xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: Vikram Garhwal <fnu.vikram@xilinx.com>
Cc: sstabellini@kernel.org, julien@xen.org, bertrand.marquis@arm.com,
	volodymyr_babchuk@epam.com,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>,
	Ian Jackson <iwj@xenproject.org>, Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [XEN][RFC PATCH v2 09/12] xen/arm: Implement device tree node addition functionalities
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 12:19:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a984eede-878f-d9b5-da63-990e2e2e57b5@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1636441347-133850-10-git-send-email-fnu.vikram@xilinx.com>

On 09.11.2021 08:02, Vikram Garhwal wrote:
> --- a/xen/common/sysctl.c
> +++ b/xen/common/sysctl.c
> @@ -331,6 +331,205 @@ out:
>      spin_unlock(&overlay_lock);
>      return rc;
>  }
> +
> +/*
> + * Adds device tree nodes under target node.
> + * We use dt_host_new to unflatten the updated device_tree_flattened. This is
> + * done to avoid the removal of device_tree generation, iomem regions mapping to
> + * hardware domain done by handle_node().
> + */
> +static long handle_add_overlay_nodes(void *overlay_fdt,
> +                                     uint32_t overlay_fdt_size)

You adding a static function here without any caller got me puzzled.
First I thought you'd be introducing a build failure this was, but
it's really patch 8 which does by introducing a call to this function
without the function actually being there.

Jan



  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-09 11:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-09  7:02 [XEN][RFC PATCH v2 00/12] dynamic node programming using overlay dtbo Vikram Garhwal
2021-11-09  7:02 ` [XEN][RFC PATCH v2 01/12] device tree: Remove __init from function type Vikram Garhwal
2021-11-09  7:02 ` [XEN][RFC PATCH v2 02/12] xen: arm: Add CONFIG_OVERLAY_DTB Vikram Garhwal
2021-12-22 14:02   ` Julien Grall
2021-11-09  7:02 ` [XEN][RFC PATCH v2 03/12] libfdt: Keep fdt functions after init for CONFIG_OVERLAY_DTB Vikram Garhwal
2021-11-09 11:10   ` Jan Beulich
2021-12-22 14:03   ` Julien Grall
2021-11-09  7:02 ` [XEN][RFC PATCH v2 04/12] libfdt: Add fdt_ prefix to overlay_get_target() Vikram Garhwal
2021-12-22 14:07   ` Julien Grall
2021-11-09  7:02 ` [XEN][RFC PATCH v2 05/12] device tree: Add _dt_find_node_by_path() to find nodes in device tree Vikram Garhwal
2021-11-09  7:02 ` [XEN][RFC PATCH v2 06/12] xen/smmu: Add remove_device callback for smmu_iommu ops Vikram Garhwal
2021-12-22 14:31   ` Julien Grall
2021-11-09  7:02 ` [XEN][RFC PATCH v2 07/12] " Vikram Garhwal
2021-12-22 14:38   ` Julien Grall
2021-11-09  7:02 ` [XEN][RFC PATCH v2 08/12] xen/arm: Implement device tree node removal functionalities Vikram Garhwal
2021-11-09 11:16   ` Jan Beulich
2021-12-22 16:13   ` Julien Grall
2021-12-24  0:45     ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-11-09  7:02 ` [XEN][RFC PATCH v2 09/12] xen/arm: Implement device tree node addition functionalities Vikram Garhwal
2021-11-09 11:19   ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2021-11-09 17:55     ` Vikram Garhwal
2021-11-09  7:02 ` [XEN][RFC PATCH v2 10/12] tools/libs/ctrl: Implement new xc interfaces for dt overlay Vikram Garhwal
2021-11-11 16:54   ` Anthony PERARD
2021-11-11 19:46     ` Vikram Garhwal
2021-11-12 14:21       ` Anthony PERARD
2021-11-09  7:02 ` [XEN][RFC PATCH v2 11/12] tools/libs/light: Implement new libxl functions for device tree overlay ops Vikram Garhwal
2021-11-11 16:44   ` Anthony PERARD
2021-11-09  7:02 ` [XEN][RFC PATCH v2 12/12] tools/xl: Add new xl command overlay Vikram Garhwal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a984eede-878f-d9b5-da63-990e2e2e57b5@suse.com \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=bertrand.marquis@arm.com \
    --cc=fnu.vikram@xilinx.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
    --cc=iwj@xenproject.org \
    --cc=julien@xen.org \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=volodymyr_babchuk@epam.com \
    --cc=wl@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).