xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
	Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-4.6 v2 7/8] python/xc: reinstate original implementation of next_bdf
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 09:06:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55B6D59E.6010600@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1438019109-31997-8-git-send-email-wei.liu2@citrix.com>

On 2015/7/28 1:45, Wei Liu wrote:
> I missed the fact that next_bdf is used to parsed user supplied
> strings when reviewing. The user supplied string is a NULL-terminated
> string separated by comma. User can supply several PCI devices in that
> string. There is, however, no delimiter for different devices, hence
> we can't change the syntax of that string.
>
> This patch reinstate the original implementation of next_bdf to
> preserve the original syntax. The last argument for xc_assign_device
> is always 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
> ---
> Cc: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
>
> Tiejun, are you actually using this python binding? I don't think we

This change is just following to RMRR series but currently we don't use 
this. So its fine if you think this don't break any other usages.

Thanks
Tiejun

> have in tree user.
>
> If nobody is using it, I propose we remove this binding in next
> release.
>
> I don't have live example of that string. My analysis is based on
> reverse-engineering of original code.
> ---
>   tools/python/xen/lowlevel/xc/xc.c | 30 ++++++++++--------------------
>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/python/xen/lowlevel/xc/xc.c b/tools/python/xen/lowlevel/xc/xc.c
> index c8380d1..2c36eb2 100644
> --- a/tools/python/xen/lowlevel/xc/xc.c
> +++ b/tools/python/xen/lowlevel/xc/xc.c
> @@ -592,8 +592,7 @@ static int token_value(char *token)
>       return strtol(token, NULL, 16);
>   }
>
> -static int next_bdf(char **str, int *seg, int *bus, int *dev, int *func,
> -                    int *flag)
> +static int next_bdf(char **str, int *seg, int *bus, int *dev, int *func)
>   {
>       char *token;
>
> @@ -608,17 +607,8 @@ static int next_bdf(char **str, int *seg, int *bus, int *dev, int *func,
>       *dev  = token_value(token);
>       token = strchr(token, ',') + 1;
>       *func  = token_value(token);
> -    token = strchr(token, ',') + 1;
> -    if ( token ) {
> -        *flag = token_value(token);
> -        *str = token + 1;
> -    }
> -    else
> -    {
> -        /* O means we take "strict" as our default policy. */
> -        *flag = 0;
> -        *str = NULL;
> -    }
> +    token = strchr(token, ',');
> +    *str = token ? token + 1 : NULL;
>
>       return 1;
>   }
> @@ -630,14 +620,14 @@ static PyObject *pyxc_test_assign_device(XcObject *self,
>       uint32_t dom;
>       char *pci_str;
>       int32_t sbdf = 0;
> -    int seg, bus, dev, func, flag;
> +    int seg, bus, dev, func;
>
>       static char *kwd_list[] = { "domid", "pci", NULL };
>       if ( !PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords(args, kwds, "is", kwd_list,
>                                         &dom, &pci_str) )
>           return NULL;
>
> -    while ( next_bdf(&pci_str, &seg, &bus, &dev, &func, &flag) )
> +    while ( next_bdf(&pci_str, &seg, &bus, &dev, &func) )
>       {
>           sbdf = seg << 16;
>           sbdf |= (bus & 0xff) << 8;
> @@ -663,21 +653,21 @@ static PyObject *pyxc_assign_device(XcObject *self,
>       uint32_t dom;
>       char *pci_str;
>       int32_t sbdf = 0;
> -    int seg, bus, dev, func, flag;
> +    int seg, bus, dev, func;
>
>       static char *kwd_list[] = { "domid", "pci", NULL };
>       if ( !PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords(args, kwds, "is", kwd_list,
>                                         &dom, &pci_str) )
>           return NULL;
>
> -    while ( next_bdf(&pci_str, &seg, &bus, &dev, &func, &flag) )
> +    while ( next_bdf(&pci_str, &seg, &bus, &dev, &func) )
>       {
>           sbdf = seg << 16;
>           sbdf |= (bus & 0xff) << 8;
>           sbdf |= (dev & 0x1f) << 3;
>           sbdf |= (func & 0x7);
>
> -        if ( xc_assign_device(self->xc_handle, dom, sbdf, flag) != 0 )
> +        if ( xc_assign_device(self->xc_handle, dom, sbdf, 0) != 0 )
>           {
>               if (errno == ENOSYS)
>                   sbdf = -1;
> @@ -696,14 +686,14 @@ static PyObject *pyxc_deassign_device(XcObject *self,
>       uint32_t dom;
>       char *pci_str;
>       int32_t sbdf = 0;
> -    int seg, bus, dev, func, flag;
> +    int seg, bus, dev, func;
>
>       static char *kwd_list[] = { "domid", "pci", NULL };
>       if ( !PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords(args, kwds, "is", kwd_list,
>                                         &dom, &pci_str) )
>           return NULL;
>
> -    while ( next_bdf(&pci_str, &seg, &bus, &dev, &func, &flag) )
> +    while ( next_bdf(&pci_str, &seg, &bus, &dev, &func) )
>       {
>           sbdf = seg << 16;
>           sbdf |= (bus & 0xff) << 8;
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-07-28  1:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-27 17:45 [PATCH for-4.6 v2 0/8] tools: fixes inspired by Coverity scan Wei Liu
2015-07-27 17:45 ` [PATCH for-4.6 v2 1/8] libxl: properly clean up array in libxl_list_cpupool failure path Wei Liu
2015-07-28  8:39   ` Dario Faggioli
2015-07-28 10:27   ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-27 17:45 ` [PATCH for-4.6 v2 2/8] xl: lockdir should be lockfile in error message Wei Liu
2015-07-28 10:27   ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-27 17:45 ` [PATCH for-4.6 v2 3/8] xl: call libxl_dominfo_init in main_list Wei Liu
2015-07-28 10:28   ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-27 17:45 ` [PATCH for-4.6 v2 4/8] xl: valid fd can be 0 in main_loadpolicy Wei Liu
2015-07-28 10:28   ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-27 17:45 ` [PATCH for-4.6 v2 5/8] xl: call libxl_dominfo_{init, dispose} in main_cpupoolnumasplit Wei Liu
2015-07-28  9:49   ` Dario Faggioli
2015-07-28 10:33   ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-27 17:45 ` [PATCH for-4.6 v2 6/8] libxlu: free buffer in failure path for PCI related functions Wei Liu
2015-07-28 10:35   ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-27 17:45 ` [PATCH for-4.6 v2 7/8] python/xc: reinstate original implementation of next_bdf Wei Liu
2015-07-27 22:58   ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-28  1:06   ` Chen, Tiejun [this message]
2015-07-28 10:38   ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-28 10:44     ` Wei Liu
2015-07-27 17:45 ` [PATCH for-4.6 v2 8/8] libxl: remove dead code libxl__domain_shutdown_reason Wei Liu
2015-07-28 10:52   ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-28 11:08 ` [PATCH for-4.6 v2 0/8] tools: fixes inspired by Coverity scan Ian Campbell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55B6D59E.6010600@intel.com \
    --to=tiejun.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).