xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Use need_resched() instead of should_resched()
       [not found] <20150715095201.12246.49283.stgit@buzz>
@ 2015-07-15  9:52 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
  2015-07-15  9:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] sched/preempt: fix cond_resched_lock() and cond_resched_softirq() Konstantin Khlebnikov
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Konstantin Khlebnikov @ 2015-07-15  9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Zijlstra
  Cc: linux-arch, x86, linux-kernel, kvm-ppc, Alexander Graf,
	Paul Mackerras, David Vrabel, xen-devel, Boris Ostrovsky,
	linuxppc-dev

Function should_resched() is equal to (!preempt_count() && need_resched()).
In preemptive kernel preempt_count here is non-zero because of vc->lock.

Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
---
 arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
index 68d067ad4222..a9f753fb73a8 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
@@ -2178,7 +2178,7 @@ static int kvmppc_run_vcpu(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		vc->runner = vcpu;
 		if (n_ceded == vc->n_runnable) {
 			kvmppc_vcore_blocked(vc);
-		} else if (should_resched()) {
+		} else if (need_resched()) {
 			vc->vcore_state = VCORE_PREEMPT;
 			/* Let something else run */
 			cond_resched_lock(&vc->lock);

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 3/3] sched/preempt: fix cond_resched_lock() and cond_resched_softirq()
       [not found] <20150715095201.12246.49283.stgit@buzz>
  2015-07-15  9:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Use need_resched() instead of should_resched() Konstantin Khlebnikov
@ 2015-07-15  9:52 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
       [not found] ` <20150715095204.12246.98268.stgit@buzz>
  2015-07-20 13:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] drivers/xen/preempt: use need_resched() instead of should_resched() David Vrabel
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Konstantin Khlebnikov @ 2015-07-15  9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Zijlstra
  Cc: linux-arch, x86, linux-kernel, kvm-ppc, Alexander Graf,
	Paul Mackerras, David Vrabel, xen-devel, Boris Ostrovsky,
	linuxppc-dev

These functions check should_resched() before unlocking spinlock/bh-enable:
preempt_count always non-zero => should_resched() always returns false.
cond_resched_lock() worked iff spin_needbreak is set.

This patch adds argument "preempt_offset" to should_resched().

preempt_count offset constants for that:

PREEMPT_DISABLE_OFFSET  - offset after preempt_disable()
PREEMPT_LOCK_OFFSET     - offset after spin_lock()
SOFTIRQ_DISABLE_OFFSET  - offset after local_bh_distable()
SOFTIRQ_LOCK_OFFSET     - offset after spin_lock_bh()

Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h |    4 ++--
 include/asm-generic/preempt.h  |    5 +++--
 include/linux/preempt.h        |   19 ++++++++++++++-----
 include/linux/sched.h          |    6 ------
 kernel/sched/core.c            |    6 +++---
 5 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
index dca71714f860..b12f81022a6b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
@@ -90,9 +90,9 @@ static __always_inline bool __preempt_count_dec_and_test(void)
 /*
  * Returns true when we need to resched and can (barring IRQ state).
  */
-static __always_inline bool should_resched(void)
+static __always_inline bool should_resched(int preempt_offset)
 {
-	return unlikely(!raw_cpu_read_4(__preempt_count));
+	return unlikely(raw_cpu_read_4(__preempt_count) == preempt_offset);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/preempt.h b/include/asm-generic/preempt.h
index d0a7a4753db2..0bec580a4885 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/preempt.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/preempt.h
@@ -71,9 +71,10 @@ static __always_inline bool __preempt_count_dec_and_test(void)
 /*
  * Returns true when we need to resched and can (barring IRQ state).
  */
-static __always_inline bool should_resched(void)
+static __always_inline bool should_resched(int preempt_offset)
 {
-	return unlikely(!preempt_count() && tif_need_resched());
+	return unlikely(preempt_count() == preempt_offset &&
+			tif_need_resched());
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
diff --git a/include/linux/preempt.h b/include/linux/preempt.h
index 84991f185173..bea8dd8ff5e0 100644
--- a/include/linux/preempt.h
+++ b/include/linux/preempt.h
@@ -84,13 +84,21 @@
  */
 #define in_nmi()	(preempt_count() & NMI_MASK)
 
+/*
+ * The preempt_count offset after preempt_disable();
+ */
 #if defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT)
-# define PREEMPT_DISABLE_OFFSET 1
+# define PREEMPT_DISABLE_OFFSET	PREEMPT_OFFSET
 #else
-# define PREEMPT_DISABLE_OFFSET 0
+# define PREEMPT_DISABLE_OFFSET	0
 #endif
 
