xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
	roger.pau@citrix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 18/20] libxc/acpi: Build ACPI tables for HVMlite guests
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 07:29:54 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <575596F202000078000F2098@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459905949-10358-19-git-send-email-boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>

>>> On 06.04.16 at 03:25, <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/libxc/xc_acpi.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,268 @@
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include <string.h>
> +#include <inttypes.h>
> +#include <assert.h>
> +
> +#include <xen/xen.h>
> +#include <xen/foreign/x86_32.h>
> +#include <xen/foreign/x86_64.h>

Why are these two needed here? The code here shouldn't care
about the mode the guest may later want to run in.

> +#include <xen/hvm/hvm_info_table.h>
> +#include <xen/io/protocols.h>
> +
> +#include "xg_private.h"
> +#include "xc_dom.h"
> +#include "xenctrl.h"
> +
> +#include "acpi2_0.h"
> +
> +#define RESERVED_MEMORY_DYNAMIC_START 0xFC001000
> +#define ACPI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS         0x000EA020
> +
> +/* Initial allocation for ACPI tables */
> +#define NUM_ACPI_PAGES  16

With which other definitions do these three need to remain in sync?

> +#define PFN(paddr)  ((paddr) >> PAGE_SHIFT)
> +
> +extern unsigned char dsdt_anycpu[], dsdt_15cpu[], dsdt_empty[];

const

> +extern int dsdt_anycpu_len, dsdt_15cpu_len, dsdt_empty_len;

And even these may want to be const (and certainly unsigned).

> +static int init_acpi_config(struct xc_dom_image *dom,
> +                            struct acpi_config *config)
> +{
> +    xc_interface *xch = dom->xch;
> +    uint32_t domid = dom->guest_domid;
> +    xc_dominfo_t info;
> +    int i, rc;
> +
> +    memset(config, 0, sizeof(*config));
> +
> +    config->dsdt_anycpu = config->dsdt_15cpu = dsdt_empty;
> +    config->dsdt_anycpu_len = config->dsdt_15cpu_len = dsdt_empty_len;

What good does an empty DSDT do? (Perhaps this question is a
result of there not being any description of this change.)

> +    rc = xc_domain_getinfo(xch, domid, 1, &info);
> +    if ( rc < 0 )
> +    {
> +        DOMPRINTF("%s: getdomaininfo failed (rc=%d)", __FUNCTION__, rc);
> +        return rc;
> +    }
> +
> +    config->apic_mode = 1;
> +
> +    if ( dom->nr_vnodes )
> +    {
> +        struct acpi_numa *numa = &config->numa;
> +
> +        numa->vmemrange = calloc(dom->nr_vmemranges,
> +                                 sizeof(*numa->vmemrange));
> +        numa->vdistance = calloc(dom->nr_vnodes,
> +                                 sizeof(*numa->vdistance));
> +        numa->vcpu_to_vnode = calloc(config->nr_vcpus,
> +                                     sizeof(*numa->vcpu_to_vnode));
> +        if ( !numa->vmemrange || !numa->vdistance || !numa->vcpu_to_vnode )
> +        {
> +            DOMPRINTF("%s: Out of memory", __FUNCTION__);
> +            free(numa->vmemrange);
> +            free(numa->vdistance);
> +            free(numa->vcpu_to_vnode);
> +            return -ENOMEM;
> +        }
> +
> +        rc = xc_domain_getvnuma(xch, domid, &numa->nr_vnodes,
> +                                &numa->nr_vmemranges,
> +                                &config->nr_vcpus, numa->vmemrange,
> +                                numa->vdistance, numa->vcpu_to_vnode);
> +
> +	    if ( rc )
> +        {
> +            DOMPRINTF("%s: xc_domain_getvnuma failed (rc=%d)", __FUNCTION__, rc);
> +            return rc;
> +        }
> +    }
> +    else
> +        config->nr_vcpus = info.max_vcpu_id + 1;
> +
> +    config->vcpu_online = calloc((HVM_MAX_VCPUS + 7) / 8,
> +                                 sizeof(*config->vcpu_online));
> +    if ( config->vcpu_online == NULL )
> +    {
> +        DOMPRINTF("%s: Can't allocate vcpu_online", __FUNCTION__);
> +        return -ENOMEM;
> +    }
> +
> +    for (i=0; i<config->nr_vcpus; i++)

You seem to be mixing styles here.

