From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
To: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>,
Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@amd.com>,
Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/HVM: honor p2m_ram_ro in hvm_map_guest_frame_rw()
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 09:37:13 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55CA32C90200007800099B76@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150811143407.GB884@deinos.phlegethon.org>
>>> On 11.08.15 at 16:34, <tim@xen.org> wrote:
> At 07:51 -0600 on 11 Aug (1439279513), Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 27.07.15 at 13:09, <tim@xen.org> wrote:
>> > At 13:02 +0100 on 24 Jul (1437742964), Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> >> On 24/07/15 10:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> > Beyond that log-dirty handling in _hvm_map_guest_frame() looks bogus
>> >> > too: What if a XEN_DOMCTL_SHADOW_OP_* gets issued and acted upon
>> >> > between the setting of the dirty flag and the actual write happening?
>> >> > I.e. shouldn't the flag instead be set in hvm_unmap_guest_frame()?
>> >>
>> >> It does indeed. (Ideally the dirty bit should probably be held high for
>> >> the duration that a mapping exists, but that is absolutely infeasible to
>> >> do).
>> >
>> > IMO that would not be very useful -- a well-behaved toolstack will
>> > have to make sure that relevant mappings are torn down before
>> > stop-and-copy. Forcing the dirty bit high in the meantime just makes
>> > every intermediate pass send a wasted copy of the page, without
>> > actually closing the race window if the tools are buggy.
>>
>> Making sure such mappings got torn down in time doesn't help
>> when the most recent write happened _after_ the most recent
>> clearing of the dirty flag in a pass prior to stop-and-copy.
>
> This is why e.g. __gnttab_unmap_common sets the dirty bit again
> as it unmaps.
And how does this help when the mapping survives until the guest
gets suspended? And why would doing it _again_ when unmapping
be better than doing it _only_ then?
But in any event I read this as agreement that moving (or in the
worst case replicating) the hvm_map_guest_frame_rw() one into
hvm_unmap_guest_frame() would be an appropriate thing to do.
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-11 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-24 9:41 [PATCH] x86/HVM: honor p2m_ram_ro in hvm_map_guest_frame_rw() Jan Beulich
2015-07-24 10:26 ` Wei Liu
2015-07-24 10:37 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-24 10:41 ` Wei Liu
2015-07-24 12:02 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-24 12:33 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-27 11:09 ` Tim Deegan
2015-08-11 13:51 ` Jan Beulich
2015-08-11 14:34 ` Tim Deegan
2015-08-11 15:37 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2015-08-11 15:45 ` Tim Deegan
2015-08-11 16:01 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-31 1:41 ` Tian, Kevin
2015-07-31 16:06 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-08-11 10:32 ` Jan Beulich
2015-08-14 10:38 ` Jan Beulich
2015-08-14 13:26 ` Boris Ostrovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55CA32C90200007800099B76@prv-mh.provo.novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=aravind.gopalakrishnan@amd.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=eddie.dong@intel.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).