From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
"Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>, "Wei Liu" <wl@xen.org>
Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/7] x86emul: (mainly) vendor specific behavior adjustments
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:18:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cfeb8fcf-3ba6-674c-17a9-93be9e746930@suse.com> (raw)
There are quite a few more vendor differences than we currently support,
in particular in 64-bit mode. Now that I've made some progress on the
binutils side I felt more confident in making the changes here as well.
1: add wrappers to check for AMD-like behavior
2: vendor specific near RET behavior in 64-bit mode
3: vendor specific direct branch behavior in 64-bit mode
4: vendor specific near indirect branch behavior in 64-bit mode
5: vendor specific SYSENTER/SYSEXIT behavior in long mode
6: vendor specific SYSCALL behavior
7: support SYSRET
Jan
next reply other threads:[~2020-03-24 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-24 16:18 Jan Beulich [this message]
2020-03-24 16:26 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/7] x86emul: add wrappers to check for AMD-like behavior Jan Beulich
2020-03-25 13:26 ` Andrew Cooper
2020-03-24 16:26 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/7] x86emul: vendor specific near RET behavior in 64-bit mode Jan Beulich
2020-03-25 13:36 ` Andrew Cooper
2020-03-24 16:27 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/7] x86emul: vendor specific direct branch " Jan Beulich
2020-03-25 14:10 ` Andrew Cooper
2020-03-24 16:27 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/7] x86emul: vendor specific near indirect " Jan Beulich
2020-03-25 14:11 ` Andrew Cooper
2020-03-24 16:28 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/7] x86emul: vendor specific SYSENTER/SYSEXIT behavior in long mode Jan Beulich
2020-03-25 14:15 ` Andrew Cooper
2020-03-24 16:28 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 6/7] x86emul: vendor specific SYSCALL behavior Jan Beulich
2020-03-25 9:44 ` Andrew Cooper
2020-03-24 16:29 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 7/7] x86emul: support SYSRET Jan Beulich
2020-03-25 10:00 ` Andrew Cooper
2020-03-25 10:19 ` Jan Beulich
2020-03-25 10:47 ` Andrew Cooper
2020-03-25 11:55 ` Jan Beulich
2020-03-25 12:25 ` Andrew Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cfeb8fcf-3ba6-674c-17a9-93be9e746930@suse.com \
--to=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=wl@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).