From: Tamas K Lengyel <tamas@tklengyel.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@bitdefender.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/8] x86/vm_event: Add HVM debug exception vm_events
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 15:46:47 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABfawhkG_DZCNFB4bZq4+M1KmSixgkVWm53V5ROZZOg7c=6_nw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <574D607A02000078000EFE0C@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 1:59 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>>>> On 30.05.16 at 22:13, <tamas@tklengyel.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 30.05.16 at 00:37, <tamas@tklengyel.com> wrote:
>>>> @@ -3393,8 +3409,9 @@ void vmx_vmexit_handler(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
>>>> }
>>>> else {
>>>> int handled =
>>>> - hvm_monitor_breakpoint(regs->eip,
>>>> - HVM_MONITOR_SOFTWARE_BREAKPOINT);
>>>> + hvm_monitor_debug(regs->eip,
>>>> + HVM_MONITOR_SOFTWARE_BREAKPOINT,
>>>> + X86_EVENTTYPE_SW_EXCEPTION, 1);
>>>
>>> Please let's not add further mistakes like this, assuming INT3 can't
>>> have any prefixes. It can, even if they're useless.
>>
>> You mean the instruction length is not necessarily 1? Ultimately it
>> doesn't seem to matter because reinjecting it with xc_hvm_inject_trap
>> ignores this field. Instruction length is only required to be properly
>> set AFAICT for a subset of debug exceptions during reinjection.
>
> As you suggest later in your reply, if the insn length really doesn't
> matter, this should be made recognizable here. Either by a suitably
> named manifest constant (which could then even evaluate to zero),
> or by a comment (personally I'd prefer the former, but I'm not
> maintainer of this code).
>
> Jan
Running Andrew's framework with xen-access monitoring breakpoints results in
xen-access:
Got event from Xen
Breakpoint: rip=00000000001032d1, gfn=103 (vcpu 0)
xl dmesg:
(d28) --- Xen Test Framework ---
(d28) Environment: HVM 64bit (Long mode 4 levels)
(d28) Trap emulation
(d28) Warning: FEP support not detected - some tests will be skipped
(d28) Test cpl0: all perms ok
(d28) Testing int3
(XEN) d28v0 VMRESUME error: 0x7
(XEN) domain_crash_sync called from vmcs.c:1599
(XEN) Domain 28 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#7:
(XEN) ----[ Xen-4.6.1 x86_64 debug=n Not tainted ]----
(XEN) CPU: 7
(XEN) RIP: 0008:[<00000000001032d1>]
(XEN) RFLAGS: 0000000000000046 CONTEXT: hvm guest (d28v0)
(XEN) rax: 00000000001032d2 rbx: 00000000001102b0 rcx: 0000000000000000
(XEN) rdx: 0000000000104af0 rsi: 0000000000000000 rdi: 0000000000000000
(XEN) rbp: 0000000000000001 rsp: 0000000000114f98 r8: 000000000000000f
(XEN) r9: 00000000000000ad r10: 000000000000000f r11: 0000000000000004
(XEN) r12: 0000000000000003 r13: 0000000000000000 r14: 0000000000000000
(XEN) r15: 0000000000000000 cr0: 0000000080000011 cr4: 0000000000000020
(XEN) cr3: 000000000010b000 cr2: 0000000000000000
(XEN) ds: 0033 es: 0033 fs: 0033 gs: 0033 ss: 0000 cs: 0008
This is likely because xen-access sets the instruction length to 0
during reinjection. If I change that to 1 the tests still fail but
without crashing the domain, output:
xen-access:
Got event from Xen
Breakpoint: rip=00000000001032d1, gfn=103 (vcpu 0)
Got event from Xen
Breakpoint: rip=00000000001032e1, gfn=103 (vcpu 0)
Got event from Xen
Breakpoint: rip=00000000001032e2, gfn=103 (vcpu 0)
Got event from Xen
Breakpoint: rip=00000000001032d1, gfn=103 (vcpu 0)
Got event from Xen
Breakpoint: rip=00000000001032e1, gfn=103 (vcpu 0)
Got event from Xen
Breakpoint: rip=00000000001032d1, gfn=103 (vcpu 0)
Got event from Xen
Breakpoint: rip=00000000001032e1, gfn=103 (vcpu 0)
Got event from Xen
Breakpoint: rip=00000000001032e2, gfn=103 (vcpu 0)
Got event from Xen
Breakpoint: rip=00000000001032d1, gfn=103 (vcpu 0)
Got event from Xen
Breakpoint: rip=00000000001032e1, gfn=103 (vcpu 0)
Got event from Xen
Breakpoint: rip=00000000001032d1, gfn=103 (vcpu 0)
Got event from Xen
Breakpoint: rip=00000000001032e1, gfn=103 (vcpu 0)
xl dmesg:
(d30) Environment: HVM 64bit (Long mode 4 levels)
(d30) Trap emulation
(d30) Warning: FEP support not detected - some tests will be skipped
(d30) Test cpl0: all perms ok
(d30) Testing int3
(d30) Fail redundant: Expected 1 exception (vec 3 at 00000000001032e3), got 2
(d30) exlog[00] 0008:00000000001032e2 vec 3[0000]
(d30) exlog[01] 0008:00000000001032e3 vec 3[0000]
(d30) Testing int $3
(d30) Testing icebp
(d30) Testing int $1
(d30) Testing into
(d30) Test cpl0: p=0
(d30) Testing int3
(d30) Testing int $3
(d30) Testing icebp
(d30) Testing int $1
(d30) Testing into
(d30) Test cpl3: all perms ok
(d30) Testing int3
(d30) Fail redundant: Expected 1 exception (vec 3 at 00000000001032e3), got 2
(d30) exlog[00] 0023:00000000001032e2 vec 3[0000]
(d30) exlog[01] 0023:00000000001032e3 vec 3[0000]
(d30) Testing int $3
(d30) Testing icebp
(d30) Testing int $1
