xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <andr2000@gmail.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: julien@xen.org, sstabellini@kernel.org,
	oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com, volodymyr_babchuk@epam.com,
	artem_mygaiev@epam.com, roger.pau@citrix.com, jbeulich@suse.com,
	andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, george.dunlap@citrix.com,
	paul@xen.org, bertrand.marquis@arm.com, rahul.singh@arm.com,
	Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 07/13] vpci/header: handle p2m range sets per BAR
Date: Fri,  4 Feb 2022 08:34:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220204063459.680961-8-andr2000@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220204063459.680961-1-andr2000@gmail.com>

From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>

Instead of handling a single range set, that contains all the memory
regions of all the BARs and ROM, have them per BAR.
As the range sets are now created when a PCI device is added and destroyed
when it is removed so make them named and accounted.

Note that rangesets were chosen here despite there being only up to
3 separate ranges in each set (typically just 1). But rangeset per BAR
was chosen for the ease of implementation and existing code re-usability.

This is in preparation of making non-identity mappings in p2m for the MMIOs.

Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>

---
Since v5:
- fix comments
- move rangeset allocation to init_bars and only allocate
  for MAPPABLE BARs
- check for overlap with the already setup BAR ranges
Since v4:
- use named range sets for BARs (Jan)
- changes required by the new locking scheme
- updated commit message (Jan)
Since v3:
- re-work vpci_cancel_pending accordingly to the per-BAR handling
- s/num_mem_ranges/map_pending and s/uint8_t/bool
- ASSERT(bar->mem) in modify_bars
- create and destroy the rangesets on add/remove
---
 xen/drivers/vpci/header.c | 213 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c   |  17 ++-
 xen/include/xen/vpci.h    |   4 +-
 3 files changed, 177 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c b/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c
index 2620a95ff35b..0c94504b87d8 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c
@@ -131,50 +131,85 @@ static void modify_decoding(const struct pci_dev *pdev, uint16_t cmd,
 
 bool vpci_process_pending(struct vcpu *v)
 {
-    if ( v->vpci.mem )
+    struct pci_dev *pdev = v->vpci.pdev;
+
+    if ( !pdev )
+        return false;
+
+    spin_lock(&pdev->vpci_lock);
+    if ( v->vpci.map_pending )
     {
         struct map_data data = {
             .d = v->domain,
             .map = v->vpci.cmd & PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY,
         };
-        int rc = rangeset_consume_ranges(v->vpci.mem, map_range, &data);
+        struct vpci_header *header = &pdev->vpci->header;
+        unsigned int i;
+
+        for ( i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(header->bars); i++ )
+        {
+            struct vpci_bar *bar = &header->bars[i];
+            int rc;
+
+            if ( rangeset_is_empty(bar->mem) )
+                continue;
 
-        if ( rc == -ERESTART )
-            return true;
+            rc = rangeset_consume_ranges(bar->mem, map_range, &data);
+
+            if ( rc == -ERESTART )
+            {
+                spin_unlock(&pdev->vpci_lock);
+                return true;
+            }
 
-        spin_lock(&v->vpci.pdev->vpci_lock);
-        if ( v->vpci.pdev->vpci )
             /* Disable memory decoding unconditionally on failure. */
-            modify_decoding(v->vpci.pdev,
-                            rc ? v->vpci.cmd & ~PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY : v->vpci.cmd,
-                            !rc && v->vpci.rom_only);
-        spin_unlock(&v->vpci.pdev->vpci_lock);
+            modify_decoding(pdev, rc ? v->vpci.cmd & ~PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY :
+                                       v->vpci.cmd, !rc && v->vpci.rom_only);
+
+            if ( rc )
+            {
+                /*
+                 * FIXME: in case of failure remove the device from the domain.
+                 * Note that there might still be leftover mappings. While this
+                 * is safe for Dom0, for DomUs the domain needs to be killed in
+                 * order to avoid leaking stale p2m mappings on failure.
+                 */
+                if ( is_hardware_domain(v->domain) )
+                    vpci_remove_device_locked(pdev);
+                else
+                    domain_crash(v->domain);
+
+                break;
+            }
+        }
+
+        v->vpci.map_pending = false;
 
