From: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <JGross@suse.com>,
stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
cardoe@cardoe.com, pgnet.dev@gmail.com, ning.sun@intel.com,
david.vrabel@citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
qiaowei.ren@intel.com, richard.l.maliszewski@intel.com,
gang.wei@intel.com, fu.wei@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/16] efi: create efi_enabled()
Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 19:15:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160525171535.GM5490@olila.local.net-space.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57456E5702000078000EE897@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 01:20:23AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 15.04.16 at 14:33, <daniel.kiper@oracle.com> wrote:
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/efi/stub.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/efi/stub.c
> > @@ -4,11 +4,8 @@
> > #include <xen/lib.h>
> > #include <asm/page.h>
> >
> > -#ifndef efi_enabled
> > -const bool_t efi_enabled = 0;
> > -#endif
> > -
> > struct efi __read_mostly efi = {
> > + .flags = 0, /* Initialized later. */
>
> This is pointless to add - the field will get zero-initialized anyway.
Sure thing. However, I think that we should be clear here that
there is no default value for .flags (well, it is 0). Though if
you wish I can remove that.
> > --- a/xen/common/efi/boot.c
> > +++ b/xen/common/efi/boot.c
> > @@ -934,6 +934,10 @@ efi_start(EFI_HANDLE ImageHandle, EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE *SystemTable)
> > char *option_str;
> > bool_t use_cfg_file;
> >
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_ARM /* Disabled until runtime services implemented. */
> > + set_bit(EFI_PLATFORM, &efi.flags);
> > +#endif
>
> Surely this can be __set_bit()? It's also hard to see what setting this
OK.
> flag has got to do with runtime services. But more on this below.
Well, comment is not the best one here... I will fix it.
> > @@ -42,11 +38,12 @@ UINT64 __read_mostly efi_boot_remain_var_store_size;
> > UINT64 __read_mostly efi_boot_max_var_size;
> >
> > struct efi __read_mostly efi = {
> > - .acpi = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR,
> > - .acpi20 = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR,
> > - .mps = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR,
> > - .smbios = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR,
> > - .smbios3 = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR,
> > + .flags = 0, /* Initialized later. */
> > + .acpi = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR,
> > + .acpi20 = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR,
> > + .mps = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR,
> > + .smbios = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR,
> > + .smbios3 = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR
> > };
>
> This, again, is an unnecessary hunk. And in no case should you drop
Ditto.
> the trailing comma - that's there for a reason.
What is the reason for trailing comma?
> > --- a/xen/include/xen/efi.h
> > +++ b/xen/include/xen/efi.h
> > @@ -2,15 +2,17 @@
> > #define __XEN_EFI_H__
> >
> > #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> > +#include <xen/bitops.h>
> > #include <xen/types.h>
> > #endif
> >
> > -extern const bool_t efi_enabled;
> > -
> > #define EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR (~0UL)
> >
> > +#define EFI_PLATFORM 0
>
> So what does "platform" mean? Did you consider using the more fine
It means "EFI platform". It differentiates from "legacy BIOS platform".
> grained set of flags Linux uses nowadays? That would also eliminate
I wish to use just basic idea. However, I am not going to copy all
stuff from Linux. We do not need that.
> the odd connection to runtime services mentioned earlier.
That is good point. I will think how to solve that in good way.
> And please add a comment making clear that these values are bit
> positions to be used in the flags field below. I might also help to
> move this right next to the structure field.
OK.
