From: Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>
To: Penny Zheng <penny.zheng@arm.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, sstabellini@kernel.org
Cc: Bertrand.Marquis@arm.com, Wei.Chen@arm.com, nd@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] xen/arm: introduce domain on Static Allocation
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 09:58:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e1b90f06-92d2-11da-c556-4081907124b8@xen.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210518052113.725808-2-penny.zheng@arm.com>
Hi Penny,
On 18/05/2021 06:21, Penny Zheng wrote:
> Static Allocation refers to system or sub-system(domains) for which memory
> areas are pre-defined by configuration using physical address ranges.
> Those pre-defined memory, -- Static Momery, as parts of RAM reserved in the
s/Momery/Memory/
> beginning, shall never go to heap allocator or boot allocator for any use.
>
> Domains on Static Allocation is supported through device tree property
> `xen,static-mem` specifying reserved RAM banks as this domain's guest RAM.
> By default, they shall be mapped to the fixed guest RAM address
> `GUEST_RAM0_BASE`, `GUEST_RAM1_BASE`.
>
> This patch introduces this new `xen,static-mem` property to define static
> memory nodes in device tree file.
> This patch also documents and parses this new attribute at boot time and
> stores related info in static_mem for later initialization.
>
> Signed-off-by: Penny Zheng <penny.zheng@arm.com>
> ---
> docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt | 33 +++++++++++++++++
> xen/arch/arm/bootfdt.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> xen/include/asm-arm/setup.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 87 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt b/docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt
> index 5243bc7fd3..d209149d71 100644
> --- a/docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt
> +++ b/docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt
> @@ -268,3 +268,36 @@ The DTB fragment is loaded at 0xc000000 in the example above. It should
> follow the convention explained in docs/misc/arm/passthrough.txt. The
> DTB fragment will be added to the guest device tree, so that the guest
> kernel will be able to discover the device.
> +
> +
> +Static Allocation
> +=============
> +
> +Static Allocation refers to system or sub-system(domains) for which memory
> +areas are pre-defined by configuration using physical address ranges.
> +Those pre-defined memory, -- Static Momery, as parts of RAM reserved in the
s/Momery/Memory/
> +beginning, shall never go to heap allocator or boot allocator for any use.
> +
> +Domains on Static Allocation is supported through device tree property
> +`xen,static-mem` specifying reserved RAM banks as this domain's guest RAM.
I would suggest to use "physical RAM" when you refer to the host memory.
> +By default, they shall be mapped to the fixed guest RAM address
> +`GUEST_RAM0_BASE`, `GUEST_RAM1_BASE`.
There are a few bits that needs to clarified or part of the description:
1) "By default" suggests there is an alternative possibility.
However, I don't see any.
2) Will the first region of xen,static-mem be mapped to
GUEST_RAM0_BASE and the second to GUEST_RAM1_BASE? What if a third
region is specificed?
3) We don't guarantee the base address and the size of the banks.
Wouldn't it be better to let the admin select the region he/she wants?
4) How do you determine the number of cells for the address and the size?
> +Static Allocation is only supported on AArch64 for now.
The code doesn't seem to be AArch64 specific. So why can't this be used
for 32-bit Arm?
> +
> +The dtb property should look like as follows:
> +
> + chosen {
> + domU1 {
> + compatible = "xen,domain";
> + #address-cells = <0x2>;
> + #size-cells = <0x2>;
> + cpus = <2>;
> + xen,static-mem = <0x0 0x30000000 0x0 0x20000000>;
> +
> + ...
> + };
> + };
> +
> +DOMU1 on Static Allocation has reserved RAM bank at 0x30000000 of 512MB size
Do you mean "DomU1 will have a static memory of 512MB reserved from the
physical address..."?
> +as guest RAM.
