From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> To: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org> Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com> Subject: [PATCH 4/9] x86/IRQ: desc->affinity should strictly represent the requested value Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 05:24:39 -0600 [thread overview] Message-ID: <5CC6DEF70200007800229EA3@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <5CC6DD090200007800229E80@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> desc->arch.cpu_mask reflects the actual set of target CPUs. Don't ever fiddle with desc->affinity itself, except to store caller requested values. This renders both set_native_irq_info() uses (which weren't using proper locking anyway) redundant - drop the function altogether. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> --- a/xen/arch/x86/io_apic.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/io_apic.c @@ -1042,7 +1042,6 @@ static void __init setup_IO_APIC_irqs(vo SET_DEST(entry, logical, cpu_mask_to_apicid(TARGET_CPUS)); spin_lock_irqsave(&ioapic_lock, flags); __ioapic_write_entry(apic, pin, 0, entry); - set_native_irq_info(irq, TARGET_CPUS); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ioapic_lock, flags); } } @@ -2251,7 +2250,6 @@ int io_apic_set_pci_routing (int ioapic, spin_lock_irqsave(&ioapic_lock, flags); __ioapic_write_entry(ioapic, pin, 0, entry); - set_native_irq_info(irq, TARGET_CPUS); spin_unlock(&ioapic_lock); spin_lock(&desc->lock); --- a/xen/arch/x86/irq.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/irq.c @@ -572,11 +572,16 @@ int assign_irq_vector(int irq, const cpu spin_lock_irqsave(&vector_lock, flags); ret = __assign_irq_vector(irq, desc, mask ?: TARGET_CPUS); - if (!ret) { + if ( !ret ) + { ret = desc->arch.vector; - cpumask_copy(desc->affinity, desc->arch.cpu_mask); + if ( mask ) + cpumask_copy(desc->affinity, mask); + else + cpumask_setall(desc->affinity); } spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vector_lock, flags); + return ret; } @@ -2318,9 +2323,10 @@ static void dump_irqs(unsigned char key) spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags); - printk(" IRQ:%4d aff:%*pb vec:%02x %-15s status=%03x ", - irq, nr_cpu_ids, cpumask_bits(desc->affinity), desc->arch.vector, - desc->handler->typename, desc->status); + printk(" IRQ:%4d aff:%*pb/%*pb vec:%02x %-15s status=%03x ", + irq, nr_cpu_ids, cpumask_bits(desc->affinity), + nr_cpu_ids, cpumask_bits(desc->arch.cpu_mask), + desc->arch.vector, desc->handler->typename, desc->status); if ( ssid ) printk("Z=%-25s ", ssid); @@ -2408,8 +2414,7 @@ void fixup_irqs(const cpumask_t *mask, b release_old_vec(desc); } - cpumask_copy(&affinity, desc->affinity); - if ( !desc->action || cpumask_subset(&affinity, mask) ) + if ( !desc->action || cpumask_subset(desc->affinity, mask) ) { spin_unlock(&desc->lock); continue; @@ -2433,12 +2438,13 @@ void fixup_irqs(const cpumask_t *mask, b desc->arch.move_in_progress = 0; } - cpumask_and(&affinity, &affinity, mask); - if ( cpumask_empty(&affinity) ) + if ( !cpumask_intersects(mask, desc->affinity) ) { break_affinity = true; - cpumask_copy(&affinity, mask); + cpumask_setall(&affinity); } + else + cpumask_copy(&affinity, desc->affinity); if ( desc->handler->disable ) desc->handler->disable(desc); --- a/xen/include/xen/irq.h +++ b/xen/include/xen/irq.h @@ -162,11 +162,6 @@ extern irq_desc_t *domain_spin_lock_irq_ extern irq_desc_t *pirq_spin_lock_irq_desc( const struct pirq *, unsigned long *pflags); -static inline void set_native_irq_info(unsigned int irq, const cpumask_t *mask) -{ - cpumask_copy(irq_to_desc(irq)->affinity, mask); -} - unsigned int set_desc_affinity(struct irq_desc *, const cpumask_t *); #ifndef arch_hwdom_irqs _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> To: "xen-devel" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org> Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com> Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/9] x86/IRQ: desc->affinity should strictly represent the requested value Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 05:24:39 -0600 [thread overview] Message-ID: <5CC6DEF70200007800229EA3@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> (raw) Message-ID: <20190429112439.N4rS0mc-YqOhaiuAq2XUw4bDaCagQJXEA7kyU0o6fEA@z> (raw) In-Reply-To: <5CC6DD090200007800229E80@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> desc->arch.cpu_mask reflects the actual set of target CPUs. Don't ever fiddle with desc->affinity itself, except to store caller requested values. This renders both set_native_irq_info() uses (which weren't using proper locking anyway) redundant - drop the function altogether. