xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <JGross@suse.com>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] xen-pciback: clean up {bar, rom}_init()
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 01:24:31 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5770F0CF02000078000F8DD3__11195.3474850909$1467012344$gmane$org@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <576D4B59.9070906@citrix.com>

>>> On 24.06.16 at 17:01, <david.vrabel@citrix.com> wrote:
> On 07/06/16 07:31, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> - drop unused function parameter of read_dev_bar()
>> - drop rom_init() (now identical to bar_init())
>> - fold read_dev_bar() into its now single caller
>> - simplify determination of 64-bit memory resource
>> - use const and unsigned
> Please split this in 5 separate patches for easier review.
> Especially as often anyone writing "simplify" means "accidentally break".

So this is directly opposite of what Boris had asked for - originally
there were two patches, which I folded upon his request (and
which he gave his R-b for already). May I ask the two of you to
first settle on a consistent set of expectations to patches like this?


Xen-devel mailing list

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-06-27  7:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <5756857802000078000F268D@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
2016-06-07  6:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] xen-pciback: return proper values during BAR sizing Jan Beulich
2016-06-07  6:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] xen-pciback: clean up {bar,rom}_init() Jan Beulich
     [not found] ` <5756864102000078000F269A@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
2016-06-07 14:06   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] xen-pciback: return proper values during BAR sizing Boris Ostrovsky
     [not found]   ` <5756D4F4.7070802@oracle.com>
2016-06-07 14:14     ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-24  9:13   ` [PATCH v3 " Jan Beulich
     [not found]   ` <576D15DE02000078000F8678@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
2016-06-24 14:08     ` David Vrabel
     [not found] ` <5756866F02000078000F269D@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
2016-06-07 14:06   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] xen-pciback: clean up {bar, rom}_init() Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-24 15:01   ` David Vrabel
     [not found]   ` <576D4B59.9070906@citrix.com>
2016-06-27  7:24     ` Jan Beulich [this message]
     [not found]     ` <5770F0CF02000078000F8DD3@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
2016-06-29 12:42       ` David Vrabel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='5770F0CF02000078000F8DD3__11195.3474850909$1467012344$gmane$org@prv-mh.provo.novell.com' \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=JGross@suse.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).