
+        if ( res < 0 )
+        {
+            printk(XENLOG_ERR "Unable to map 0x%"PRIx64
+                   " - 0x%"PRIx64" in domain %d\n",
+                   addr & PAGE_MASK, PAGE_ALIGN(addr + len) - 1,
+                   d->domain_id);
+            return res;
+        }
+    }
+
+    dt_dprintk("  - MMIO: %010"PRIx64" - %010"PRIx64" P2MType=%x\n",
+               addr, addr + len, mr_data->p2mt);
+
+    return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * handle_device_interrupts retrieves the interrupts configuration from
+ * a device tree node and maps those interrupts to the target domain.
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ *   < 0 error
+ *   0   success
+ */
+int handle_device_interrupts(struct domain *d,
+                                           struct dt_device_node *dev,
+                                           bool need_mapping)
+{
+    unsigned int i, nirq;
+    int res;
+    struct dt_raw_irq rirq;
+
+    nirq = dt_number_of_irq(dev);
+
+    /* Give permission and map IRQs */
+    for ( i = 0; i < nirq; i++ )
+    {
+        res = dt_device_get_raw_irq(dev, i, &rirq);
+        if ( res )
+        {
+            printk(XENLOG_ERR "Unable to retrieve irq %u for %s\n",
+                   i, dt_node_full_name(dev));
+            return res;
+        }
+
+        /*
+         * Don't map IRQ that have no physical meaning
+         * ie: IRQ whose controller is not the GIC
+         */
+        if ( rirq.controller != dt_interrupt_controller )
+        {
+            dt_dprintk("irq %u not connected to primary controller. Connected to %s\n",
+                      i, dt_node_full_name(rirq.controller));
+            continue;
+        }
+
+        res = platform_get_irq(dev, i);
+        if ( res < 0 )
+        {
+            printk(XENLOG_ERR "Unable to get irq %u for %s\n",
+                   i, dt_node_full_name(dev));
+            return res;
+        }
+
+        res = map_irq_to_domain(d, res, need_mapping, dt_node_name(dev));
+        if ( res )
+            return res;
+    }
+
+    return 0;
+}
+
 /*
  * Local variables:
  * mode: C
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
index 0167731..3e8f6da 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
@@ -51,12 +51,6 @@ static int __init parse_dom0_mem(const char *s)
 }
 custom_param("dom0_mem", parse_dom0_mem);
 
-struct map_range_data
-{
-    struct domain *d;
-    p2m_type_t p2mt;
-};
-
 /* Override macros from asm/page.h to make them work with mfn_t */
 #undef virt_to_mfn
 #define virt_to_mfn(va) _mfn(__virt_to_mfn(va))
@@ -1624,41 +1618,6 @@ int __init make_chosen_node(const struct kernel_info *kinfo)
     return res;
 }
 
-int __init map_irq_to_domain(struct domain *d, unsigned int irq,
-                             bool need_mapping, const char *devname)
-{
-    int res;
-
-    res = irq_permit_access(d, irq);
-    if ( res )
-    {
-        printk(XENLOG_ERR "Unable to permit to dom%u access to IRQ %u\n",
-               d->domain_id, irq);
-        return res;
-    }
-
-    if ( need_mapping )
-    {
-        /*
-         * Checking the return of vgic_reserve_virq is not
-         * necessary. It should not fail except when we try to map
-         * the IRQ twice. This can legitimately happen if the IRQ is shared
-         */
-        vgic_reserve_virq(d, irq);
-
-        res = route_irq_to_guest(d, irq, irq, devname);
-        if ( res < 0 )
-        {
-            printk(XENLOG_ERR "Unable to map IRQ%"PRId32" to dom%d\n",
-                   irq, d->domain_id);
-            return res;
-        }
-    }
-
-    dt_dprintk("  - IRQ: %u\n", irq);
-    return 0;
-}
-
 static int __init map_dt_irq_to_domain(const struct dt_device_node *dev,
                                        const struct dt_irq *dt_irq,
                                        void *data)
@@ -1690,59 +1649,6 @@ static int __init map_dt_irq_to_domain(const struct dt_device_node *dev,
     return 0;
 }
 