 /*
+ * The preempt_count offset after spin_lock()
+ */
+#define PREEMPT_LOCK_OFFSET	PREEMPT_DISABLE_OFFSET
+
+/*
  * The preempt_count offset needed for things like:
  *
  *  spin_lock_bh()
@@ -103,7 +111,7 @@
  *
  * Work as expected.
  */
-#define SOFTIRQ_LOCK_OFFSET (SOFTIRQ_DISABLE_OFFSET + PREEMPT_DISABLE_OFFSET)
+#define SOFTIRQ_LOCK_OFFSET (SOFTIRQ_DISABLE_OFFSET + PREEMPT_LOCK_OFFSET)
 
 /*
  * Are we running in atomic context?  WARNING: this macro cannot
@@ -124,7 +132,8 @@
 #if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER)
 extern void preempt_count_add(int val);
 extern void preempt_count_sub(int val);
-#define preempt_count_dec_and_test() ({ preempt_count_sub(1); should_resched(); })
+#define preempt_count_dec_and_test() \
+	({ preempt_count_sub(1); should_resched(0); })
 #else
 #define preempt_count_add(val)	__preempt_count_add(val)
 #define preempt_count_sub(val)	__preempt_count_sub(val)
@@ -184,7 +193,7 @@ do { \
 
 #define preempt_check_resched() \
 do { \
-	if (should_resched()) \
+	if (should_resched(0)) \
 		__preempt_schedule(); \
 } while (0)
 
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index ae21f1591615..a8e9b17acdee 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2885,12 +2885,6 @@ extern int _cond_resched(void);
 
 extern int __cond_resched_lock(spinlock_t *lock);
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT
-#define PREEMPT_LOCK_OFFSET	PREEMPT_OFFSET
-#else
-#define PREEMPT_LOCK_OFFSET	0
-#endif
-
 #define cond_resched_lock(lock) ({				\
 	___might_sleep(__FILE__, __LINE__, PREEMPT_LOCK_OFFSET);\
 	__cond_resched_lock(lock);				\
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 78b4bad10081..d9a4d93dc879 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -4492,7 +4492,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE0(sched_yield)
 
 int __sched _cond_resched(void)
 {
-	if (should_resched()) {
+	if (should_resched(0)) {
 		preempt_schedule_common();
 		return 1;
 	}
@@ -4510,7 +4510,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(_cond_resched);
  */
 int __cond_resched_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
 {
-	int resched = should_resched();
+	int resched = should_resched(PREEMPT_LOCK_OFFSET);
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(lock);
@@ -4532,7 +4532,7 @@ int __sched __cond_resched_softirq(void)
 {
 	BUG_ON(!in_softirq());
 
-	if (should_resched()) {
+	if (should_resched(SOFTIRQ_DISABLE_OFFSET)) {
 		local_bh_enable();
 		preempt_schedule_common();
 		local_bh_disable();

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] sched/preempt: fix cond_resched_lock() and cond_resched_softirq()
       [not found] ` <20150715095204.12246.98268.stgit@buzz>
@ 2015-07-15 12:16   ` Eric Dumazet
       [not found]   ` <1436962596.1026.10.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2015-07-15 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Konstantin Khlebnikov
  Cc: linux-arch, Peter Zijlstra, x86, linux-kernel, kvm-ppc,
	Alexander Graf, Paul Mackerras, David Vrabel, xen-devel,
	Boris Ostrovsky, linuxppc-dev

On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 12:52 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> These functions check should_resched() before unlocking spinlock/bh-enable:
> preempt_count always non-zero => should_resched() always returns false.
> cond_resched_lock() worked iff spin_needbreak is set.

Interesting, this definitely used to work (linux-3.11)

Any idea of which commit broke things ?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] sched/preempt: fix cond_resched_lock() and cond_resched_softirq()
       [not found]   ` <1436962596.1026.10.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
@ 2015-07-15 12:52     ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
       [not found]     ` <55A65792.80903@yandex-team.ru>
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Konstantin Khlebnikov @ 2015-07-15 12:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eric Dumazet
  Cc: linux-arch, Peter Zijlstra, x86, linux-kernel, kvm-ppc,
	Alexander Graf, Paul Mackerras, David Vrabel, xen-devel,
	Boris Ostrovsky, linuxppc-dev

On 15.07.2015 15:16, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 12:52 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>> These functions check should_resched() before unlocking spinlock/bh-enable:
>> preempt_count always non-zero => should_resched() always returns false.
>> cond_resched_lock() worked iff spin_needbreak is set.
>
> Interesting, this definitely used to work (linux-3.11)
>
> Any idea of which commit broke things ?
>