-        rangeset_destroy(v->vpci.mem);
-        v->vpci.mem = NULL;
-        if ( rc )
-            /*
-             * FIXME: in case of failure remove the device from the domain.
-             * Note that there might still be leftover mappings. While this is
-             * safe for Dom0, for DomUs the domain will likely need to be
-             * killed in order to avoid leaking stale p2m mappings on
-             * failure.
-             */
-            vpci_remove_device(v->vpci.pdev);
     }
+    spin_unlock(&pdev->vpci_lock);
 
     return false;
 }
 
 static int __init apply_map(struct domain *d, const struct pci_dev *pdev,
-                            struct rangeset *mem, uint16_t cmd)
+                            uint16_t cmd)
 {
     struct map_data data = { .d = d, .map = true };
-    int rc;
+    struct vpci_header *header = &pdev->vpci->header;
+    int rc = 0;
+    unsigned int i;
+
+    for ( i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(header->bars); i++ )
+    {
+        struct vpci_bar *bar = &header->bars[i];
 
-    while ( (rc = rangeset_consume_ranges(mem, map_range, &data)) == -ERESTART )
-        process_pending_softirqs();
-    rangeset_destroy(mem);
+        if ( rangeset_is_empty(bar->mem) )
+            continue;
+
+        while ( (rc = rangeset_consume_ranges(bar->mem, map_range,
+                                              &data)) == -ERESTART )
+            process_pending_softirqs();
+    }
     if ( !rc )
         modify_decoding(pdev, cmd, false);
 
@@ -182,7 +217,7 @@ static int __init apply_map(struct domain *d, const struct pci_dev *pdev,
 }
 
 static void defer_map(struct domain *d, struct pci_dev *pdev,
-                      struct rangeset *mem, uint16_t cmd, bool rom_only)
+                      uint16_t cmd, bool rom_only)
 {
     struct vcpu *curr = current;
 
@@ -193,7 +228,7 @@ static void defer_map(struct domain *d, struct pci_dev *pdev,
      * started for the same device if the domain is not well-behaved.
      */
     curr->vpci.pdev = pdev;
-    curr->vpci.mem = mem;
+    curr->vpci.map_pending = true;
     curr->vpci.cmd = cmd;
     curr->vpci.rom_only = rom_only;
     /*
@@ -207,42 +242,60 @@ static void defer_map(struct domain *d, struct pci_dev *pdev,
 static int modify_bars(const struct pci_dev *pdev, uint16_t cmd, bool rom_only)
 {
     struct vpci_header *header = &pdev->vpci->header;
-    struct rangeset *mem = rangeset_new(NULL, NULL, 0);
     struct pci_dev *tmp, *dev = NULL;
     const struct vpci_msix *msix = pdev->vpci->msix;
-    unsigned int i;
+    unsigned int i, j;
     int rc;
-
-    if ( !mem )
-        return -ENOMEM;
+    bool map_pending;
 
     /*
-     * Create a rangeset that represents the current device BARs memory region
-     * and compare it against all the currently active BAR memory regions. If
-     * an overlap is found, subtract it from the region to be mapped/unmapped.
+     * Create a rangeset per BAR that represents the current device memory
+     * region and compare it against all the currently active BAR memory
+     * regions. If an overlap is found, subtract it from the region to be
+     * mapped/unmapped.
      *
-     * First fill the rangeset with all the BARs of this device or with the ROM
+     * First fill the rangesets with the BARs of this device or with the ROM
      * BAR only, depending on whether the guest is toggling the memory decode
      * bit of the command register, or the enable bit of the ROM BAR register.
      */
     for ( i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(header->bars); i++ )
     {
-        const struct vpci_bar *bar = &header->bars[i];
+        struct vpci_bar *bar = &header->bars[i];
         unsigned long start = PFN_DOWN(bar->addr);
         unsigned long end = PFN_DOWN(bar->addr + bar->size - 1);
 
+        if ( !bar->mem )
+            continue;
+
         if ( !MAPPABLE_BAR(bar) ||
              (rom_only ? bar->type != VPCI_BAR_ROM
                        : (bar->type == VPCI_BAR_ROM && !header->rom_enabled)) )
             continue;
 