-static int __init map_range_to_domain(const struct dt_device_node *dev,
-                                      u64 addr, u64 len,
-                                      void *data)
-{
-    struct map_range_data *mr_data = data;
-    struct domain *d = mr_data->d;
-    bool need_mapping = !dt_device_for_passthrough(dev);
-    int res;
-
-    /*
-     * reserved-memory regions are RAM carved out for a special purpose.
-     * They are not MMIO and therefore a domain should not be able to
-     * manage them via the IOMEM interface.
-     */
-    if ( strncasecmp(dt_node_full_name(dev), "/reserved-memory/",
-                     strlen("/reserved-memory/")) != 0 )
-    {
-        res = iomem_permit_access(d, paddr_to_pfn(addr),
-                paddr_to_pfn(PAGE_ALIGN(addr + len - 1)));
-        if ( res )
-        {
-            printk(XENLOG_ERR "Unable to permit to dom%d access to"
-                    " 0x%"PRIx64" - 0x%"PRIx64"\n",
-                    d->domain_id,
-                    addr & PAGE_MASK, PAGE_ALIGN(addr + len) - 1);
-            return res;
-        }
-    }
-
-    if ( need_mapping )
-    {
-        res = map_regions_p2mt(d,
-                               gaddr_to_gfn(addr),
-                               PFN_UP(len),
-                               maddr_to_mfn(addr),
-                               mr_data->p2mt);
-
-        if ( res < 0 )
-        {
-            printk(XENLOG_ERR "Unable to map 0x%"PRIx64
-                   " - 0x%"PRIx64" in domain %d\n",
-                   addr & PAGE_MASK, PAGE_ALIGN(addr + len) - 1,
-                   d->domain_id);
-            return res;
-        }
-    }
-
-    dt_dprintk("  - MMIO: %010"PRIx64" - %010"PRIx64" P2MType=%x\n",
-               addr, addr + len, mr_data->p2mt);
-
-    return 0;
-}
-
 /*
  * For a node which describes a discoverable bus (such as a PCI bus)
  * then we may need to perform additional mappings in order to make
@@ -1773,62 +1679,6 @@ static int __init map_device_children(struct domain *d,
 }
 
 /*
- * handle_device_interrupts retrieves the interrupts configuration from
- * a device tree node and maps those interrupts to the target domain.
- *
- * Returns:
- *   < 0 error
- *   0   success
- */
-static int __init handle_device_interrupts(struct domain *d,
-                                           struct dt_device_node *dev,
-                                           bool need_mapping)
-{
-    unsigned int i, nirq;
-    int res;
-    struct dt_raw_irq rirq;
-
-    nirq = dt_number_of_irq(dev);
-
-    /* Give permission and map IRQs */
-    for ( i = 0; i < nirq; i++ )
-    {
-        res = dt_device_get_raw_irq(dev, i, &rirq);
-        if ( res )
-        {
-            printk(XENLOG_ERR "Unable to retrieve irq %u for %s\n",
-                   i, dt_node_full_name(dev));
-            return res;
-        }
-
-        /*
-         * Don't map IRQ that have no physical meaning
-         * ie: IRQ whose controller is not the GIC
-         */
-        if ( rirq.controller != dt_interrupt_controller )
-        {
-            dt_dprintk("irq %u not connected to primary controller. Connected to %s\n",
-                      i, dt_node_full_name(rirq.controller));
-            continue;
-        }
-
-        res = platform_get_irq(dev, i);
-        if ( res < 0 )
-        {
-            printk(XENLOG_ERR "Unable to get irq %u for %s\n",
-                   i, dt_node_full_name(dev));
-            return res;
-        }
-
-        res = map_irq_to_domain(d, res, need_mapping, dt_node_name(dev));
-        if ( res )
-            return res;
-    }
-
-    return 0;
-}
-
-/*
  * For a given device node:
  *  - Give permission to the guest to manage IRQ and MMIO range
  *  - Retrieve the IRQ configuration (i.e edge/level) from device tree
diff --git a/xen/common/device_tree.c b/xen/common/device_tree.c
index 92ce59e..88f3f7e 100644
--- a/xen/common/device_tree.c
+++ b/xen/common/device_tree.c
@@ -1821,12 +1821,12 @@ int dt_count_phandle_with_args(const struct dt_device_node *np,
  * @allnextpp: pointer to ->allnext from last allocated device_node
  * @fpsize: Size of the node path up at the current depth.
  */
-static unsigned long __init unflatten_dt_node(const void *fdt,
-                                              unsigned long mem,
-                                              unsigned long *p,
-                                              struct dt_device_node *dad,
-                                              struct dt_device_node ***allnextpp,
-                                              unsigned long fpsize)
+static unsigned long unflatten_dt_node(const void *fdt,
+                                unsigned long mem,
+                                unsigned long *p,
+                                struct dt_device_node *dad,
+                                struct dt_device_node ***allnextpp,
+                                unsigned long fpsize)
 {
     struct dt_device_node *np;
     struct dt_property *pp, **prev_pp = NULL;
@@ -2057,7 +2057,7 @@ static unsigned long __init unflatten_dt_node(const void *fdt,
 }
 
 /**
- * __unflatten_device_tree - create tree of device_nodes from flat blob
+ * unflatten_device_tree - create tree of device_nodes from flat blob
  *
  * unflattens a device-tree, creating the
  * tree of struct device_node. It also fills the "name" and "type"
@@ -2066,7 +2066,7 @@ static unsigned long __init unflatten_dt_node(const void *fdt,
  * @fdt: The fdt to expand
  * @mynodes: The device_node tree created by the call
  */
-static void __init __unflatten_device_tree(const void *fdt,
+void unflatten_device_tree(const void *fdt,
                                            struct dt_device_node **mynodes)
 {
     unsigned long start, mem, size;
@@ -2189,7 +2189,7 @@ dt_find_interrupt_controller(const struct dt_device_match *matches)
 
 void __init dt_unflatten_host_device_tree(void)
 {
-    __unflatten_device_tree(device_tree_flattened, &dt_host);
+    unflatten_device_tree(device_tree_flattened, &dt_host);
     dt_alias_scan();
 }
 
