* [PATCH] Enable per-VCPU parameter settings for RTDS scheduler
@ 2015-07-24 15:39 Chong Li
2015-07-24 15:54 ` Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chong Li @ 2015-07-24 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
Hi,
I sent out a new version of our patchset (enable per-VCPU parameter
settings for RTDS scheduler) two weeks ago. Can I get some feedbacks
and comments about it? I'm waiting for these so that I can work out
the next version soon.
Best!
Chong
--
Chong Li
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Washington University in St.louis
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Enable per-VCPU parameter settings for RTDS scheduler
2015-07-24 15:39 [PATCH] Enable per-VCPU parameter settings for RTDS scheduler Chong Li
@ 2015-07-24 15:54 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-24 16:06 ` Chong Li
2015-07-24 16:09 ` Ian Campbell
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2015-07-24 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chong Li; +Cc: xen-devel
>>> On 24.07.15 at 17:39, <lichong659@gmail.com> wrote:
> I sent out a new version of our patchset (enable per-VCPU parameter
> settings for RTDS scheduler) two weeks ago. Can I get some feedbacks
> and comments about it? I'm waiting for these so that I can work out
> the next version soon.
First of all, such a ping would better be sent as a reply to the original
submission.
And then, if you mean
http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-07/msg02240.html
then I replied (without any further reaction) in
http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-07/msg02334.html
and considering the feature freeze you probably should be a little
more patient (e.g. ping when the development tree re-opened).
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Enable per-VCPU parameter settings for RTDS scheduler
2015-07-24 15:54 ` Jan Beulich
@ 2015-07-24 16:06 ` Chong Li
2015-07-24 16:09 ` Ian Campbell
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chong Li @ 2015-07-24 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: xen-devel
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>>>> On 24.07.15 at 17:39, <lichong659@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I sent out a new version of our patchset (enable per-VCPU parameter
>> settings for RTDS scheduler) two weeks ago. Can I get some feedbacks
>> and comments about it? I'm waiting for these so that I can work out
>> the next version soon.
>
> First of all, such a ping would better be sent as a reply to the original
> submission.
>
> And then, if you mean
> http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-07/msg02240.html
Yes. That's my original submission.
> then I replied (without any further reaction) in
> http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-07/msg02334.html
> and considering the feature freeze you probably should be a little
> more patient (e.g. ping when the development tree re-opened).
Sure, thanks for your reply.
>
> Jan
>
--
Chong Li
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Washington University in St.louis
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Enable per-VCPU parameter settings for RTDS scheduler
2015-07-24 15:54 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-24 16:06 ` Chong Li
@ 2015-07-24 16:09 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-24 16:14 ` Jan Beulich
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ian Campbell @ 2015-07-24 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich, Chong Li; +Cc: xen-devel
On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 09:54 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> considering the feature freeze you probably should be a little
> more patient (e.g. ping when the development tree re-opened).
I don't think all 4.7 development needs to come to a halt just because we
have frozen for 4.6. Although 4.6 should be the priority, not all devs and
maintainers will be spending 100% of their time on 4.6 related stuff).
So while maybe waiting a bit longer than usual would be good advice I don't
think waiting for the development tree to reopen is correct.
A series can still be reviewed, revised and reposted during the freeze
until they are in a state to go in, at which point they may need to be
parked or queued until the tree reopens.
Ian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Enable per-VCPU parameter settings for RTDS scheduler
2015-07-24 16:09 ` Ian Campbell
@ 2015-07-24 16:14 ` Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2015-07-24 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Campbell; +Cc: Chong Li, xen-devel
>>> On 24.07.15 at 18:09, <ian.campbell@citrix.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 09:54 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> considering the feature freeze you probably should be a little
>> more patient (e.g. ping when the development tree re-opened).
>
> I don't think all 4.7 development needs to come to a halt just because we
> have frozen for 4.6. Although 4.6 should be the priority, not all devs and
> maintainers will be spending 100% of their time on 4.6 related stuff).
>
> So while maybe waiting a bit longer than usual would be good advice I don't
> think waiting for the development tree to reopen is correct.
>
> A series can still be reviewed, revised and reposted during the freeze
> until they are in a state to go in, at which point they may need to be
> parked or queued until the tree reopens.
Which I agree with, and which I don't think my reply excluded.
Anyway - I was mainly puzzled by the ping because I had replied,
without myself getting a reply...
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-07-24 16:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-07-24 15:39 [PATCH] Enable per-VCPU parameter settings for RTDS scheduler Chong Li
2015-07-24 15:54 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-24 16:06 ` Chong Li
2015-07-24 16:09 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-24 16:14 ` Jan Beulich
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).