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> --- a/xen/arch/x86/io_apic.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/io_apic.c @@ -1042,7 +1042,6 @@ static void __init setup_IO_APIC_irqs(vo SET_DEST(entry, logical, cpu_mask_to_apicid(TARGET_CPUS)); spin_lock_irqsave(&ioapic_lock, flags); __ioapic_write_entry(apic, pin, 0, entry); - set_native_irq_info(irq, TARGET_CPUS); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ioapic_lock, flags); } } @@ -2251,7 +2250,6 @@ int io_apic_set_pci_routing (int ioapic, spin_lock_irqsave(&ioapic_lock, flags); __ioapic_write_entry(ioapic, pin, 0, entry); - set_native_irq_info(irq, TARGET_CPUS); spin_unlock(&ioapic_lock); spin_lock(&desc->lock); --- a/xen/arch/x86/irq.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/irq.c @@ -572,11 +572,16 @@ int assign_irq_vector(int irq, const cpu spin_lock_irqsave(&vector_lock, flags); ret = __assign_irq_vector(irq, desc, mask ?: TARGET_CPUS); - if (!ret) { + if ( !ret ) + { ret = desc->arch.vector; - cpumask_copy(desc->affinity, desc->arch.cpu_mask); + if ( mask ) + cpumask_copy(desc->affinity, mask); + else + cpumask_setall(desc->affinity); } spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vector_lock, flags); + return ret; } @@ -2318,9 +2323,10 @@ static void dump_irqs(unsigned char key) spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags); - printk(" IRQ:%4d aff:%*pb vec:%02x %-15s status=%03x ", - irq, nr_cpu_ids, cpumask_bits(desc->affinity), desc->arch.vector, - desc->handler->typename, desc->status); + printk(" IRQ:%4d aff:%*pb/%*pb vec:%02x %-15s status=%03x ", + irq, nr_cpu_ids, cpumask_bits(desc->affinity), + nr_cpu_ids, cpumask_bits(desc->arch.cpu_mask), + desc->arch.vector, desc->handler->typename, desc->status); if ( ssid ) printk("Z=%-25s ", ssid); @@ -2408,8 +2414,7 @@ void fixup_irqs(const cpumask_t *mask, b release_old_vec(desc); } - cpumask_copy(&affinity, desc->affinity); - if ( !desc->action || cpumask_subset(&affinity, mask) ) + if ( !desc->action || cpumask_subset(desc->affinity, mask) ) { spin_unlock(&desc->lock); continue; @@ -2433,12 +2438,13 @@ void fixup_irqs(const cpumask_t *mask, b desc->arch.move_in_progress = 0; } - cpumask_and(&affinity, &affinity, mask); - if ( cpumask_empty(&affinity) ) + if ( !cpumask_intersects(mask, desc->affinity) ) { break_affinity = true; - cpumask_copy(&affinity, mask); + cpumask_setall(&affinity); } + else + cpumask_copy(&affinity, desc->affinity); if ( desc->handler->disable ) desc->handler->disable(desc); --- a/xen/include/xen/irq.h +++ b/xen/include/xen/irq.h @@ -162,11 +162,6 @@ extern irq_desc_t *domain_spin_lock_irq_ extern irq_desc_t *pirq_spin_lock_irq_desc( const struct pirq *, unsigned long *pflags); -static inline void set_native_irq_info(unsigned int irq, const cpumask_t *mask) -{ - cpumask_copy(irq_to_desc(irq)->affinity, mask); -} - unsigned int set_desc_affinity(struct irq_desc *, const cpumask_t *); #ifndef arch_hwdom_irqs _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-29 11:24 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 196+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-04-29 11:16 [PATCH 0/9] x86: IRQ management adjustments Jan Beulich 2019-04-29 11:16 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-04-29 11:22 ` [PATCH RFC 1/9] x86/IRQ: deal with move-in-progress state in fixup_irqs() Jan Beulich 2019-04-29 11:22 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-04-29 12:55 ` Jan Beulich 2019-04-29 12:55 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-04-29 13:08 ` Jan Beulich 2019-04-29 13:08 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-04-29 11:23 ` [PATCH 2/9] x86/IRQ: deal with move cleanup count " Jan Beulich 2019-04-29 11:23 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-03 15:21 ` Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-03 15:21 ` [Xen-devel] " Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-06 