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain_build.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain_build.h
index 34ceddc..17449b1 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain_build.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain_build.h
@@ -4,10 +4,20 @@
 #include <xen/sched.h>
 #include <asm/kernel.h>
 
+struct map_range_data
+{
+    struct domain *d;
+    p2m_type_t p2mt;
+};
+
 int map_irq_to_domain(struct domain *d, unsigned int irq,
                       bool need_mapping, const char *devname);
 int make_chosen_node(const struct kernel_info *kinfo);
 void evtchn_allocate(struct domain *d);
+int handle_device_interrupts(struct domain *d, struct dt_device_node *dev,
+                             bool need_mapping);
+int map_range_to_domain(const struct dt_device_node *dev, u64 addr, u64 len,
+                        void *data);
 
 #ifndef CONFIG_ACPI
 static inline int prepare_acpi(struct domain *d, struct kernel_info *kinfo)
diff --git a/xen/include/xen/device_tree.h b/xen/include/xen/device_tree.h
index 573e4a0..9fc63ab 100644
--- a/xen/include/xen/device_tree.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/device_tree.h
@@ -177,6 +177,11 @@ int device_tree_for_each_node(const void *fdt, int node,
  */
 void dt_unflatten_host_device_tree(void);
 
+/*
+ * unflatten any device tree.
+ */
+void unflatten_device_tree(const void *fdt, struct dt_device_node **mynodes);
+
 /**
  * IRQ translation callback
  * TODO: For the moment we assume that we only have ONE
-- 
2.7.4



  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-09  7:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-09  7:02 [XEN][RFC PATCH v2 00/12] dynamic node programming using overlay dtbo Vikram Garhwal
2021-11-09  7:02 ` Vikram Garhwal [this message]
2021-11-09  7:02 ` [XEN][RFC PATCH v2 02/12] xen: arm: Add CONFIG_OVERLAY_DTB Vikram Garhwal
2021-12-22 14:02   ` Julien Grall
2021-11-09  7:02 ` [XEN][RFC PATCH v2 03/12] libfdt: Keep fdt functions after init for CONFIG_OVERLAY_DTB Vikram Garhwal
2021-11-09 11:10   ` Jan Beulich
2021-12-22 14:03   ` Julien Grall
2021-11-09  7:02 ` [XEN][RFC PATCH v2 04/12] libfdt: Add fdt_ prefix to overlay_get_target() Vikram Garhwal
2021-12-22 14:07   ` Julien Grall
2021-11-09  7:02 ` [XEN][RFC PATCH v2 05/12] device tree: Add _dt_find_node_by_path() to find nodes in device tree Vikram Garhwal
2021-11-09  7:02 ` [XEN][RFC PATCH v2 06/12] xen/smmu: Add remove_device callback for smmu_iommu ops Vikram Garhwal
2021-12-22 14:31   ` Julien Grall
2021-11-09  7:02 ` [XEN][RFC PATCH v2 07/12] " Vikram Garhwal
2021-12-22 14:38   ` Julien Grall
2021-11-09  7:02 ` [XEN][RFC PATCH v2 08/12] xen/arm: Implement device tree node removal functionalities Vikram Garhwal
2021-11-09 11:16   ` Jan Beulich
2021-12-22 16:13   ` Julien Grall
2021-12-24  0:45     ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-11-09  7:02 ` [XEN][RFC PATCH v2 09/12] xen/arm: Implement device tree node addition functionalities Vikram Garhwal
2021-11-09 11:19   ` Jan Beulich
2021-11-09 17:55     ` Vikram Garhwal
2021-11-09  7:02 ` [XEN][RFC PATCH v2 10/12] tools/libs/ctrl: Implement new xc interfaces for dt overlay Vikram Garhwal
2021-11-11 16:54   ` Anthony PERARD
2021-11-11 19:46     ` Vikram Garhwal
2021-11-12 14:21       ` Anthony PERARD
2021-11-09  7:02 ` [XEN][RFC PATCH v2 11/12] tools/libs/light: Implement new libxl functions for device tree overlay ops Vikram Garhwal
2021-11-11 16:44   ` Anthony PERARD
2021-11-09  7:02 ` [XEN][RFC PATCH v2 12/12] tools/xl: Add new xl command overlay Vikram Garhwal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1636441347-133850-2-git-send-email-fnu.vikram@xilinx.com \
    --to=fnu.vikram@xilinx.com \
    --cc=bertrand.marquis@arm.com \
    --cc=julien@xen.org \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=volodymyr_babchuk@epam.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).