xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: "Wei Liu" <wl@xen.org>, "Paul Durrant" <paul@xen.org>,
	"Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	"Ian Jackson" <Ian.Jackson@citrix.com>,
	"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/9] tests/cpu-policy: Confirm that CPUID serialisation is sorted
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 15:15:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200615141532.1927-3-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200615141532.1927-1-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>

The existing x86_cpuid_copy_to_buffer() does produce sorted results, and we're
about to start relying on this.  Extend the unit tests.

As test_cpuid_serialise_success() is a fairly limited set of synthetic
examples right now, introduce test_cpuid_current() to operate on the full
policy for the current CPU.

Tweak the fail() macro to allow for simplified control flow.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
---
CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
CC: Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>
CC: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
CC: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@citrix.com>
CC: Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>
CC: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>
---
 tools/tests/cpu-policy/test-cpu-policy.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/tests/cpu-policy/test-cpu-policy.c b/tools/tests/cpu-policy/test-cpu-policy.c
index fe8cdf6ea9..7ba9707236 100644
--- a/tools/tests/cpu-policy/test-cpu-policy.c
+++ b/tools/tests/cpu-policy/test-cpu-policy.c
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ static unsigned int nr_failures;
 #define fail(fmt, ...)                          \
 ({                                              \
     nr_failures++;                              \
-    printf(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);                 \
+    (void)printf(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);           \
 })
 
 #define memdup(ptr)                             \
@@ -66,6 +66,45 @@ static void test_vendor_identification(void)
     }
 }
 
+static bool leaves_are_sorted(const xen_cpuid_leaf_t *leaves, unsigned int nr)
+{
+    for ( unsigned int i = 1; i < nr; ++i )
+    {
+        /* leaf index went backwards => not sorted. */
+        if ( leaves[i - 1].leaf > leaves[i].leaf )
+            return false;
+
+        /* leaf index went forwards => ok */
+        if ( leaves[i - 1].leaf < leaves[i].leaf )
+            continue;
+
+        /* leave index the same, subleaf didn't increase => not sorted. */
+        if ( leaves[i - 1].subleaf >= leaves[i].subleaf )
+            return false;
+    }
+
+    return true;
+}
+
+static void test_cpuid_current(void)
+{
+    struct cpuid_policy p;
+    xen_cpuid_leaf_t leaves[CPUID_MAX_SERIALISED_LEAVES];
+    unsigned int nr = ARRAY_SIZE(leaves);
+    int rc;
+
+    printf("Testing CPUID on current CPU\n");
+
+    x86_cpuid_policy_fill_native(&p);
+
+    rc = x86_cpuid_copy_to_buffer(&p, leaves, &nr);
+    if ( rc != 0 )
+        return fail("  Serialise, expected rc 0, got %d\n", rc);
+
+    if ( !leaves_are_sorted(leaves, nr) )
+        return fail("  Leaves not sorted\n");
+}
+
 static void test_cpuid_serialise_success(void)
 {
     static const struct test {
@@ -178,6 +217,13 @@ static void test_cpuid_serialise_success(void)
             goto test_done;
         }
 
+        if ( !leaves_are_sorted(leaves, nr) )
+        {
+            fail("  Test %s, leaves not sorted\n",
+                 t->name);
+            goto test_done;
+        }
+
     test_done:
         free(leaves);
     }
@@ -613,6 +659,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 
     test_vendor_identification();
 
+    test_cpuid_current();
     test_cpuid_serialise_success();
     test_cpuid_deserialise_failure();
     test_cpuid_out_of_range_clearing();
-- 
2.11.0



  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-15 14:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-15 14:15 [PATCH for-4.14 0/9] XSA-320 follow for IvyBridge Andrew Cooper
2020-06-15 14:15 ` [PATCH 1/9] tools/libx[cl]: Introduce struct xc_xend_cpuid for xc_cpuid_set() Andrew Cooper
2020-06-15 14:51   ` Ian Jackson
2020-06-15 14:15 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2020-06-15 14:52   ` [PATCH 2/9] tests/cpu-policy: Confirm that CPUID serialisation is sorted Ian Jackson
2020-06-15 15:00     ` Andrew Cooper
2020-06-15 15:34       ` Ian Jackson
2020-06-15 16:12         ` Andrew Cooper
2020-06-16  6:51           ` Jan Beulich
2020-06-16  9:01   ` Jan Beulich
2020-06-15 14:15 ` [PATCH 3/9] tools/libx[cl]: Move processing loop down into xc_cpuid_set() Andrew Cooper
2020-06-15 14:54   ` Ian Jackson
2020-06-16  9:16   ` Jan Beulich
2020-06-16 15:58     ` Andrew Cooper
2020-06-15 14:15 ` [PATCH 4/9] tools/libx[cl]: Merge xc_cpuid_set() into xc_cpuid_apply_policy() Andrew Cooper
2020-06-15 14:55   ` Ian Jackson
2020-06-15 14:15 ` [PATCH 5/9] tools/libx[cl]: Plumb bool restore down " Andrew Cooper
2020-06-15 14:55   ` Ian Jackson
2020-06-15 14:15 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86/gen-cpuid: Distinguish default vs max in feature annotations Andrew Cooper
2020-06-15 14:15 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/hvm: Disable MPX by default Andrew Cooper
2020-06-16  9:33   ` Jan Beulich
2020-06-16 16:15     ` Andrew Cooper
2020-06-17 10:32       ` Jan Beulich
2020-06-17 11:16         ` Andrew Cooper
2020-06-17 11:24           ` Jan Beulich
2020-06-17 11:28             ` Andrew Cooper
2020-06-17 11:41               ` Jan Beulich
2020-06-17 11:47                 ` Andrew Cooper
2020-06-15 14:15 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86/cpuid: Introduce missing feature adjustment in calculate_pv_def_policy() Andrew Cooper
2020-06-16  9:40   ` Jan Beulich
2020-06-16 16:17     ` Andrew Cooper
2020-06-15 14:15 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86/spec-ctrl: Hide RDRAND by default on IvyBridge Andrew Cooper
2020-06-16 10:00   ` Jan Beulich
2020-06-16 16:26     ` Andrew Cooper
2020-06-17 10:39       ` Jan Beulich
2020-06-17 11:21         ` Andrew Cooper
2020-06-15 17:04 ` [PATCH for-4.14 0/9] XSA-320 follow for IvyBridge Paul Durrant
2020-06-17 12:46   ` Paul Durrant
2020-06-18  7:18 ` Jan Beulich
2020-06-18  9:37   ` Andrew Cooper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200615141532.1927-3-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Jackson@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=paul@xen.org \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=wl@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).