Daniel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-25 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 94+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-15 12:33 [PATCH v3 00/16] x86: multiboot2 protocol support Daniel Kiper
2016-04-15 12:33 ` [PATCH v3 01/16] x86/boot: do not create unwind tables Daniel Kiper
2016-04-15 15:45 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-04-15 12:33 ` [PATCH v3 02/16] x86: zero BSS using stosl instead of stosb Daniel Kiper
2016-04-15 13:57 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-04-15 15:48 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-04-15 12:33 ` [PATCH v3 03/16] x86/boot: call reloc() using cdecl calling convention Daniel Kiper
2016-04-15 15:56 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-06-17 8:41 ` Daniel Kiper
2016-06-17 9:30 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-24 8:42 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-15 12:33 ` [PATCH v3 04/16] x86/boot/reloc: create generic alloc and copy functions Daniel Kiper
2016-04-15 12:33 ` [PATCH v3 05/16] x86/boot: use %ecx instead of %eax Daniel Kiper
2016-04-15 12:33 ` [PATCH v3 06/16] x86/boot/reloc: Rename some variables and rearrange code a bit Daniel Kiper
2016-04-15 12:33 ` [PATCH v3 07/16] x86/boot: create *.lnk files with linker script Daniel Kiper
2016-04-15 14:04 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-05-24 9:05 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-24 12:28 ` Daniel Kiper
2016-05-24 12:52 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-17 9:06 ` Daniel Kiper
2016-06-17 10:04 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-17 10:34 ` Daniel Kiper
2016-04-15 12:33 ` [PATCH v3 08/16] x86: add multiboot2 protocol support Daniel Kiper
2016-05-24 15:46 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-25 16:34 ` Daniel Kiper
2016-05-26 10:28 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-05-27 8:08 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-27 8:13 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-05-27 8:24 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-27 8:11 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-15 12:33 ` [PATCH v3 09/16] efi: explicitly define efi struct in xen/arch/x86/efi/stub.c Daniel Kiper
2016-05-25 7:03 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-25 16:45 ` Daniel Kiper
2016-05-27 8:16 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-01 15:07 ` Daniel Kiper
2016-07-05 18:33 ` Daniel Kiper
2016-07-06 6:55 ` Jan Beulich
2016-07-06 10:27 ` Daniel Kiper
2016-07-06 12:00 ` Jan Beulich
2016-07-06 12:55 ` Daniel Kiper
2016-04-15 12:33 ` [PATCH v3 10/16] efi: create efi_enabled() Daniel Kiper
2016-05-25 7:20 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-25 17:15 ` Daniel Kiper [this message]
2016-05-26 10:31 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-05-27 8:22 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-01 15:23 ` Daniel Kiper
2016-06-01 15:41 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-01 19:28 ` Daniel Kiper
2016-06-02 8:06 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-15 12:33 ` [PATCH v3 11/16] efi: build xen.gz with EFI code Daniel Kiper
2016-05-25 7:53 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-25 19:07 ` Daniel Kiper
2016-05-27 8:31 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-01 15:48 ` Daniel Kiper
2016-06-01 15:58 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-01 19:39 ` Daniel Kiper
2016-04-15 12:33 ` [PATCH v3 12/16 - RFC] x86/efi: create new early memory allocator Daniel Kiper
2016-05-25 8:39 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-25 19:48 ` Daniel Kiper
2016-05-27 8:37 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-01 15:58 ` Daniel Kiper
2016-06-01 16:02 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-01 19:53 ` Daniel Kiper
2016-06-02 8:11 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-02 10:43 ` Daniel Kiper
2016-06-02 11:10 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-01 16:01 ` Daniel Kiper
2016-07-05 18:26 ` Daniel Kiper
2016-07-06 7:22 ` Jan Beulich
2016-07-06 11:15 ` Daniel Kiper
2016-04-15 12:33 ` [PATCH v3 13/16 - RFC] x86: add multiboot2 protocol support for EFI platforms Daniel Kiper
2016-05-25 9:32 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-25 10:29 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-25 21:02 ` Daniel Kiper
2016-05-27 9:02 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-01 19:03 ` Daniel Kiper
2016-06-02 8:34 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-02 16:12 ` Daniel Kiper
2016-06-03 9:26 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-03 17:06 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-04-15 12:33 ` [PATCH v3 14/16] x86/boot: implement early command line parser in C Daniel Kiper
2016-05-25 10:33 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-25 21:36 ` Daniel Kiper
2016-05-27 9:33 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-02 8:15 ` Daniel Kiper
2016-06-02 8:39 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-15 12:33 ` [PATCH v3 15/16 - RFC] x86: make Xen early boot code relocatable Daniel Kiper
2016-05-25 10:48 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-15 12:33 ` [PATCH v3 16/16] x86: add multiboot2 protocol support for relocatable images Daniel Kiper
2016-05-25 11:03 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-01 13:35 ` Daniel Kiper
2016-06-01 14:44 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-01 19:16 ` Daniel Kiper
2016-06-02 8:41 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160525171535.GM5490@olila.local.net-space.pl \
--to=daniel.kiper@oracle.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=JGross@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=cardoe@cardoe.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=fu.wei@linaro.org \
--cc=gang.wei@intel.com \
--cc=ning.sun@intel.com \
--cc=pgnet.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=qiaowei.ren@intel.com \
--cc=richard.l.maliszewski@intel.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).