-        rc = rangeset_add_range(mem, start, end);
+        rc = rangeset_add_range(bar->mem, start, end);
         if ( rc )
         {
             printk(XENLOG_G_WARNING "Failed to add [%lx, %lx]: %d\n",
                    start, end, rc);
-            rangeset_destroy(mem);
-            return rc;
+            goto fail;
+        }
+
+        /* Check for overlap with the already setup BAR ranges. */
+        for ( j = 0; j < i; j++ )
+        {
+            struct vpci_bar *bar = &header->bars[j];
+
+            if ( rangeset_is_empty(bar->mem) )
+                continue;
+
+            rc = rangeset_remove_range(bar->mem, start, end);
+            if ( rc )
+            {
+                printk(XENLOG_G_WARNING
+                       "Failed to remove overlapping range [%lx, %lx]: %d\n",
+                       start, end, rc);
+                goto fail;
+            }
         }
     }
 
@@ -253,14 +306,21 @@ static int modify_bars(const struct pci_dev *pdev, uint16_t cmd, bool rom_only)
         unsigned long end = PFN_DOWN(vmsix_table_addr(pdev->vpci, i) +
                                      vmsix_table_size(pdev->vpci, i) - 1);
 
-        rc = rangeset_remove_range(mem, start, end);
-        if ( rc )
+        for ( j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(header->bars); j++ )
         {
-            printk(XENLOG_G_WARNING
-                   "Failed to remove MSIX table [%lx, %lx]: %d\n",
-                   start, end, rc);
-            rangeset_destroy(mem);
-            return rc;
+            const struct vpci_bar *bar = &header->bars[j];
+
+            if ( rangeset_is_empty(bar->mem) )
+                continue;
+
+            rc = rangeset_remove_range(bar->mem, start, end);
+            if ( rc )
+            {
+                printk(XENLOG_G_WARNING
+                       "Failed to remove MSIX table [%lx, %lx]: %d\n",
+                       start, end, rc);
+                goto fail;
+            }
         }
     }
 
@@ -298,7 +358,8 @@ static int modify_bars(const struct pci_dev *pdev, uint16_t cmd, bool rom_only)
             unsigned long start = PFN_DOWN(bar->addr);
             unsigned long end = PFN_DOWN(bar->addr + bar->size - 1);
 
-            if ( !bar->enabled || !rangeset_overlaps_range(mem, start, end) ||
+            if ( !bar->enabled ||
+                 !rangeset_overlaps_range(bar->mem, start, end) ||
                  /*
                   * If only the ROM enable bit is toggled check against other
                   * BARs in the same device for overlaps, but not against the
@@ -307,14 +368,13 @@ static int modify_bars(const struct pci_dev *pdev, uint16_t cmd, bool rom_only)
                  (rom_only && tmp == pdev && bar->type == VPCI_BAR_ROM) )
                 continue;
 
-            rc = rangeset_remove_range(mem, start, end);
+            rc = rangeset_remove_range(bar->mem, start, end);
             if ( rc )
             {
                 spin_unlock(&tmp->vpci_lock);
                 printk(XENLOG_G_WARNING "Failed to remove [%lx, %lx]: %d\n",
                        start, end, rc);
-                rangeset_destroy(mem);
-                return rc;
+                goto fail;
             }
         }
         spin_unlock(&tmp->vpci_lock);
@@ -333,12 +393,28 @@ static int modify_bars(const struct pci_dev *pdev, uint16_t cmd, bool rom_only)
          * will always be to establish mappings and process all the BARs.
          */
         ASSERT((cmd & PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY) && !rom_only);
-        return apply_map(pdev->domain, pdev, mem, cmd);
+        return apply_map(pdev->domain, pdev, cmd);
     }
 
-    defer_map(dev->domain, dev, mem, cmd, rom_only);
+    /* Find out how many memory ranges has left after MSI and overlaps. */
+    map_pending = false;
+    for ( i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(header->bars); i++ )
+        if ( !rangeset_is_empty(header->bars[i].mem) )
+        {
+            map_pending = true;
+            break;
+        }
+
+    /* If there's no mapping work write the command register now. */
+    if ( !map_pending )
+        pci_conf_write16(pdev->sbdf, PCI_COMMAND, cmd);
+    else
+        defer_map(dev->domain, dev, cmd, rom_only);
 
     return 0;
+
+fail:
+    return rc;
 }
 
 static void cmd_write(const struct pci_dev *pdev, unsigned int reg,
@@ -529,6 +605,19 @@ static void rom_write(const struct pci_dev *pdev, unsigned int reg,
         rom->addr = val & PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_MASK;
 }
 
