From: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> To: konrad.wilk@oracle.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, jgross@suse.com Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Julien.Grall@arm.com, sstabellini@kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] xen/swiotlb: don't initialize swiotlb twice on arm64 Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 16:26:24 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview] Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1905221622190.20440@sstabellini-ThinkPad-T480s> (raw) From: Stefano Stabellini <stefanos@xilinx.com> On arm64 swiotlb is already initialized by mem_init. We don't want to initialize it twice, the memory is already allocated. Detect this condition in swiotlb-xen and skip the second initialization. Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefanos@xilinx.com> --- There are other issues which I found recently affecting the swiotlb on arm64 -- I'll send the other patches separately. diff --git a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c index 877baf2..8fcda2bf4 100644 --- a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c +++ b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c @@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ int __ref xen_swiotlb_init(int verbose, bool early) int rc = -ENOMEM; enum xen_swiotlb_err m_ret = XEN_SWIOTLB_UNKNOWN; unsigned int repeat = 3; + bool pre_initialized = false; xen_io_tlb_nslabs = swiotlb_nr_tbl(); retry: @@ -214,7 +215,10 @@ int __ref xen_swiotlb_init(int verbose, bool early) /* * Get IO TLB memory from any location. */ - if (early) { + if (io_tlb_start != 0) { + xen_io_tlb_start = phys_to_virt(io_tlb_start); + pre_initialized = true; + } else if (early) { xen_io_tlb_start = memblock_alloc(PAGE_ALIGN(bytes), PAGE_SIZE); if (!xen_io_tlb_start) @@ -264,7 +268,7 @@ int __ref xen_swiotlb_init(int verbose, bool early) verbose)) panic("Cannot allocate SWIOTLB buffer"); rc = 0; - } else + } else if (!pre_initialized) rc = swiotlb_late_init_with_tbl(xen_io_tlb_start, xen_io_tlb_nslabs); if (!rc) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> To: konrad.wilk@oracle.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, jgross@suse.com Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Julien.Grall@arm.com, sstabellini@kernel.org Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/swiotlb: don't initialize swiotlb twice on arm64 Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 16:26:24 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview] Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1905221622190.20440@sstabellini-ThinkPad-T480s> (raw) Message-ID: <20190522232624.OSqno9ILJBy9WhF-lQrfBf0qB7KIlhmRl7SyILj2fm0@z> (raw) From: Stefano Stabellini <stefanos@xilinx.com> On arm64 swiotlb is already initialized by mem_init. We don't want to initialize it twice, the memory is already allocated. Detect this condition in swiotlb-xen and skip the second initialization. Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefanos@xilinx.com> --- There are other issues which I found recently affecting the swiotlb on arm64 -- I'll send the other patches separately. diff --git a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c index 877baf2..8fcda2bf4 100644 --- a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c +++ b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c @@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ int __ref xen_swiotlb_init(int verbose, bool early) int rc = -ENOMEM; enum xen_swiotlb_err m_ret = XEN_SWIOTLB_UNKNOWN; unsigned int repeat = 3; + bool pre_initialized = false; xen_io_tlb_nslabs = swiotlb_nr_tbl(); retry: @@ -214,7 +215,10 @@ int __ref xen_swiotlb_init(int verbose, bool early) /* * Get IO TLB memory from any location. */ - if (early) { + if (io_tlb_start != 0) { + xen_io_tlb_start = phys_to_virt(io_tlb_start); + pre_initialized = true; + } else if (early) { xen_io_tlb_start = memblock_alloc(PAGE_ALIGN(bytes), PAGE_SIZE); if (!xen_io_tlb_start) @@ -264,7 +268,7 @@ int __ref xen_swiotlb_init(int verbose, bool early) verbose)) panic("Cannot allocate SWIOTLB buffer"); rc = 0; - } else + } else if (!pre_initialized) rc = swiotlb_late_init_with_tbl(xen_io_tlb_start, xen_io_tlb_nslabs); if (!rc) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
next reply other threads:[~2019-05-22 23:26 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-05-22 23:26 Stefano Stabellini [this message] 2019-05-22 23:26 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/swiotlb: don't initialize swiotlb twice on arm64 Stefano Stabellini 2019-05-23 8:54 ` Julien Grall 2019-05-23 8:54 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall 2019-05-28 22:48 ` Stefano Stabellini 2019-05-28 22:48 ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.21.1905221622190.20440@sstabellini-ThinkPad-T480s \ --to=sstabellini@kernel.org \ --cc=Julien.Grall@arm.com \ --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \ --cc=jgross@suse.com \ --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \ --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).