xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/21] xen/x86: Generate deep dependencies of features
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 16:18:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5707CBE2.3090709@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5707D99D02000078000E60DF@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>

On 08/04/16 16:17, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 08.04.16 at 01:36, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>> On 08/04/2016 00:18, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 07.04.16 at 13:57, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>> +    deps = {
>>>> +        # FPU is taken to mean support for the x87 regisers as well as the
>>>> +        # instructions.  MMX is documented to alias the %MM registers over the
>>>> +        # x87 %ST registers in hardware.
>>>> +        FPU: [MMX],
>>>> +
>>>> +        # The PSE36 feature indicates that reserved bits in a PSE superpage
>>>> +        # may be used as extra physical address bits.
>>>> +        PSE: [PSE36],
>>>> +
>>>> +        # Entering Long Mode requires that %CR4.PAE is set.  The NX and PKU
>>>> +        # pagetable bits are only representable in the 64bit PTE format
>>>> +        # offered by PAE.
>>>> +        PAE: [LM, NX, PKU],
>>> PKU is explicitly documented to be available only in IA-32e paging,
>>> so I think it should be listed as a dependent of LM.
>> I am not so sure.  Unlike PCID, it is not declared that setting CR4.PKE
>> will result in a #GP fault out of Long Mode, and the description does
>> say "If CR4.PKE = 0, or if IA-32e paging is not active, the processor
>> does not associate linear addresses with protection keys".
>>
>> This suggests that CR4.PKE can be set out of Long Mode, but all
>> pagewalks will act as if key0 is in use.  PCID on the other hand goes to
>> lengths declaring that you can't set CR4.PCIDE out of Long Mode, nor may
>> you attempt to exit Long Mode if it is set.
>>
>> I do have some Skylake hardware with PKU available in the office.  I
>> will investigate what really happens in this case.  (I am also mindful
>> of the fact that 32bit PV guests could in principle use PKU, at which
>> point the dependency on LM would be counter-productive.)
> With the goal of the series going in soon (today?), wouldn't putting
> in the tighter variant be the better approach, allowing us to relax
> things if we find they can be relaxed?

At this point, yes.  I will make a note when changing.

I need to rebase anyway as there is a textual collision with the xsave
bugfixes from yesterday.

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-08 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-07 11:57 [PATCH v5 00/21] x86: Improvements to cpuid handling for guests Andrew Cooper
2016-04-07 11:57 ` [PATCH v5 01/21] xen/x86: Annotate VM applicability in featureset Andrew Cooper
2016-04-07 23:01   ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-07 11:57 ` [PATCH v5 02/21] xen/x86: Calculate maximum host and guest featuresets Andrew Cooper
2016-04-07 23:04   ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-07 11:57 ` [PATCH v5 03/21] xen/x86: Generate deep dependencies of features Andrew Cooper
2016-04-07 23:18   ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-07 23:36     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-04-08 15:17       ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-08 15:18         ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2016-04-07 11:57 ` [PATCH v5 04/21] xen/x86: Clear dependent features when clearing a cpu cap Andrew Cooper
2016-04-08 15:36   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-04-07 11:57 ` [PATCH v5 05/21] xen/x86: Improve disabling of features which have dependencies Andrew Cooper
2016-04-08 15:04   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-04-07 11:57 ` [PATCH v5 06/21] xen/x86: Improvements to in-hypervisor cpuid sanity checks Andrew Cooper
2016-04-08 16:10   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-04-08 18:06   ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-07 11:57 ` [PATCH v5 07/21] x86/cpu: Move set_cpumask() calls into c_early_init() Andrew Cooper
2016-04-08 18:09   ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-07 11:57 ` [PATCH v5 08/21] x86/cpu: Sysctl and common infrastructure for levelling context switching Andrew Cooper
2016-04-07 16:54   ` Daniel De Graaf
2016-04-08 16:12   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-04-07 11:57 ` [PATCH v5 09/21] x86/cpu: Rework AMD masking MSR setup Andrew Cooper
2016-04-08 16:13   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-04-07 11:57 ` [PATCH v5 10/21] x86/cpu: Rework Intel masking/faulting setup Andrew Cooper
2016-04-08 16:14   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-04-07 11:57 ` [PATCH v5 11/21] x86/cpu: Context switch cpuid masks and faulting state in context_switch() Andrew Cooper
2016-04-08 16:15   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-04-07 11:57 ` [PATCH v5 12/21] x86/pv: Provide custom cpumasks for PV domains Andrew Cooper
2016-04-08 16:17   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-04-07 11:57 ` [PATCH v5 13/21] x86/domctl: Update PV domain cpumasks when setting cpuid policy Andrew Cooper
2016-04-08 16:26   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-04-07 11:57 ` [PATCH v5 14/21] xen+tools: Export maximum host and guest cpu featuresets via SYSCTL Andrew Cooper
2016-04-07 16:54   ` Daniel De Graaf
2016-04-08 16:32   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-04-07 11:57 ` [PATCH v5 15/21] tools/libxc: Modify bitmap operations to take void pointers Andrew Cooper
2016-04-07 13:00   ` Wei Liu
2016-04-08 16:34   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-04-07 11:57 ` [PATCH v5 16/21] tools/libxc: Use public/featureset.h for cpuid policy generation Andrew Cooper
2016-04-08 16:37   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-04-07 11:57 ` [PATCH v5 17/21] tools/libxc: Expose the automatically generated cpu featuremask information Andrew Cooper
2016-04-08 16:38   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-04-07 11:57 ` [PATCH v5 18/21] tools: Utility for dealing with featuresets Andrew Cooper
2016-04-07 11:57 ` [PATCH v5 19/21] tools/libxc: Wire a featureset through to cpuid policy logic Andrew Cooper
2016-04-07 11:57 ` [PATCH v5 20/21] tools/libxc: Use featuresets rather than guesswork Andrew Cooper
2016-04-07 11:57 ` [PATCH v5 21/21] tools/libxc: Calculate xstate cpuid leaf from guest information Andrew Cooper
2016-04-07 12:58   ` Wei Liu
2016-04-08 21:00   ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-08 21:45     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-04-08 22:38       ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5707CBE2.3090709@citrix.com \
    --to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).