xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
To: aisaila@bitdefender.com
Cc: Tamas K Lengyel <tamas@tklengyel.com>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
	Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@bitdefender.com>,
	George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	george.dunlap@citrix.com,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] x86/altp2m: Aggregate get entry and populate into common funcs
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 09:42:10 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5CDAE1D2020000780022ED04@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190423142959.12609-1-aisaila@bitdefender.com>

>>> On 23.04.19 at 16:30, <aisaila@bitdefender.com> wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
> @@ -478,6 +478,43 @@ void p2m_unlock_and_tlb_flush(struct p2m_domain *p2m)
>          mm_write_unlock(&p2m->lock);
>  }
>  
> +int altp2m_get_effective_entry(struct p2m_domain *ap2m, gfn_t gfn, mfn_t *mfn,
> +                               p2m_type_t *t, p2m_access_t *a,
> +                               bool prepopulate)
> +{
> +    *mfn = ap2m->get_entry(ap2m, gfn, t, a, 0, NULL, NULL);
> +
> +    /* Check host p2m if no valid entry in alternate */
> +    if ( !mfn_valid(*mfn) && !p2m_is_hostp2m(ap2m) )
> +    {
> +        struct p2m_domain *hp2m = p2m_get_hostp2m(ap2m->domain);
> +        unsigned int page_order;
> +        int rc;
> +
> +        *mfn = __get_gfn_type_access(hp2m, gfn_x(gfn), t, a,
> +                                     P2M_ALLOC | P2M_UNSHARE, &page_order, 0);
> +
> +        rc = -ESRCH;
> +        if ( !mfn_valid(*mfn) || *t != p2m_ram_rw )
> +            return rc;
> +
> +        /* If this is a superpage, copy that first */
> +        if ( prepopulate && page_order != PAGE_ORDER_4K )
> +        {
> +            unsigned long mask = ~((1UL << page_order) - 1);
> +            gfn_t gfn_aligned = _gfn(gfn_x(gfn) & mask);
> +            mfn_t mfn_aligned = _mfn(mfn_x(*mfn) & mask);
> +
> +            rc = ap2m->set_entry(ap2m, gfn_aligned, mfn_aligned, page_order, *t, *a, 1);
> +            if ( rc )
> +                return rc;
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    return 0;
> +}
> +
> +
>  mfn_t __get_gfn_type_access(struct p2m_domain *p2m, unsigned long gfn_l,
>                      p2m_type_t *t, p2m_access_t *a, p2m_query_t q,
>                      unsigned int *page_order, bool_t locked)

May I ask how the placement of this function was chosen? It looks
as if all its callers live inside #ifdef CONFIG_HVM sections, just this
function doesn't (reportedly causing build issues together with
later changes).

Jan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
To: <aisaila@bitdefender.com>
Cc: Tamas K Lengyel <tamas@tklengyel.com>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
	Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@bitdefender.com>,
	George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	george.dunlap@citrix.com,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6] x86/altp2m: Aggregate get entry and populate into common funcs
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 09:42:10 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5CDAE1D2020000780022ED04@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190514154210.RPta0eADkbUdXfJRS8RW9g0Gb5o9SsAUodijUIEudX0@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190423142959.12609-1-aisaila@bitdefender.com>

>>> On 23.04.19 at 16:30, <aisaila@bitdefender.com> wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
> @@ -478,6 +478,43 @@ void p2m_unlock_and_tlb_flush(struct p2m_domain *p2m)
>          mm_write_unlock(&p2m->lock);
>  }
>  
> +int altp2m_get_effective_entry(struct p2m_domain *ap2m, gfn_t gfn, mfn_t *mfn,
> +                               p2m_type_t *t, p2m_access_t *a,
> +                               bool prepopulate)
> +{
> +    *mfn = ap2m->get_entry(ap2m, gfn, t, a, 0, NULL, NULL);
> +
> +    /* Check host p2m if no valid entry in alternate */
> +    if ( !mfn_valid(*mfn) && !p2m_is_hostp2m(ap2m) )
> +    {
> +        struct p2m_domain *hp2m = p2m_get_hostp2m(ap2m->domain);
> +        unsigned int page_order;
> +        int rc;
> +
> +        *mfn = __get_gfn_type_access(hp2m, gfn_x(gfn), t, a,
> +                                     P2M_ALLOC | P2M_UNSHARE, &page_order, 0);
> +
> +        rc = -ESRCH;
> +        if ( !mfn_valid(*mfn) || *t != p2m_ram_rw )
> +            return rc;
> +
> +        /* If this is a superpage, copy that first */
> +        if ( prepopulate && page_order != PAGE_ORDER_4K )
> +        {
> +            unsigned long mask = ~((1UL << page_order) - 1);
> +            gfn_t gfn_aligned = _gfn(gfn_x(gfn) & mask);
> +            mfn_t mfn_aligned = _mfn(mfn_x(*mfn) & mask);
> +
> +            rc = ap2m->set_entry(ap2m, gfn_aligned, mfn_aligned, page_order, *t, *a, 1);
> +            if ( rc )
> +                return rc;
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    return 0;
> +}
> +
> +
>  mfn_t __get_gfn_type_access(struct p2m_domain *p2m, unsigned long gfn_l,
>                      p2m_type_t *t, p2m_access_t *a, p2m_query_t q,
>                      unsigned int *page_order, bool_t locked)

May I ask how the placement of this function was chosen? It looks
as if all its callers live inside #ifdef CONFIG_HVM sections, just this
function doesn't (reportedly causing build issues together with
later changes).

Jan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-14 15:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-23 14:30 [PATCH v6] x86/altp2m: Aggregate get entry and populate into common funcs Alexandru Stefan ISAILA
2019-04-23 14:30 ` [Xen-devel] " Alexandru Stefan ISAILA
2019-04-23 18:15 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2019-04-23 18:15   ` [Xen-devel] " Tamas K Lengyel
2019-04-29 14:53 ` Jan Beulich
2019-04-29 14:53   ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2019-04-30 10:22   ` Andrew Cooper
2019-04-30 10:22     ` [Xen-devel] " Andrew Cooper
2019-05-14 15:42 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2019-05-14 15:42   ` Jan Beulich
2019-05-14 16:16   ` Razvan Cojocaru
2019-05-14 16:16     ` [Xen-devel] " Razvan Cojocaru

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5CDAE1D2020000780022ED04@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=aisaila@bitdefender.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
    --cc=rcojocaru@bitdefender.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=tamas@tklengyel.com \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).