From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>,
Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC Design Doc] Add vNVDIMM support for Xen
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 18:25:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56AFA319.8070801@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160201054414.GA25211@hz-desktop.sh.intel.com>
On 01/02/16 05:44, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The following document describes the design of adding vNVDIMM support
> for Xen. Any comments are welcome.
>
> Thanks,
> Haozhong
Thankyou for doing this. It is a very comprehensive document, and a
fantastic example for future similar situations.
To start with however, I would like to clear up my confusion over the
the usecases of pmem vs pblk.
pblk, using indirect access, is less efficient than pmem. NVDIMMs
themselves are slower (and presumably more expensive) than equivalent
RAM, and presumably still has a finite number of write cycles, so I
don't buy an argument suggesting that they are a plausible replacement
for real RAM.
I presume therefore that a system would only choose to use pblk mode in
situations where the host physical address space is a limiting factor.
Are there other situations which I have overlooked?
Secondly, I presume that pmem vs pblk will be a firmware decision and
fixed from the point of view of the Operating System?
Thanks,
~Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-01 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 121+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-01 5:44 [RFC Design Doc] Add vNVDIMM support for Xen Haozhong Zhang
2016-02-01 18:25 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2016-02-02 3:27 ` Tian, Kevin
2016-02-02 3:44 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-02-02 11:09 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-02 6:33 ` Tian, Kevin
2016-02-02 7:39 ` Zhang, Haozhong
2016-02-02 7:48 ` Tian, Kevin
2016-02-02 7:53 ` Zhang, Haozhong
2016-02-02 8:03 ` Tian, Kevin
2016-02-02 8:49 ` Zhang, Haozhong
2016-02-02 19:01 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-02-02 17:11 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-02-03 7:00 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-02-03 9:13 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-03 14:09 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-03 14:23 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-02-05 14:40 ` Ross Philipson
2016-02-06 1:43 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-02-06 16:17 ` Ross Philipson
2016-02-03 12:02 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-02-03 13:11 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-02-03 14:20 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-04 3:10 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-02-03 15:16 ` George Dunlap
2016-02-03 15:22 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-02-03 15:35 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-02-03 15:35 ` George Dunlap
2016-02-04 2:55 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-02-04 12:24 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-02-15 3:16 ` Zhang, Haozhong
2016-02-16 11:14 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-02-16 12:55 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 9:03 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-03-04 7:30 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-03-16 12:55 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-03-16 13:13 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-03-16 13:16 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-16 13:55 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-03-16 14:23 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-16 14:55 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-03-16 15:23 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-17 8:58 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-03-17 11:04 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-17 12:44 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-03-17 12:59 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-17 13:29 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-03-17 13:52 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-17 14:00 ` Ian Jackson
2016-03-17 14:21 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-03-29 8:47 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-03-29 9:11 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-29 10:10 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-03-29 10:49 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-08 5:02 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-04-08 15:52 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-12 8:45 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-04-21 5:09 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-04-21 7:04 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-22 2:36 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-04-22 8:24 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-22 10:16 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-04-22 10:53 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-22 12:26 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-04-22 12:36 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-22 12:54 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-04-22 13:22 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-17 13:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-02-03 15:47 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-02-04 2:36 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-02-15 9:04 ` Zhang, Haozhong
2016-02-02 19:15 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-02-03 8:28 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-02-03 9:18 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-03 12:22 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-02-03 12:38 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-03 12:49 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-02-03 14:30 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-03 14:39 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-15 8:43 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-02-15 11:07 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 9:01 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-02-17 9:08 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-18 7:42 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-02-19 2:14 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-03-01 7:39 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-03-01 18:33 ` Ian Jackson
2016-03-01 18:49 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-03-02 7:14 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-03-02 13:03 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-04 2:20 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-03-08 9:15 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-03-08 9:27 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-09 12:22 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-03-09 16:17 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-10 3:27 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-03-17 11:05 ` Ian Jackson
2016-03-17 13:37 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-03-17 13:56 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-17 14:22 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-03-17 14:12 ` Xu, Quan
2016-03-17 14:22 ` Zhang, Haozhong
2016-03-07 20:53 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-03-08 5:50 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-02-18 17:17 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-24 13:28 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-02-24 14:00 ` Ross Philipson
2016-02-24 16:42 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-02-24 17:50 ` Ross Philipson
2016-02-24 14:24 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-24 15:48 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-02-24 16:54 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-28 14:48 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-02-29 9:01 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-29 9:45 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-02-29 10:12 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-29 11:52 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-02-29 12:04 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-29 12:22 ` Haozhong Zhang
2016-03-01 13:51 ` Ian Jackson
2016-03-01 15:04 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56AFA319.8070801@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=haozhong.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).