From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Jennifer Herbert <jennifer.herbert@citrix.com>,
Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv1] xen/evtchn: add IOCTL_EVTCHN_RESTRICT
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 17:44:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5783CCEB.9020106@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c41cd65c-b7be-2bc6-d402-8f80206939cc@citrix.com>
On 11/07/16 17:33, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 11/07/16 17:15, David Vrabel wrote:
>> On 11/07/16 16:31, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> On 07/11/2016 10:57 AM, David Vrabel wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/xen/evtchn.h b/include/uapi/xen/evtchn.h
>>>> index 14e833ee4..f057b53 100644
>>>> --- a/include/uapi/xen/evtchn.h
>>>> +++ b/include/uapi/xen/evtchn.h
>>>> @@ -85,4 +85,19 @@ struct ioctl_evtchn_notify {
>>>> #define IOCTL_EVTCHN_RESET \
>>>> _IOC(_IOC_NONE, 'E', 5, 0)
>>>>
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Restrict this file descriptor so that it can only be used to bind
>>>> + * new interdomain events from one domain.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Once a file descriptor has been restricted it cannot be
>>>> + * de-restricted, and must be closed and re-opened. Event channels
>>>> + * which were bound before restricting remain bound afterwards, and
>>>> + * can be notified as usual.
>>>> + */
>>>> +#define IOCTL_EVTCHN_RESTRICT_DOMID \
>>>> + _IOC(_IOC_NONE, 'E', 100, sizeof(struct ioctl_evtchn_restrict_domid))
>>> Is there a reason why you picked 100 and not 6?
>> Because we've had this patch for years in xenserver like this and I
>> didn't see any need to change the ABI. But if it's preferred I can make
>> this 6 (and manage the transition internally).
>
> This should become 6, and we manage the transition. It is not like its
> hard to manage.
Ok.
David
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-11 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-11 14:57 [PATCHv1] xen/evtchn: add IOCTL_EVTCHN_RESTRICT David Vrabel
2016-07-11 15:31 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-07-11 16:15 ` David Vrabel
2016-07-11 16:33 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-07-11 16:44 ` David Vrabel [this message]
2016-07-11 16:55 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-08-01 11:15 ` Jan Beulich
2016-08-01 12:58 ` David Vrabel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5783CCEB.9020106@citrix.com \
--to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=jennifer.herbert@citrix.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).