> +int xc_dom_build_acpi(struct xc_dom_image *dom)
> +{
> +    struct acpi_config config;
> +    uint32_t domid = dom->guest_domid;
> +    xc_interface *xch = dom->xch;
> +    int rc, i, acpi_pages_num;
> +    xen_pfn_t extent, *extents;
> +    void *acpi_pages, *acpi_physical;
> +    void *guest_info_page, *guest_acpi_pages;
> +
> +    rc = init_acpi_config(dom, &config);
> +    if ( rc )
> +    {
> +        DOMPRINTF("%s: init_acpi_config failed (rc=%d)", __FUNCTION__, rc);
> +        return rc;
> +    }
> +
> +    /*
> +     * Pages to hold ACPI tables and one page for acpi_info, which
> +     * will be the first one in this region.
> +     */
> +    acpi_pages = xc_memalign(xch, PAGE_SIZE, NUM_ACPI_PAGES * PAGE_SIZE);
> +    if ( !acpi_pages )
> +    {
> +        DOMPRINTF("%s: Can't allocate acpi pages", __FUNCTION__);
> +        rc = -1;
> +        goto out;
> +    }
> +
> +    config.acpi_info_page = acpi_pages;
> +
> +    /* Set up allocator memory */
> +    base_addr = alloc_up = (unsigned long)acpi_pages + PAGE_SIZE;
> +    alloc_down = (unsigned long)acpi_pages + (NUM_ACPI_PAGES * PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> +    /* Map page that will hold RSDP */
> +    extent = PFN(ACPI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS);
> +    rc = xc_domain_populate_physmap_exact(xch, domid, 1, 0, 0, &extent);
> +    if ( rc )
> +    {
> +        DOMPRINTF("%s: xc_domain_populate_physmap failed with %d",
> +                  __FUNCTION__, rc);
> +        goto out;
> +    }
> +    acpi_physical = xc_map_foreign_range(xch, domid, PAGE_SIZE,
> +                                         PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
> +                                         PFN(ACPI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS));
> +    if ( !acpi_physical )
> +    {
> +        DOMPRINTF("%s: Can't map acpi_physical", __FUNCTION__);
> +        rc = -1;
> +        goto out;
> +    }
> +
> +    /* Build the tables */
> +    acpi_build_tables(&config, (unsigned long)acpi_physical);
> +
> +    /* Copy acpi_info page into guest's memory */
> +    extent = PFN(ACPI_INFO_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS);
> +    rc = xc_domain_populate_physmap_exact(xch, domid, 1, 0, 0, &extent);
> +    if ( rc )
> +    {
> +        DOMPRINTF("%s: xc_domain_populate_physmap failed with %d\n",
> +                  __FUNCTION__, rc);
> +        goto out;
> +    }
> +    guest_info_page = xc_map_foreign_range(xch, domid, PAGE_SIZE,
> +                                           PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
> +                                           PFN(ACPI_INFO_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS));
> +    if ( !guest_info_page )
> +    {
> +        DOMPRINTF("%s: Can't map acpi_info_page", __FUNCTION__);
> +        rc = -1;
> +        goto out;
> +    }
> +    memcpy(guest_info_page, acpi_pages, PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> +    /* Copy ACPI tables into guest's memory */
> +    acpi_pages_num = ((alloc_up - (unsigned long)acpi_pages +
> +                       (PAGE_SIZE - 1)) >> PAGE_SHIFT) - 1;

This looks like there are acpi_pages_num pages starting at
acpi_pages, yet ...