7:44 ` Jan Beulich 2019-05-06 7:44 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-07 7:28 ` Jan Beulich 2019-05-07 7:28 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-07 8:12 ` Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-07 8:12 ` [Xen-devel] " Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-07 9:28 ` Jan Beulich 2019-05-07 9:28 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-04-29 11:23 ` [PATCH 3/9] x86/IRQ: improve dump_irqs() Jan Beulich 2019-04-29 11:23 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-03 15:43 ` Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-03 15:43 ` [Xen-devel] " Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-06 8:06 ` Jan Beulich 2019-05-06 8:06 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-04-29 11:24 ` Jan Beulich [this message] 2019-04-29 11:24 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/9] x86/IRQ: desc->affinity should strictly represent the requested value Jan Beulich 2019-05-03 16:21 ` Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-03 16:21 ` [Xen-devel] " Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-06 8:14 ` Jan Beulich 2019-05-06 8:14 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-04-29 11:25 ` [PATCH 5/9] x86/IRQ: fix locking around vector management Jan Beulich 2019-04-29 11:25 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-06 11:48 ` Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-06 11:48 ` [Xen-devel] " Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-06 13:06 ` Jan Beulich 2019-05-06 13:06 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-04-29 11:25 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86/IRQ: reduce unused space in struct arch_irq_desc Jan Beulich 2019-04-29 11:25 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-04-29 11:46 ` Andrew Cooper 2019-04-29 11:46 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrew Cooper 2019-04-29 11:26 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/IRQ: drop redundant cpumask_empty() from move_masked_irq() Jan Beulich 2019-04-29 11:26 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-06 13:39 ` Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-06 13:39 ` [Xen-devel] " Roger Pau Monné 2019-04-29 11:26 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86/IRQ: make fixup_irqs() skip unconnected internally used interrupts Jan Beulich 2019-04-29 11:26 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-06 13:52 ` Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-06 13:52 ` [Xen-devel] " Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-06 14:25 ` Jan Beulich 2019-05-06 14:25 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-06 14:37 ` Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-06 14:37 ` [Xen-devel] " Roger Pau Monné 2019-04-29 11:27 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86/IO-APIC: drop an unused variable from setup_IO_APIC_irqs() Jan Beulich 2019-04-29 11:27 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-04-29 11:40 ` Andrew Cooper 2019-04-29 11:40 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrew Cooper 2019-04-29 15:40 ` [PATCH v1b 1/9] x86/IRQ: deal with move-in-progress state in fixup_irqs() Jan Beulich 2019-04-29 15:40 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-03 9:19 ` Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-03 9:19 ` [Xen-devel] " Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-03 14:10 ` Jan Beulich 2019-05-03 14:10 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-06 7:15 ` Jan Beulich 2019-05-06 7:15 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-06 14:28 ` Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-06 14:28 ` [Xen-devel] " Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-06 15:00 ` Jan Beulich 2019-05-06 15:00 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-08 12:59 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] x86: IRQ management adjustments Jan Beulich 2019-05-08 12:59 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-08 13:03 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] x86/IRQ: deal with move-in-progress state in fixup_irqs() Jan Beulich 2019-05-08 13:03 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-13 9:04 ` Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-13 