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/bootfdt.c b/xen/arch/arm/bootfdt.c
> index dcff512648..e9f14e6a44 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/bootfdt.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/bootfdt.c
> @@ -327,6 +327,55 @@ static void __init process_chosen_node(const void *fdt, int node,
> add_boot_module(BOOTMOD_RAMDISK, start, end-start, false);
> }
>
> +static int __init process_static_memory(const void *fdt, int node,
> + const char *name,
> + u32 address_cells, u32 size_cells,
> + void *data)
> +{
> + int i;
> + int banks;
> + const __be32 *cell;
> + paddr_t start, size;
> + u32 reg_cells = address_cells + size_cells;
> + struct meminfo *mem = data;
> + const struct fdt_property *prop;
> +
> + if ( address_cells < 1 || size_cells < 1 )
> + {
> + printk("fdt: invalid #address-cells or #size-cells for static memory");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Check if static memory property belongs to a specific domain, that is,
> + * its node `domUx` has compatible string "xen,domain".
> + */
> + if ( fdt_node_check_compatible(fdt, node, "xen,domain") != 0 )
> + printk("xen,static-mem property can only locate under /domUx node.\n");
> +
> + prop = fdt_get_property(fdt, node, name, NULL);
> + if ( !prop )
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> + cell = (const __be32 *)prop->data;
> + banks = fdt32_to_cpu(prop->len) / (reg_cells * sizeof (u32));
> +
> + for ( i = 0; i < banks && mem->nr_banks < NR_MEM_BANKS; i++ )
> + {
> + device_tree_get_reg(&cell, address_cells, size_cells, &start, &size);
> + /* Some DT may describe empty bank, ignore them */
> + if ( !size )
> + continue;
> + mem->bank[mem->nr_banks].start = start;
> + mem->bank[mem->nr_banks].size = size;
> + mem->nr_banks++;
> + }
> +
> + if ( i < banks )
> + return -ENOSPC;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int __init early_scan_node(const void *fdt,
> int node, const char *name, int depth,
> u32 address_cells, u32 size_cells,
> @@ -345,6 +394,9 @@ static int __init early_scan_node(const void *fdt,
> process_multiboot_node(fdt, node, name, address_cells, size_cells);
> else if ( depth == 1 && device_tree_node_matches(fdt, node, "chosen") )
> process_chosen_node(fdt, node, name, address_cells, size_cells);
> + else if ( depth == 2 && fdt_get_property(fdt, node, "xen,static-mem", NULL) )
> + process_static_memory(fdt, node, "xen,static-mem", address_cells,
> + size_cells, &bootinfo.static_mem);
I am a bit concerned to add yet another method to parse the DT and all
the extra code it will add like in patch #2.
From the host PoV, they are memory reserved for a specific purpose.
Would it be possible to consider the reserve-memory binding for that
purpose? This will happen outside of chosen, but we could use a phandle
to refer the region.
>
> if ( rc < 0 )
> printk("fdt: node `%s': parsing failed\n", name);
> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/setup.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/setup.h
> index 5283244015..5e9f296760 100644
> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/setup.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/setup.h
> @@ -74,6 +74,8 @@ struct bootinfo {
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> struct meminfo acpi;
> #endif
> + /* Static Memory */
> + struct meminfo static_mem;
> };
>
> extern struct bootinfo bootinfo;
>
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-18 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-18 5:21 [PATCH 00/10] Domain on Static Allocation Penny Zheng
2021-05-18 5:21 ` [PATCH 01/10] xen/arm: introduce domain " Penny Zheng
2021-05-18 8:58 ` Julien Grall [this message]
2021-05-19 2:22 ` Penny Zheng