+static int bar_add_rangeset(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct vpci_bar *bar, int i)
+{
+    char str[32];
+
+    snprintf(str, sizeof(str), "%pp:BAR%d", &pdev->sbdf, i);
+
+    bar->mem = rangeset_new(pdev->domain, str, RANGESETF_no_print);
+    if ( !bar->mem )
+        return -ENOMEM;
+
+    return 0;
+}
+
 static int init_bars(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 {
     uint16_t cmd;
@@ -607,6 +696,13 @@ static int init_bars(struct pci_dev *pdev)
         else
             bars[i].type = VPCI_BAR_MEM32;
 
+        rc = bar_add_rangeset(pdev, &bars[i], i);
+        if ( rc )
+        {
+            bars[i].type = VPCI_BAR_EMPTY;
+            return rc;
+        }
+
         rc = pci_size_mem_bar(pdev->sbdf, reg, &addr, &size,
                               (i == num_bars - 1) ? PCI_BAR_LAST : 0);
         if ( rc < 0 )
@@ -659,6 +755,15 @@ static int init_bars(struct pci_dev *pdev)
                                    rom_reg, 4, rom);
             if ( rc )
                 rom->type = VPCI_BAR_EMPTY;
+            else
+            {
+                rc = bar_add_rangeset(pdev, rom, i);
+                if ( rc )
+                {
+                    rom->type = VPCI_BAR_EMPTY;
+                    return rc;
+                }
+            }
         }
     }
     else
diff --git a/xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c b/xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c
index 4e774875fa04..3177f13c1c22 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c
@@ -35,8 +35,11 @@ extern vpci_register_init_t *const __start_vpci_array[];
 extern vpci_register_init_t *const __end_vpci_array[];
 #define NUM_VPCI_INIT (__end_vpci_array - __start_vpci_array)
 
-static void vpci_remove_device_locked(struct pci_dev *pdev)
+void vpci_remove_device_locked(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 {
+    struct vpci_header *header = &pdev->vpci->header;
+    unsigned int i;
+
     ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&pdev->vpci_lock));
 
     while ( !list_empty(&pdev->vpci->handlers) )
@@ -48,6 +51,10 @@ static void vpci_remove_device_locked(struct pci_dev *pdev)
         list_del(&r->node);
         xfree(r);
     }
+
+    for ( i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(header->bars); i++ )
+        rangeset_destroy(header->bars[i].mem);
+
     xfree(pdev->vpci->msix);
     xfree(pdev->vpci->msi);
     xfree(pdev->vpci);
@@ -94,9 +101,15 @@ int vpci_add_handlers(struct pci_dev *pdev)
     }
 
     if ( rc )
-        vpci_remove_device_locked(pdev);
+        goto fail;
+
     spin_unlock(&pdev->vpci_lock);
 
+    return 0;
+
+ fail:
+    vpci_remove_device_locked(pdev);
+    spin_unlock(&pdev->vpci_lock);
     return rc;
 }
 
diff --git a/xen/include/xen/vpci.h b/xen/include/xen/vpci.h
index 270d22b85653..f1f49db959c7 100644
--- a/xen/include/xen/vpci.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/vpci.h
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ int __must_check vpci_add_handlers(struct pci_dev *dev);
 
 /* Remove all handlers and free vpci related structures. */
 void vpci_remove_device(struct pci_dev *pdev);
+void vpci_remove_device_locked(struct pci_dev *pdev);
 
 /* Add/remove a register handler. Must be called holding the vpci_lock. */
 int __must_check vpci_add_register(struct vpci *vpci,
@@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ struct vpci {
             /* Guest view of the BAR: address and lower bits. */
             uint64_t guest_reg;
             uint64_t size;
+            struct rangeset *mem;
             enum {
                 VPCI_BAR_EMPTY,
                 VPCI_BAR_IO,
@@ -143,9 +145,9 @@ struct vpci {
 
 struct vpci_vcpu {
     /* Per-vcpu structure to store state while {un}mapping of PCI BARs. */
-    struct rangeset *mem;
     struct pci_dev *pdev;
     uint16_t cmd;
+    bool map_pending : 1;
     bool rom_only : 1;
 };
 