9:04 ` [Xen-devel] " Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-13 9:09 ` Jan Beulich 2019-05-13 9:09 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-08 13:03 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] x86/IRQ: deal with move cleanup count " Jan Beulich 2019-05-08 13:03 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-08 13:07 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] x86/IRQ: avoid UB (or worse) in trace_irq_mask() Jan Beulich 2019-05-08 13:07 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-13 9:08 ` Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-13 9:08 ` [Xen-devel] " Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-13 10:42 ` George Dunlap 2019-05-13 10:42 ` [Xen-devel] " George Dunlap 2019-05-13 12:05 ` Jan Beulich 2019-05-13 12:05 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-08 13:08 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] x86/IRQ: improve dump_irqs() Jan Beulich 2019-05-08 13:08 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-08 13:09 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] x86/IRQ: desc->affinity should strictly represent the requested value Jan Beulich 2019-05-08 13:09 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-08 13:10 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] x86/IRQ: consolidate use of ->arch.cpu_mask Jan Beulich 2019-05-08 13:10 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-13 11:32 ` Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-13 11:32 ` [Xen-devel] " Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-13 15:21 ` Jan Beulich 2019-05-13 15:21 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-08 13:10 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] x86/IRQ: fix locking around vector management Jan Beulich 2019-05-08 13:10 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-08 13:16 ` Jan Beulich 2019-05-08 13:16 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-11 0:11 ` Tian, Kevin 2019-05-11 0:11 ` [Xen-devel] " Tian, Kevin 2019-05-13 13:48 ` Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-13 13:48 ` [Xen-devel] " Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-13 14:19 ` Jan Beulich 2019-05-13 14:19 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-13 14:45 ` Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-13 14:45 ` [Xen-devel] " Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-13 15:05 ` Jan Beulich 2019-05-13 15:05 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-08 13:11 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] x86/IRQs: correct/tighten vector check in _clear_irq_vector() Jan Beulich 2019-05-08 13:11 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-13 14:01 ` Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-13 14:01 ` [Xen-devel] " Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-08 13:12 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] x86/IRQ: make fixup_irqs() skip unconnected internally used interrupts Jan Beulich 2019-05-08 13:12 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-08 13:13 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] x86/IRQ: reduce unused space in struct arch_irq_desc Jan Beulich 2019-05-08 13:13 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-08 13:13 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] x86/IRQ: drop redundant cpumask_empty() from move_masked_irq() Jan Beulich 2019-05-08 13:13 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-08 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] x86/IRQ: simplify and rename pirq_acktype() Jan Beulich 2019-05-08 13:14 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-13 14:14 ` Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-13 14:14 ` [Xen-devel] " Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-17 10:39 ` [PATCH v3 00/15] x86: IRQ management adjustments Jan Beulich 2019-05-17 10:39 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-17 10:44 ` [PATCH v3 01/15] x86/IRQ: deal with move-in-progress state in fixup_irqs() Jan Beulich 2019-05-17 10:44 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-07-03 15:39 ` Andrew Cooper 2019-07-04 9:32 ` Jan Beulich 2019-05-17 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 02/15] x86/IRQ: deal with move