xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	"Wei Liu" <wl@xen.org>, "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 02/10] libx86: Proactively initialise error pointers
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 17:46:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ba924285-8a78-6b70-0591-05629317ee29@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <65f18521-15c5-72a9-29f6-cd5d621e1283@citrix.com>

On 16.09.2019 17:26, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 16/09/2019 11:56, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 13.09.2019 21:27, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> --- a/tools/tests/cpu-policy/test-cpu-policy.c
>>> +++ b/tools/tests/cpu-policy/test-cpu-policy.c
>>> @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ static void test_cpuid_deserialise_failure(void)
>>>      for ( size_t i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); ++i )
>>>      {
>>>          const struct test *t = &tests[i];
>>> -        uint32_t err_leaf = ~0u, err_subleaf = ~0u;
>>> +        uint32_t err_leaf, err_subleaf;
>>>          int rc;
>>>  
>>>          /* No writes should occur.  Use NULL to catch errors. */
>>> @@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ static void test_msr_deserialise_failure(void)
>>>      for ( size_t i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); ++i )
>>>      {
>>>          const struct test *t = &tests[i];
>>> -        uint32_t err_msr = ~0u;
>>> +        uint32_t err_msr;
>> I continue to be curious about the ~0u => ...
>>
>>> --- a/xen/lib/x86/cpuid.c
>>> +++ b/xen/lib/x86/cpuid.c
>>> @@ -381,6 +381,11 @@ int x86_cpuid_copy_from_buffer(struct cpuid_policy *p,
>>>      unsigned int i;
>>>      xen_cpuid_leaf_t data;
>>>  
>>> +    if ( err_leaf )
>>> +        *err_leaf = -1;
>>> +    if ( err_subleaf )
>>> +        *err_subleaf = -1;
>>> +
>>>      /*
>>>       * A well formed caller is expected to pass an array with leaves in order,
>>>       * and without any repetitions.  However, due to per-vendor differences,
>>> --- a/xen/lib/x86/msr.c
>>> +++ b/xen/lib/x86/msr.c
>>> @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ int x86_msr_copy_from_buffer(struct msr_policy *p,
>>>      xen_msr_entry_t data;
>>>      int rc;
>>>  
>>> +    if ( err_msr )
>>> +        *err_msr = -1;
>> ... => -1 switch.
> 
> Its shorter to write, and less buggy when the type changes.
> 
> Any reason why this email is in private?

None at all - I have no idea how xen-devel managed to disappear
from the recipients list (I've re-added it now).

Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-09-16 15:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-13 19:27 [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 00/10] x86/cpuid: Switch to using XEN_DOMCTL_set_cpumsr_policy Andrew Cooper
2019-09-13 19:27 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 01/10] x86/msr: Offer CPUID Faulting to PVH control domains Andrew Cooper
2019-09-16 10:53   ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-13 19:27 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 02/10] libx86: Proactively initialise error pointers Andrew Cooper
     [not found]   ` <527f33ad-3de1-15c7-eb4b-603eaf65f3c5@suse.com>
     [not found]     ` <65f18521-15c5-72a9-29f6-cd5d621e1283@citrix.com>
2019-09-16 15:46       ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2019-09-13 19:27 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 03/10] libx86: Introduce x86_cpu_policies_are_compatible() Andrew Cooper
2019-09-16 10:59   ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-16 15:31     ` Andrew Cooper
2019-09-13 19:27 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 04/10] x86/cpuid: Split update_domain_cpuid_info() in half Andrew Cooper
2019-09-13 19:27 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 05/10] x86/domctl: Implement XEN_DOMCTL_set_cpumsr_policy Andrew Cooper
2019-09-16 11:04   ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-16 15:40     ` Andrew Cooper
2019-09-13 19:27 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 06/10] tools/libxc: Pre-cleanup for xc_cpuid_{set, apply_policy}() Andrew Cooper
2019-09-16 11:09   ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-16 15:42     ` Andrew Cooper
2019-09-13 19:27 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 07/10] tools/libxc: Rework xc_cpuid_set() to use {get, set}_cpu_policy() Andrew Cooper
2019-09-13 19:27 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 08/10] tools/libxc: Rework xc_cpuid_apply_policy() " Andrew Cooper
2019-09-16 11:17   ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-16 13:41     ` Wei Liu
2019-09-16 15:49     ` Andrew Cooper
2019-09-16 16:05       ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-18 16:09   ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-19  8:48     ` Andrew Cooper
2019-09-25 18:11   ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 " Andrew Cooper
2019-09-26  8:04     ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-26 12:25       ` Andrew Cooper
2019-09-13 19:27 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 09/10] x86/domctl: Drop XEN_DOMCTL_set_cpuid Andrew Cooper
2019-09-13 19:27 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 10/10] x86/cpuid: Enable CPUID Faulting for PV control domains by default Andrew Cooper
2019-09-16 11:22   ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-16 15:52     ` Andrew Cooper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ba924285-8a78-6b70-0591-05629317ee29@suse.com \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=wl@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).