Searching... done

This one: bdb43806589096ac4272fe1307e789846ac08d7c in v3.13

before

-static inline int should_resched(void)
-{
-       return need_resched() && !(preempt_count() & PREEMPT_ACTIVE);
-}

after

+static __always_inline bool should_resched(void)
+{
+       return unlikely(!*preempt_count_ptr());
+}


So,

Fixes: bdb438065890 ("sched: Extract the basic add/sub preempt_count 
modifiers")

-- 
Konstantin

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] sched/preempt: fix cond_resched_lock() and cond_resched_softirq()
       [not found]     ` <55A65792.80903@yandex-team.ru>
@ 2015-07-15 13:35       ` Peter Zijlstra
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2015-07-15 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Konstantin Khlebnikov
  Cc: linux-arch, Eric Dumazet, x86, linux-kernel, kvm-ppc,
	Alexander Graf, Paul Mackerras, David Vrabel, xen-devel,
	Boris Ostrovsky, linuxppc-dev

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 03:52:34PM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> On 15.07.2015 15:16, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 12:52 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> >>These functions check should_resched() before unlocking spinlock/bh-enable:
> >>preempt_count always non-zero => should_resched() always returns false.
> >>cond_resched_lock() worked iff spin_needbreak is set.
> >
> >Interesting, this definitely used to work (linux-3.11)
> >
> >Any idea of which commit broke things ?
> >
> 
> Searching... done
> 
> This one: bdb43806589096ac4272fe1307e789846ac08d7c in v3.13
> 
> before
> 
> -static inline int should_resched(void)
> -{
> -       return need_resched() && !(preempt_count() & PREEMPT_ACTIVE);
> -}
> 
> after
> 
> +static __always_inline bool should_resched(void)
> +{
> +       return unlikely(!*preempt_count_ptr());
> +}

Argh, indeed!

> 
> So,
> 
> Fixes: bdb438065890 ("sched: Extract the basic add/sub preempt_count
> modifiers")

Thanks!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] drivers/xen/preempt: use need_resched() instead of should_resched()
       [not found] <20150715095201.12246.49283.stgit@buzz>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
       [not found] ` <20150715095204.12246.98268.stgit@buzz>
@ 2015-07-20 13:41 ` David Vrabel
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Vrabel @ 2015-07-20 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Konstantin Khlebnikov, Peter Zijlstra
  Cc: linux-arch, x86, linux-kernel, kvm-ppc, Alexander Graf,
	Paul Mackerras, David Vrabel, xen-devel, Boris Ostrovsky,
	linuxppc-dev

On 15/07/15 10:52, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> This code is used only when CONFIG_PREEMPT=n and only in non-atomic context:
> xen_in_preemptible_hcall is set only in privcmd_ioctl_hypercall().
> Thus preempt_count is zero and should_resched() is equal to need_resched().

Applied to for-linus-4.3, thanks.

David

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 1/3] drivers/xen/preempt: use need_resched() instead of should_resched()
@ 2015-07-15  9:52 Konstantin Khlebnikov
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Konstantin Khlebnikov @ 2015-07-15  9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Zijlstra
  Cc: linux-arch, x86, linux-kernel, kvm-ppc, Alexander Graf,
	Paul Mackerras, David Vrabel, xen-devel, Boris Ostrovsky,
	linuxppc-dev

This code is used only when CONFIG_PREEMPT=n and only in non-atomic context:
xen_in_preemptible_hcall is set only in privcmd_ioctl_hypercall().
Thus preempt_count is zero and should_resched() is equal to need_resched().

Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
---
 drivers/xen/preempt.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/xen/preempt.c b/drivers/xen/preempt.c
index a1800c150839..08cb419eb4e6 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/preempt.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/preempt.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_in_preemptible_hcall);
 asmlinkage __visible void xen_maybe_preempt_hcall(void)
 {
 	if (unlikely(__this_cpu_read(xen_in_preemptible_hcall)
-		     && should_resched())) {
+		     && need_resched())) {
 		/*
 		 * Clear flag as we may be rescheduled on a different
 		 * cpu.

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-07-20 13:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20150715095201.12246.49283.stgit@buzz>
2015-07-15  9:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Use need_resched() instead of should_resched() Konstantin Khlebnikov
2015-07-15  9:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] sched/preempt: fix cond_resched_lock() and cond_resched_softirq() Konstantin Khlebnikov
     [not found] ` <20150715095204.12246.98268.stgit@buzz>
2015-07-15 12:16   ` Eric Dumazet
     [not found]   ` <1436962596.1026.10.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
2015-07-15 12:52     ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
     [not found]     ` <55A65792.80903@yandex-team.ru>
2015-07-15 13:35       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-20 13:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] drivers/xen/preempt: use need_resched() instead of should_resched() David Vrabel
2015-07-15  9:52 Konstantin Khlebnikov

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).