cleanup count " Jan Beulich 2019-05-17 10:45 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-07-03 16:32 ` Andrew Cooper 2019-05-17 10:46 ` [PATCH v3 03/15] x86/IRQ: improve dump_irqs() Jan Beulich 2019-05-17 10:46 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-07-03 16:39 ` Andrew Cooper 2019-05-17 10:46 ` [PATCH v3 04/15] x86/IRQ: desc->affinity should strictly represent the requested value Jan Beulich 2019-05-17 10:46 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-07-03 17:58 ` Andrew Cooper 2019-07-04 9:37 ` Jan Beulich 2019-05-17 10:47 ` [PATCH v3 05/15] x86/IRQ: consolidate use of ->arch.cpu_mask Jan Beulich 2019-05-17 10:47 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-07-03 18:07 ` Andrew Cooper 2019-05-17 10:47 ` [PATCH v3 06/15] x86/IRQ: fix locking around vector management Jan Beulich 2019-05-17 10:47 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-07-03 18:23 ` Andrew Cooper 2019-07-04 9:54 ` Jan Beulich 2019-05-17 10:48 ` [PATCH v3 07/15] x86/IRQ: target online CPUs when binding guest IRQ Jan Beulich 2019-05-17 10:48 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-20 11:40 ` Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-20 11:40 ` [Xen-devel] " Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-20 15:17 ` Jan Beulich 2019-05-20 15:17 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-22 9:41 ` Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-22 9:41 ` [Xen-devel] " Roger Pau Monné 2019-07-03 18:30 ` Andrew Cooper 2019-05-17 10:49 ` [PATCH v3 08/15] x86/IRQs: correct/tighten vector check in _clear_irq_vector() Jan Beulich 2019-05-17 10:49 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-07-03 18:31 ` Andrew Cooper 2019-05-17 10:49 ` [PATCH v3 09/15] x86/IRQ: make fixup_irqs() skip unconnected internally used interrupts Jan Beulich 2019-05-17 10:49 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-07-03 18:36 ` Andrew Cooper 2019-05-17 10:50 ` [PATCH v3 10/15] x86/IRQ: drop redundant cpumask_empty() from move_masked_irq() Jan Beulich 2019-05-17 10:50 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-07-03 18:38 ` Andrew Cooper 2019-05-17 10:51 ` [PATCH v3 11/15] x86/IRQ: simplify and rename pirq_acktype() Jan Beulich 2019-05-17 10:51 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-07-03 18:39 ` Andrew Cooper 2019-05-17 10:51 ` [PATCH v3 12/15] x86/IRQ: add explicit tracing-enabled check to trace_irq_mask() Jan Beulich 2019-05-17 10:51 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-20 11:46 ` Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-20 11:46 ` [Xen-devel] " Roger Pau Monné 2019-07-03 18:41 ` Andrew Cooper 2019-07-04 10:01 ` Jan Beulich 2019-05-17 10:52 ` [PATCH v3 13/15] x86/IRQ: tighten vector checks Jan Beulich 2019-05-17 10:52 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-20 14:04 ` Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-20 14:04 ` [Xen-devel] " Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-20 15:26 ` Jan Beulich 2019-05-20 15:26 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-22 16:42 ` Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-22 16:42 ` [Xen-devel] " Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-23 8:36 ` Jan Beulich 2019-05-23 8:36 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-07-03 18:42 ` Andrew Cooper 2019-05-17 10:52 ` [PATCH v3 14/15] x86/IRQ: eliminate some on-stack cpumask_t instances Jan Beulich 2019-05-17 10:52 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-20 14:22 ` Roger Pau Monné 2019-05-20 14:22 ` [Xen-devel] " Roger Pau Monné 2019-07-03 18:44 ` Andrew Cooper 2019-07-04 10:04 ` Jan Beulich 2019-05-17 10:53 ` [PATCH v3 15/15] x86/IRQ: move {,_}clear_irq_vector() Jan Beulich 2019-05-17 10:53 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-07-03 18:45 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 15/15] x86/IRQ: move {, _}clear_irq_vector() Andrew Cooper
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=5CC6DEF70200007800229EA3@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com \ --to=jbeulich@suse.com \ --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \ --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \ --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \ --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).