(d30) Testing into
(d30) Test cpl3: p=0
(d30) Testing int3
(d30) Testing int $3
(d30) Testing icebp
(d30) Testing int $1
(d30) Testing into
(d30) Test cpl3: dpl=0
(d30) Testing int3
(d30) Testing int $3
(d30) Testing icebp
(d30) Testing int $1
(d30) Testing into
(d30) Test result: FAILURE
So we _should be_ sending the instruction length information along for
this type of vm_events and it is in fact buggy right now.
Tamas
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-01 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-29 22:37 [PATCH v4 1/8] monitor: Rename vm_event_monitor_get_capabilities Tamas K Lengyel
2016-05-29 22:37 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] monitor: Rename vm_event_monitor_guest_request Tamas K Lengyel
2016-05-30 7:05 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-05-30 13:51 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-29 22:37 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] monitor: Rename hvm/event to hvm/monitor Tamas K Lengyel
2016-05-30 7:08 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-05-30 13:53 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-29 22:37 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] monitor: ARM SMC events Tamas K Lengyel
2016-06-01 11:37 ` Julien Grall
[not found] ` <CABfawhmO9tUG3-OcorfwqdOgZTkjoUk+u=dHySGonBDvobqyKw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CABfawhmK2GAmQqZMhrgjYzeUZ_XaoyRUPuJxyPK5LJEHwsp5SA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CABfawh=J1fwinTYKGvJNrFPOsGLSXz6U3GE8fxPz3-KsXSWfbQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CABfawhn7zvE=hn0hq1ryH+sW-jdkAXgZM1C2KxwZVUE8pbp8cQ@mail.gmail.com>
2016-06-01 15:41 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-06-02 14:23 ` Julien Grall
2016-06-02 22:31 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-07-04 19:13 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-07-04 20:02 ` Julien Grall
2016-07-04 21:05 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-07-05 9:58 ` Julien Grall
2016-05-29 22:37 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] arm/vm_event: get/set registers Tamas K Lengyel
2016-05-30 7:09 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-05-30 11:50 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-30 19:47 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-05-30 20:20 ` Julien Grall
2016-05-30 20:37 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-05-30 20:46 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-05-30 20:53 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-05-30 21:35 ` Julien Grall
2016-05-30 21:41 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-05-31 7:54 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-31 8:06 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-05-31 8:30 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-31 16:20 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-05-31 7:48 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-31 16:28 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-06-01 8:41 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-01 11:24 ` Julien Grall
2016-06-01 18:21 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-06-01 19:34 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-06-01 19:43 ` Julien Grall
2016-06-02 7:35 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-02 8:26 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-06-02 9:38 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-02 9:42 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-06-01 19:38 ` Julien Grall
2016-06-01 19:49 ` Julien Grall
2016-06-01 19:50 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-05-29 22:37 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] tools/libxc: add xc_monitor_privileged_call Tamas K Lengyel
2016-05-29 22:37 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] tools/xen-access: add test-case for ARM SMC Tamas K Lengyel
2016-05-30 9:56 ` Wei Liu
2016-05-29 22:37 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] x86/vm_event: Add HVM debug exception vm_events Tamas K Lengyel
2016-05-30 7:29 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-05-30 14:16 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-30 20:13 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-05-30 20:58 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-05-31 7:59 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-01 21:46 ` Tamas K Lengyel [this message]
2016-06-01 22:17 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-06-02 0:01 ` Tamas K Lengyel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CABfawhkG_DZCNFB4bZq4+M1KmSixgkVWm53V5ROZZOg7c=6_nw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=tamas@tklengyel.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=rcojocaru@bitdefender.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).