-- 
2.25.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-04  6:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 138+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-04  6:34 [PATCH v6 00/13] PCI devices passthrough on Arm, part 3 Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-04  6:34 ` [PATCH v6 01/13] xen/pci: arm: add stub for is_memory_hole Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-04  8:51   ` Julien Grall
2022-02-04  9:01     ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-04  9:41       ` Julien Grall
2022-02-04  9:47         ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-04  9:57           ` Julien Grall
2022-02-04 10:35             ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-04 11:00               ` Julien Grall
2022-02-04 11:25                 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-04  6:34 ` [PATCH v6 02/13] rangeset: add RANGESETF_no_print flag Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-04  6:34 ` [PATCH v6 03/13] vpci: move lock outside of struct vpci Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-04  7:52   ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-04  8:13     ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-04  8:36       ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-04  8:58     ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-04  9:15       ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-04 10:12         ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-04 10:49           ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-04 11:13             ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-02-04 11:37               ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-04 12:37                 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-04 12:47                   ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-04 12:53                     ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-04 13:03                       ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-04 13:06                       ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-02-04 14:43                         ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-04 14:57                           ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-02-07 11:08                             ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-07 12:34                               ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-07 12:57                                 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-07 13:02                                   ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-07 12:46                               ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-02-07 13:53                                 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-07 14:11                                   ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-07 14:27                                     ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-02-07 14:33                                       ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-07 14:35                                       ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-07 15:11                                         ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-07 15:26                                           ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-07 16:07                                             ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-07 16:15                                               ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-07 16:21                                                 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-07 16:37                                                   ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-07 16:44                                                     ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-08  7:35                                                       ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-08  8:57                                                         ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-08  9:03                                                           ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-08 10:50                                                         ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-02-08 11:13                                                           ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-08 13:38                                                             ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-02-08 13:52                                                               ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-08  8:53                                                       ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-08  9:00                                                         ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-08 10:11                                                     ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-02-08 10:32                                                       ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-07 16:08                                             ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-02-07 16:12                                               ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-07 14:28                                     ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-07 14:19                                   ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-02-07 14:27                                     ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-04 11:37               ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-04 12:15                 ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-02-04 10:57           ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-02-04  6:34 ` [PATCH v6 04/13] vpci: restrict unhandled read/write operations for guests Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-04 14:11   ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-04 14:24     ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-08  8:00       ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-08  9:04         ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-08  9:09           ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-08  9:05         ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-02-08  9:10           ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-04  6:34 ` [PATCH v6 05/13] vpci: add hooks for PCI device assign/de-assign Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-07 16:28   ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-08  8:32     ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-08  9:13       ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-08  9:27         ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-08  9:44           ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-08  9:55             ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-08 10:09               ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-08 10:22                 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-08 10:29                   ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-08 10:52                     ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-08 11:00                       ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-08 11:25                         ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-10  8:21                           ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-10  9:22                             ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-10  9:33                               ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-04  6:34 ` [PATCH v6 06/13] vpci/header: implement guest BAR register handlers Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-07 17:06   ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-08  8:06     ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-08  9:16       ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-08  9:29         ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-02-08  9:25   ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-02-08  9:31     ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-08  9:48       ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-08  9:57         ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-08 10:15           ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-08 10:29             ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-08 13:58               ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-02-04  6:34 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko [this message]
2022-02-04  6:34 ` [PATCH v6 08/13] vpci/header: program p2m with guest BAR view Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-04  6:34 ` [PATCH v6 09/13] vpci/header: emulate PCI_COMMAND register for guests Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-04 14:25   ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-08  8:13     ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-08  9:33       ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-08  9:38         ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-08  9:52           ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-08  9:58             ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-08 11:11               ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-02-08 11:29                 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-08 14:09                   ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-02-08 14:13                     ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-04  6:34 ` [PATCH v6 10/13] vpci/header: reset the command register when adding devices Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-04 14:30   ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-04 14:37     ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-07  7:29       ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-07 11:27         ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-07 12:38           ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-07 12:51             ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-07 12:54               ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-07 14:17                 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-07 14:31                   ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-07 14:46                     ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-07 15:05                       ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-07 15:14                         ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-07 15:28                           ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-07 15:59                             ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-10 12:54                     ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-10 13:36                       ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-10 13:56                         ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-10 12:59                     ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-04  6:34 ` [PATCH v6 11/13] vpci: add initial support for virtual PCI bus topology Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-04  6:34 ` [PATCH v6 12/13] xen/arm: translate virtual PCI bus topology for guests Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-04  7:56   ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-04  8:18     ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-04  6:34 ` [PATCH v6 13/13] xen/arm: account IO handlers for emulated PCI MSI-X Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2022-02-11 15:28   ` Julien Grall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220204063459.680961-8-andr2000@gmail.com \
    --to=andr2000@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=artem_mygaiev@epam.com \
    --cc=bertrand.marquis@arm.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=julien@xen.org \
    --cc=oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com \
    --cc=oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com \
    --cc=paul@xen.org \
    --cc=rahul.singh@arm.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=volodymyr_babchuk@epam.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).