xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Cc: Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@citrix.com>,
	George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: 4.7 qemu regression: HVM guests fail to boot from xvda
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 15:34:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160601133408.GA8352@aepfle.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160601094852.GD5160@citrix.com>

On Wed, Jun 01, Wei Liu wrote:

> So I think the safest option now is to revert the said patch and figure
> out what to do next.

What did OSStest report when c0c099d got into the tree? Do these test
domU.cfg files contain vdev=hd instead of vdev=xvd, so the boot breakage
was not noticed?

What are the options we have to define a disk connected to an PIIX or
AHCI controller? I see xl.cfg has hdtype=. Is vdev hd vs. xvd really the
best way to describe a PV-only disk? It looks like the answer is yes.
hdtype= describes the controller variant, and vdev= the disk variant.

So in the end it needs to be documented properly that moving dom0 to
xen-4.7 requires adjustments to vdev= in domU.cfg (xvd -> hd), and that
this MAY have an impact for domU frontend drivers which use the vdev
string as is.
Namely this affects SLE11, SLE12, SLE12SP1, openSUSE up to Leap 42.1.
Upcoming releases use a pvops based kernel, so the device names are
fixed.
Konrad mentioned Solaris, no idea if its frontend driver uses the vdev
string. BSD should be checked as well.

Olaf

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-01 13:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-30 20:42 4.7 qemu regression: HVM guests fail to boot from xvda Olaf Hering
2016-05-31 11:02 ` George Dunlap
2016-05-31 11:16   ` Olaf Hering
2016-05-31 11:32     ` George Dunlap
2016-05-31 11:41       ` Olaf Hering
2016-05-31 12:00         ` George Dunlap
2016-05-31 12:04           ` Olaf Hering
2016-06-01 13:17             ` Olaf Hering
2016-06-01 21:40               ` Olaf Hering
2016-06-02 11:49                 ` Wei Liu
2016-06-02 12:06                   ` Olaf Hering
2016-05-31 12:15           ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-01  9:48           ` Wei Liu
2016-06-01 13:34             ` Olaf Hering [this message]
2016-06-01 14:11               ` Wei Liu
2016-06-01 14:32                 ` Olaf Hering
2016-06-01 15:36           ` Ian Jackson
2016-06-03 10:13             ` George Dunlap
2016-06-03 11:20               ` Olaf Hering
2016-06-03 11:27                 ` George Dunlap
2016-06-03 11:45                   ` Ian Jackson
2016-06-06 10:39                     ` George Dunlap
2016-06-06 10:52                       ` Ian Jackson
2016-06-06 11:43                         ` George Dunlap
2016-06-06 12:49                     ` George Dunlap
2016-06-07 14:08                     ` George Dunlap
2016-06-07 14:27                       ` Olaf Hering
2016-06-08 10:17                       ` Ian Jackson
2016-06-07 19:06                     ` Olaf Hering
2016-06-08 10:18                       ` Ian Jackson
2016-06-08 10:23                         ` George Dunlap
2016-06-08 10:30                           ` Ian Jackson
2016-06-08 10:49                             ` George Dunlap
2016-06-08 11:13                               ` Olaf Hering
2016-06-08 15:56                                 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-06-03 11:50                   ` Olaf Hering
2016-05-31 12:10       ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-31 13:41         ` George Dunlap
2016-05-31 14:10           ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-31 16:15     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-06-08 11:38 ` Wei Liu
2016-06-08 12:04   ` Olaf Hering
2016-06-08 12:09     ` Wei Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160601133408.GA8352@aepfle.de \
    --to=olaf@aepfle.de \
    --cc=anthony.perard@citrix.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).