2021-05-19 18:27 ` Julien Grall
2021-05-20 6:07 ` Penny Zheng
2021-05-20 8:50 ` Julien Grall
2021-06-02 10:09 ` Penny Zheng
2021-06-03 9:09 ` Julien Grall
2021-06-03 21:32 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-06-03 22:07 ` Julien Grall
2021-06-03 23:55 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-06-04 4:00 ` Penny Zheng
2021-06-05 2:00 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-06-07 18:09 ` Julien Grall
2021-06-09 9:56 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-06-09 10:47 ` Julien Grall
2021-06-15 6:08 ` Penny Zheng
2021-06-17 11:22 ` Julien Grall
2021-05-18 5:21 ` [PATCH 02/10] xen/arm: handle static memory in dt_unreserved_regions Penny Zheng
2021-05-18 9:04 ` Julien Grall
2021-05-18 5:21 ` [PATCH 03/10] xen/arm: introduce PGC_reserved Penny Zheng
2021-05-18 9:45 ` Julien Grall
2021-05-19 3:16 ` Penny Zheng
2021-05-19 9:49 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-19 19:49 ` Julien Grall
2021-05-20 7:05 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-19 19:46 ` Julien Grall
2021-05-20 6:19 ` Penny Zheng
2021-05-20 8:40 ` Penny Zheng
2021-05-20 8:59 ` Julien Grall
2021-05-20 9:27 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-20 9:45 ` Julien Grall
2021-05-18 5:21 ` [PATCH 04/10] xen/arm: static memory initialization Penny Zheng
2021-05-18 7:15 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-18 9:51 ` Penny Zheng
2021-05-18 10:43 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-20 9:04 ` Penny Zheng
2021-05-20 9:32 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-18 10:00 ` Julien Grall
2021-05-18 10:01 ` Julien Grall
2021-05-19 5:02 ` Penny Zheng
2021-05-18 5:21 ` [PATCH 05/10] xen/arm: introduce alloc_staticmem_pages Penny Zheng
2021-05-18 7:24 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-18 9:30 ` Penny Zheng
2021-05-18 10:09 ` Julien Grall
2021-05-18 10:15 ` Julien Grall
2021-05-19 5:23 ` Penny Zheng
2021-05-24 10:10 ` Penny Zheng
2021-05-24 10:24 ` Julien Grall
2021-05-18 5:21 ` [PATCH 06/10] xen: replace order with nr_pfns in assign_pages for better compatibility Penny Zheng
2021-05-18 7:27 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-18 9:11 ` Penny Zheng
2021-05-18 10:20 ` Julien Grall
2021-05-19 5:35 ` Penny Zheng
2021-05-18 5:21 ` [PATCH 07/10] xen/arm: intruduce alloc_domstatic_pages Penny Zheng
2021-05-18 7:34 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-18 8:57 ` Penny Zheng
2021-05-18 11:23 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-21 6:41 ` Penny Zheng
2021-05-21 7:09 ` Jan Beulich
2021-06-03 2:44 ` Penny Zheng
2021-05-18 12:13 ` Julien Grall
2021-05-19 7:52 ` Penny Zheng
2021-05-19 20:01 ` Julien Grall
2021-05-18 10:30 ` Julien Grall
2021-05-19 6:03 ` Penny Zheng
2021-05-18 5:21 ` [PATCH 08/10] xen/arm: introduce reserved_page_list Penny Zheng
2021-05-18 7:39 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-18 8:38 ` Penny Zheng
2021-05-18 11:24 ` Jan Beulich
2021-05-19 6:46 ` Penny Zheng
2021-05-18 11:02 ` Julien Grall
2021-05-19 6:43 ` Penny Zheng
2021-05-18 5:21 ` [PATCH 09/10] xen/arm: parse `xen,static-mem` info during domain construction Penny Zheng
2021-05-18 12:09 ` Julien Grall
2021-05-19 7:58 ` Penny Zheng
2021-05-18 5:21 ` [PATCH 10/10] xen/arm: introduce allocate_static_memory Penny Zheng
2021-05-18 12:05 ` Julien Grall
2021-05-19 7:27 ` Penny Zheng
2021-05-19 20:10 ` Julien Grall
2021-05-20 6:29 ` Penny Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e1b90f06-92d2-11da-c556-4081907124b8@xen.org \
--to=julien@xen.org \
--cc=Bertrand.Marquis@arm.com \
--cc=Wei.Chen@arm.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=penny.zheng@arm.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).