> +    extents = malloc(acpi_pages_num * sizeof(*extents));
> +    if ( !extents )
> +    {
> +        DOMPRINTF("%s: Can't allocate extents array", __FUNCTION__);
> +        rc = -ENOMEM;
> +        goto out;
> +    }
> +    for (i = 0; i < acpi_pages_num; i++)
> +        extents[i] = PFN(RESERVED_MEMORY_DYNAMIC_START) + i;
> +    rc = xc_domain_populate_physmap_exact(xch, domid, acpi_pages_num,
> +                                          0, 0, extents);
> +    if ( rc )
> +    {
> +        DOMPRINTF("%s: xc_domain_populate_physmap failed with %d",
> +                  __FUNCTION__, rc);
> +        goto out;
> +    }
> +    guest_acpi_pages = xc_map_foreign_range(xch, domid,
> +                                            PAGE_SIZE * acpi_pages_num,
> +                                            PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
> +                                            PFN(RESERVED_MEMORY_DYNAMIC_START));
> +    if ( !guest_acpi_pages )
> +    {
> +        DOMPRINTF("%s Can't map guest_acpi_pages", __FUNCTION__);
> +        rc = -1;
> +        goto out;
> +    }
> +
> +    memcpy(guest_acpi_pages, acpi_pages + PAGE_SIZE,
> +           acpi_pages_num * PAGE_SIZE);

... this looks like there are acpi_pages_num pages starting at
acpi_pages + PAGE_SIZE.

> --- a/tools/libxc/xc_dom_x86.c
> +++ b/tools/libxc/xc_dom_x86.c
> @@ -643,6 +643,13 @@ static int alloc_magic_pages_hvm(struct xc_dom_image *dom)
>              DOMPRINTF("Unable to reserve memory for the start info");
>              goto out;
>          }
> +
> +        rc = xc_dom_build_acpi(dom);
> +        if ( rc != 0 )
> +        {
> +            DOMPRINTF("Unable to build ACPI tables");
> +            goto out;
> +        }

Iirc there is an "acpi=" guest config setting, yet neither here nor
down the call tree I have been able to find a respective check. Is
that option not relevant anymore? Do we really want to always
have those tables built?

> --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_x86.c
> +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_x86.c
> @@ -8,15 +8,18 @@ int libxl__arch_domain_prepare_config(libxl__gc *gc,
>                                        xc_domain_configuration_t *xc_config)
>  {
>  
> -    if (d_config->c_info.type == LIBXL_DOMAIN_TYPE_HVM &&
> -        d_config->b_info.device_model_version !=
> -        LIBXL_DEVICE_MODEL_VERSION_NONE) {
> -        /* HVM domains with a device model. */
> -        xc_config->emulation_flags = XEN_X86_EMU_ALL;
> -    } else {
> -        /* PV or HVM domains without a device model. */
> +    if (d_config->c_info.type == LIBXL_DOMAIN_TYPE_HVM) {
> +        if (d_config->b_info.device_model_version !=
> +            LIBXL_DEVICE_MODEL_VERSION_NONE)
> +            xc_config->emulation_flags = XEN_X86_EMU_ALL;
> +        else
> +            /*
> +             * HVM guests without device model will want
> +             * to have LAPIC emulation.
> +             */
> +            xc_config->emulation_flags = XEN_X86_EMU_LAPIC;
> +    } else 
>          xc_config->emulation_flags = 0;
> -    }

I'm not maintainer of this code, but I think this would read better if
you used an if/else if/else sequence instead of nested if.

> --- a/xen/common/libacpi/build.c
> +++ b/xen/common/libacpi/build.c
> @@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ static int new_vm_gid(struct acpi_config *config)
>      return 1;
>  }
>  
> -void acpi_build_tables(struct acpi_config *config, unsigned int physical)
> +void acpi_build_tables(struct acpi_config *config, unsigned long physical)

I'm having some difficulty seeing how this change belongs here.

Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-06-06 13:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-06  1:25 [PATCH RFC 00/20] Make ACPI builder available to components other than hvmloader Boris Ostrovsky
2016-04-06  1:25 ` [PATCH RFC 01/20] hvmloader: Provide hvmloader_acpi_build_tables() Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-02 12:42   ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-02 16:39     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-04-06  1:25 ` [PATCH RFC 02/20] acpi/hvmloader: Move acpi_info initialization out of ACPI code Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-02 12:54   ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-02 16:54     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-03 12:13       ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-03 14:42         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-03 14:55           ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-03 15:29             ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-04-06  1:25 ` [PATCH RFC 03/20] acpi/hvmloader: Initialize vm_gid data outside " Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-02 13:03   ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-02 17:01     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-04-06  1:25 ` [PATCH RFC 04/20] acpi/hvmloader: Decide which SSDTs to build in hvmloader Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-02 13:07   ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-06  1:25 ` [PATCH RFC 05/20] acpi/hvmloader: Move passthrough initialization from ACPI code Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-02 13:52   ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-06  1:25 ` [PATCH RFC 06/20] acpi/hvmloader: Collect processor and NUMA info in hvmloader Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-02 14:05   ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-02 17:18     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-03 12:16       ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-03 14:49         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-04-06  1:25 ` [PATCH RFC 07/20] acpi/hvmloader: Set TIS header address " Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-02 14:09   ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-06  1:25 ` [PATCH RFC 08/20] acpi/hvmloader: Make providing IOAPIC in MADT optional Boris Ostrovsky
2016-04-06  1:25 ` [PATCH RFC 09/20] acpi/hvmloader: Build WAET optionally Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-02 14:32   ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-06  1:25 ` [PATCH RFC 10/20] acpi/hvmloader: Provide address of acpi_info as an argument to ACPI code Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-03 16:03   ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-06  1:25 ` [PATCH RFC 11/20] acpi/hvmloader: Translate all addresses when assigning addresses in ACPI tables Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-06 10:48   ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-06  1:25 ` [PATCH RFC 12/20] acpi/hvmloader: Link ACPI object files directly Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-06 11:04   ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-06 14:20     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-06 14:29       ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-06 14:49         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-06 14:57           ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-06 15:31           ` Andrew Cooper
2016-06-06 15:41             ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-06  1:25 ` [PATCH RFC 13/20] acpi/hvmloader: Add stdio.h, string.h and x86.h Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-06 11:31   ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-06 15:08     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-06 15:22       ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-06  1:25 ` [PATCH RFC 14/20] acpi/hvmloader: Replace mem_alloc() and virt_to_phys() with memory ops Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-06 12:58   ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-06 15:46     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-04-06  1:25 ` [PATCH RFC 15/20] acpi: Move ACPI code to xen/common/libacpi Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-06 13:05   ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-06 16:09     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-07  6:20       ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-07 12:24       ` Roger Pau Monné
2016-06-07 14:32         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-04-06  1:25 ` [PATCH RFC 16/20] x86/vlapic: Don't try to accept 8259 interrupt if !has_vpic() Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-03 16:14   ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-03 17:50     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-04-06  1:25 ` [PATCH RFC 17/20] x86: Allow LAPIC-only emulation_flags for HVM guests Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-03 16:18   ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-06  1:25 ` [PATCH RFC 18/20] libxc/acpi: Build ACPI tables for HVMlite guests Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-02 16:26   ` Roger Pau Monné
2016-06-06 12:03   ` Wei Liu
2016-06-06 15:15     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-16  8:54       ` Wei Liu
2016-06-16 13:07         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-06 13:29   ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2016-06-06 16:59     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-07  6:17       ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-07 13:59         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-07 14:10           ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-07 14:47             ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-07 15:00               ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-06  1:25 ` [PATCH RFC 19/20] acpi: Set HW_REDUCED_ACPI in FADT if IOAPIC is not supported Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-06 13:38   ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-06 17:31     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-07  6:06       ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-07 14:02         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-07 14:12           ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-07 15:17             ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-07 15:41               ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-08 22:04                 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-09  8:13                   ` Roger Pau Monné
2016-06-09  8:41                     ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-09 14:09                       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-04-06  1:25 ` [PATCH RFC 20/20] acpi: Make ACPI builder available to hypervisor code Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-06 13:48   ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-09 20:10 ` [PATCH RFC 00/20] Make ACPI builder available to components other than hvmloader Boris Ostrovsky
2016-05-10  7:25   ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-02 12:40 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-02 16:37   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-03  7:18     ` Roger Pau Monné
2016-06-03 10:08       ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=575596F202000078000F2098@prv-mh.provo.novell.com \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).